CobbWEB: MDJonline readers sound off on plans for city health clinic
September 24, 2010 12:00 AM | 1450 views | 3 3 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR'S NOTE: Below is a selection of responses shared by our of MDJonline.com in reaction to recent MDJ articles:

A City Divided: Employees, doctors differ on proposed Marietta clinic

Give me liberty wrote: The obvious disdain shown for Mr. Wills by a few Marietta "government workers" says it all. We have created a special class of public servants who believe that they are entitled to just about anything they can conjure up (as evidenced by the revelation of life time health benefits for any elected official having served at the public will). I felt the hearing was a dog and pony show put on to sugar coat what Mr. Bruton and his staff have already set in motion to pass. And, if the taxpayers of Marietta do not increase vocal opposition, we will be stuck with another failed vision of cost savings run amuck. Has Mr. Bruton looked at cutting benefits rather than creating one? I seriously doubt it.

Same song wrote: Please, someone tell me, they aren't going to rush this thing through without more study! Tell Thunder this is not another "mosque emergency"! The politicians need to understand that we voters, we taxpayers, are watching what is happening in our city government. It does not sound like we are rolling in money if someone has not had a raise in three years. How about looking into this more closely?

MiddleMan wrote: I stopped going to Wellstar Urgent Care, because they could not treat anything but a runny nose. If you broke a finger, you paid their fee and then were told to go to an orthopedic. I'll just go to my internal medicine doctor or specialists to begin with. The city should offer an HMO and it would basically do the same thing.

Why not WellStar wrote: If this type of clinic is truly needed to save money, and if proved it can provide GOOD health care, why are we not strongly urging WellStar do it? I understand they wouldn't even consider the RFP. They take and take but didn't want to do this. WellStar pays no taxes but has all of the city services, even obtaining concessions to close streets, absorb property, etc.? Perhaps the city should have pushed harder ...tit for tat. With so many unemployed, "right here in River City".....why are we even considering an out of state company? Many other excellent arguments made last night at the meeting.

MoreOthesame wrote: True, the employees I've called do want a clinic. Employees, just like you, me or anyone else don't want to see more of their pay gone to pay higher premiums of Obamacare. City employees can't afford to live in Pearlberg's ward so apparently they have no voice because they happen to not make a million or so a year! Get real here! Prarlberg is protecting the doctors who really shouldn't be afraid of losing patients if they run a good practice ... called competition. I thought that was one reason we are grumbling against Obama. This is really very simple- doctors make tons of money so listen it appears only their opinion matters. Who is listening to 1200 or so workers, retirees and dependents? These are the people we attend church with, our kids play ball with, our grandchildren see in the parks. This plan helps the employees WHILE saving the city money... You be the judge, just who has the voice here- only the million dollar doctors.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
NorthCobbResident
|
September 24, 2010
I can see where the City Health Clinic could be a benefit to reduce the amount of time government employees spend in a doctor's office for minor illnesses and could potentially save the City money, plus reduce the amount of time employees are away from the job due to illnesses and improve productivity. My employer provides me with an HMO and last year I started having flu like symptoms on a Wednesday evening, so I called my physician's office at 8:00 AM on Thursday morning. The receptionist indicated the earliest they could get me in was 4 PM the following Thursday because they were backlogged with a lot of people that had already made appointments. Yes, I could have elected to go to one of those "doc in a box" walk-in MedFirst type clinics and paid a fee much more than my co-pay because these are not covered under my insurance, nor is there one close to where I work or I could have gone to the Emergency Room at WellStar Kennestone or Cobb Hospital, waited for four hours to see a doctor then paid a $100 co-pay, but I feel I am more responsible than that. Emergency rooms are for true emergencies and to me unless I am having problems breathing, chest pain or a severed limb I am not going to an emergency room to take someone's slot that is having a true emergency. I tell you from this experience that if my employer had a company sponsored health clinic I would have gone to it in a minute with no hesitation or second thoughts. I applaud the City for considering this type of program. The City of Marietta has been a leader in many other areas and I can see the potential in this program.
Cavvies
|
September 24, 2010
It's interesting that the critics of the clinic make only two main points: (1) It might not save money, so it should not be tried, and (2) It might save money, so it's too good for City employees. Pretty uplifting logic.
Omi
|
September 24, 2010
Under the current 'progressive' administration at the national level we are being taxed cradle to grave and I hear rumblings that employee benefits are next on their list, right along with any 'financial transactions' at a financial institution. Has anyone even considered that this potential perk might prove to be taxable to the recipients? Please keep the government, even local, out of my life as much as possible. We have enough intrusion as it is. As a city taxpayer I prefer to use my own doctor, who knows my medical history.Were I am employee, such a health clinic would be the last place I'd visit, if at all.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides