Osborne upset over turf schedule
by Kathryn Dobies and John Bednarowski
kdobies@mdjonline.com, sportseditor@mdjonline.com
May 30, 2010 12:00 AM | 5047 views | 137 137 comments | 90 90 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The football field at Osborne High School on Saturday.
The football field at Osborne High School on Saturday.
slideshow
MARIETTA - The head football coach at Osborne High School and several booster club members are speaking out against the district's proposed schedule for artificial turf installation now that Osborne is in the second tier of schools to get the turf, which will most likely interrupt their fall football season.

Booster club members John Williams and Richard Tinker, along with head coach Troy Jones, spoke to the board about the proposed turf installation schedule at its meeting on Thursday, claiming they were never consulted about plans to move Osborne from the first installation group to the second. This move will delay Osborne's turf installation until the end of July and most likely cut into the school's football season, something Jones says the school cannot afford.

"Financially speaking, over the past three football seasons, our net profit ranged from $12,000 to $15,000," Jones said. "Having to relocate our home games this season will cause a severe blow to our entire football program. Typically, when the team plays at another school stadium they will concede concessions and keep the gate money. If this were to happen, our football program would have a difficult time existing."

Williams said the booster club, the football coaches and the principal didn't get word of the change in the schedule until reading it in a Journal article on May 18. Williams then started asking questions and e-mailed the district's chief of SPLOST, Doug Shepard for some answers.

Shepard told the Osborne boosters that since the turf installations were delayed because of the lawsuit, the district decided to reorganize its schedule and balance it fairly, based on the geographical location of schools throughout the county, as well as the condition of each field.

"We felt that it was only fair, because of the delay of the lawsuit, that we re-evaluate the schedule and consider a geographical distribution that would allow Phase 2 schools to play at a regional field that would be completed at Phase 1," Shepard told the Journal.

Shepard also assured the Journal that the district was consulting with the schools in Phase 2 of the schedule, because the installation for these schools would likely interfere with football season.

Before east Cobb resident, Walter 'Pete' Borden filed a lawsuit with the district questioning the usage of SPLOST III monies on artificial turf, the district had a three-tiered plan to install turf in the county's 16 high schools. Osborne, South Cobb, Pope, Kell and Wheeler high schools were in Phase 1. Campbell, Pebblebrook, Sprayberry, North Cobb Kennesaw Mountain and Walton high schools were in Phase 2, while Phase 3 included Hillgrove, Allatoona, Harrison, Lassiter and McEachern high schools. Harrison, Lassiter and McEachern all already have artificial turf fields and would be using their share of the money, about $550,000 to $600,000, to install a turf practice field.

After the board was finally legally allowed to vote to award a contract to the Marietta-based Deluxe Athletics, the district worked with the company to create a new installation plan, which changed the three phases into four and moved around several schools. Phase 1 of installation, which will begin in June, includes South Cobb, Walton, Kennesaw Mountain and Pope. Phase 2, which the Osborne community was told would begin on July 29, includes that high school along with Campbell, Kell and Wheeler. In Phase 3, beginning winter of 2010-2011, Sprayberry, Pebblebrook, Harrison and Lassiter will get turf. And in the final phase, which will begin next summer, turf will be installed for Allatoona, North Cobb, Hillgrove and McEachern.

"In the first two phases there are 8 schools and all 7 posts are represented," Shepard said. "There is a school from each of the 7 posts represented in the fields."

But with keeping with this current schedule, Jones said it may lead to the ultimate demise of the Osborne football program as a whole.

"If we are forced to move a home game we would have to give up the concessions to the host school," Jones said. "That's usually 50 percent of our net profit. If we have to give up our jamboree and our first two home games (financially) it would be devastating.

"If we don't have a field the first three or four weeks of football season, it's going to be a tough blow to our sub-varsity program. It would likely mean the JV and freshman teams would practice the entire season but only get to play two or three games. Maybe this is something other schools could handle, but our whole football program depends on being in Phase 1.

Despite Shepard’s assurances, there is no guarantee that if Osborne had its games moved to a school where the turf installation was complete they would remain close to the Cardinals’ fan base.

By the time the season starts, current Phase 1 and Phase 2 would mean South Cobb and McEachern would have turf while Osborne and Campbell would have their fields under construction. That creates a big problem on September 3, the second Friday of the season. South Cobb is scheduled to be on the road during Week 2, while McEachern, Osborne and Campbell all have home games. With only one school able to use South Cobb's field, it would mean either Osborne or Campbell would likely play in a nearly empty stadium in west Cobb at Harrison or in east Cobb at either Lassiter or Pope.

Tinker also found flaws in Shepard's logic, pointing out that Kennesaw Mountain, a school scheduled to get turf in Phase 1, has four playing fields, which can all be used for fall sports, while Osborne has only one.

"You could replace their (Kennesaw Mountain's) field at any time and not interrupt anything they do," Tinker told the board. "Whereas you could replace ours before the season and make our season successful ... Osborne has the most need for the turf field right now."

Chris Daniluk, the owner of Deluxe Athletics says a typical installation usually takes between 40 and 60 days. Daniluk hopes to have at least four fields done by this fall, and possibly all eight of the fields in the first two phases, if the weather cooperates. Deluxe Athletics and the district say all of the district's 16 fields will be installed by fall 2011. Daniluk also said the schedule went from three phases to four, because of the lawsuit. The original schedule called for a long installation phase in the spring and summer, Daniluk explained, but had to be realigned when the district lost the chance to install during the spring.

The Osborne community is still worried that their turf won't be done in time for this fall, and is asking the board to rearrange the schedule and once again put Osborne at the top of the installation list.

Williams, who is on the board-appointed oversight Facilities and Technology committee, said the F&T committee was also never told about the change in the schedule, and was always told that Osborne, Pebblebrook and South Cobb would be in the first phase of installation. The three high schools, in the southern part of the county, Williams says, have the worst field conditions and need the turf the most.

"We don't really have a field, we have dirt," Williams told the board on Thursday. "Our practice field shouldn't even be played on. I'm surprised we don't have more injuries than we do now. We've had teams from other counties who have come to play on our field that almost refuse to play."

Jones said the current field conditions have severely stunted the growth and rejuvenation of the Cardinals' program.

"I'm finishing up my fifth year here," Jones said. "We've probably sacrificed three winning seasons since I've been here because of injuries."

Jones said nearly all the injuries have happened during home games and they are not the kind of injuries strength and conditioning coaches can control.

"Ankle injuries," Jones said. "Many are ankle injuries. Six or seven starters get injured, and we haven't had a lot of depth since I've been here.

"I think right now. We are leaning on borrowed time before we have a catastrophic type injury."

But Williams went on to say that it's more than just about football, and that the other non-revenue generating sports get to share in the money that is raised at home football games.

"And people are going to say, it's not just about football, it's where the needs are in our community," Williams said. "We don't have any industry to draw revenues from. So everything we do is based on our activities we do at the school."

Board member Alison Bartlett, who represents Osborne, said she too was surprised to find out the high school was in the second phase of installation, saying it was her understanding Osborne's turf would be installed first.

If Osborne was forced to forfeit their home football season, Bartlett said: "It's a major impact to our revenues in the fall."

"The biggest thing it's about what they're doing for our community. We want to stop looking like we're the leftovers and we start looking like the rest of the county," Williams said.
comments (137)
« Problem Solved wrote on Tuesday, Jun 08 at 12:40 PM »
Switch Osborne with one of the phase 4 schools. Problem Solved.
« BADCATM wrote on Tuesday, Jun 08 at 09:58 AM »
Hey, let's be fair about this. Give Osborne their turf in time for a profitable season. It looks like some of the other schools have more than one field they could use.
« Damon in Marietta wrote on Saturday, Jun 05 at 04:26 AM »
As a parent of an OHS Football player...I am sickened by the amount of elitest hatred in this comment section. My son is entering the 10th grade, and has been in the Osborne football program since the 7th grade. OHS has the fewest amount of coaches than any school in Cobb county. When we travel to other schools, you see how the kids react to the beautiful stadiums and fields.

The OHS wrestling program received $200 from the school for the entire program. Kids had to share headgear and singlets.

I attend almost all the football and wrestling practices. I have seen these kids struggle and mature. My son went from getting in trouble and poor grades, to not getting in trouble at all and good grades. Coach Jones, Hayes, and Coach Hubscher (part of the teacher firings) have been great for my son and the rest of these kids. Who obviously have to have decent academics to be playing on the team.

I went to Wheeler in the 1990's. I know what it is like to play for a school that is afforded all the bells and whistles. That translates over to the esteem of the entire student body. All OHS is wanting is a glimpse of that.
« Voice of Reason wrote on Friday, Jun 04 at 04:26 PM »
Osborne parents and the football coach need to read the news more and be more sensitive to what's happening across the county right now. We simply can't waste any more time with wasteful projects like turf and training room renovations when we have to figure out how to prevent even more teachers from being let go.
« Hillgrove Mom wrote on Friday, Jun 04 at 12:01 PM »
If your academic needs/deficiencies are most severe in the county, your football needs are by default the least severe. So let Allatoona, North Cobb, Hillgrove or McEachern replace Osborne in phase 2 and let's move on with this ridiculous complaint about football season.
« OHSgradBackInTheDay wrote on Friday, Jun 04 at 10:46 AM »
OK, “Do Your Homework!!!!”

Let’s address the gorilla in the room. When you look at the criteria that the Newsweek raking used, you will find out you are not getting what you think. Newsweek doesn’t use percentage of student body to graduate, standardized test scores, AACT average, SAT average, percentage of students going on to college, stiff graduation requirements – Surprised yet? They do look at some criteria around AP classes, but wait, it gets better. They only take into account the number of AP tests taken divided by the graduation seniors. Doesn’t matter what you score on the test, only that you took it. There are other criteria used, but don’t be too impressed by that either. It doesn’t matter if your academics are improving if they never get to an acceptable standard.

The Osborne community can continue to tell themselves how great they are doing, and some believe it, but eventually you have to step into reality. Believe me, I use to be there.

« McEachern Parent wrote on Friday, Jun 04 at 10:16 AM »
INSS - South Cobb High School IS the first school in south Cobb to get turf... and that's the way it should stay!
« It'sNotSoSerious wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 11:27 PM »
You all talk about Osborne High School students like they are from Bankhead or Compton. Just because the football coach decided to voice his concerns about their football field does not mean that the school is not about academics. Quit trying to turn this into something that its not. The mdj knew this particular issue would cause controversy so thats why they decided to do a story on it. If anything, South Cobb High school should be the first school in South Cobb County to get astro turf because they are the one's in that part of the county that have consistently made AYP.
« Marty Moose wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 01:16 PM »
Where's Coach Tanner when you need him? This wouldn't be happening if he was still around!!!
« Mommy of 3 wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 01:03 PM »
Have these people gone mad? OHS needs turf like my youngest son needs more video games. Look, I realize athletics are fun to participate in and can be a great experience. But in times like these, when we don't get the basics right and we don't have the money, luxuries aren't an option.
« Quick fix wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 12:45 PM »
Base the new turf installation order on academics. If the school board says that education and academics are number 1, let's see them walk the walk.
« Bad Idea wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 11:30 AM »
If the Osborne turf cannot maintain the cheaper grass field, what makes anybody think they can maintain the much more expensive artificial turf? Some of you say Osborne doesn't have any money. So if the new turf is damaged in any way, who is going to pick up the tab since OHS doesn't have any?
« headsup10 wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 11:26 AM »
PLEASE Attend: 6/3-Today

Town Hall Meeting with Oakwood HS

Board Member Alison Bartlett

Hollydale ES - 5:45 PM

2901 Bayberry Drive Marietta,Ga. 30008

You may ask her any questions you would like to and you may leave when you need to if you have evening plans.
« Allatoona Parent wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 10:56 AM »
Rational Thought:

1. If that's the head football coach's job, then he shouldn't be on the county payroll during times like these. I coach baseball but my child will not be allowed to play baseball if his academic performance is lacking in any way.

2. It's news to me that a sports are now an obligation that taxpayers have to pony up for. Academics first is not a slogan. You're mixing up what OHS "wants" vs. what OHS needs.

3. Trivial point again because sports should not be priority number 1.
« The truth wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 09:31 AM »
The booster clubs and coaches are responsible for maintaining the football fields. Hillgroves football field is beautiful because Coach Ironside works VERY hard to maintain the field. Osbourne coaches are to blame for the dirt they play on. In addition, they do nt have bathroom doors because the students distroy everything. It is about school pride and these South Cobb school students do not have school pride. Get mad at me, but you all know it is true. Maybe the parents at these schools should focus on teaching their children to be respectful of their school and help keep up the fields. Yes, they need it most, but I give it a year before their own students spray graffiti on it or try to burn it. You know I am right. I think they should have it first, but they will ruin it in the long run! Very sad! Itisn't abou how much money a school has, it is about raising your children to have respect and pride in their school work, work ethic, and school community! It does not take a dime to behave, learn, and be respectful!
« Rational Thought wrote on Thursday, Jun 03 at 07:20 AM »
1. It's the job of the head football coach and the booster organization to improve the athletic department, so let's not be aghast at their efforts. They're doing what they should be doing - fighting for their program.

2. Quit tying this issue to academics. Just because the head football coach is making this request doesn't mean academics are being ignored at the school. It's possible to do two things at once. The school's academics are improving, albeit slowly. Let's be happy about that and keep encouraging them, given the area these kids are coming from.

3. The money will be spent for the field. They're just requesting they get their field earlier, to help out their financial condition.
« Stop this nonsense.. wrote on Wednesday, Jun 02 at 10:20 PM »
If I hear one more word about how any school's "needs" are football related, I'm going to puke. Seriously, what is wrong with you folks? We're short on money and all people can think about is getting football turf faster!
« Oakleigh Resident wrote on Wednesday, Jun 02 at 08:49 PM »
We are sinking to new lows. Why are some of you so gung-ho over football turf? I just find it so hard to believe that anybody would need football turf so urgently, especially at schools where the focus should be elsewhere. And, plus, since when did we start to make decisions based on "football need"??
« Second Thoughts wrote on Wednesday, Jun 02 at 04:46 PM »
This thing is getting more controversial by the day. I say we drop this turf idea for all schools before more lawsuits come in.
« Dan A. wrote on Wednesday, Jun 02 at 04:16 PM »
This is a sensitive debate to have but I'm glad we're having it. The truth of the matter is right now the school district has a severe shortage of funds. For some schools, the money is best spent not on football fields but it seems bureaucracy instead funnels money to where it's not really essential. Hopefully voters all over the county will remember this when they vote for SPLOST or their board members next time.