Coal plant developers notify Cobb EMC of permit issuance
by Marcus E. Howard
mhoward@mdjonline.com
August 27, 2009 01:00 AM | 870 views | 10 10 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
By Marcus E. Howard

mhoward@mdjonline.com

MARIETTA - Development of a $2.1 billion coal-fired power plant near Sandersville in middle Georgia that would supply energy for Cobb EMC and other Georgia EMCs in a consortium, is moving forward after draft permits were granted by the state Environmental Protection Division.

On Tuesday, Cobb EMC received notice from the EMC consortium, Power4Georgians LLC, that the EPD has issued four primary permits for surface water withdrawal, groundwater withdrawal, water discharge and an air permit.

Power4Georgians filed the permit applications with the state EPD in January 2008. The next step will be for it to get the permits.

The surface water draft permit allows the plant to withdraw up to 16 million gallons of water per day out of the Oconee River. The ground water draft permit allows it to drill 15 wells. The draft air permit allows a limited amount of emissions and specifies exactly what can be emitted from the plant in the process of generating electricity.

Cobb EMC is joining five other Georgia EMCs to build the energy facility. The plant would be the first power generator owned by the six EMCs, which now purchase their energy from wholesalers, and would allow them to own and operate their own plant and sell energy to themselves.

Cobb EMC CEO and President Dwight Brown said the construction of Plant Washington will benefit Cobb EMC's 190,000 customers in Cobb and Cherokee and parts of Bartow, Fulton and Paulding counties.

"We became involved in Power4Georgians to ensure that Cobb EMC could continue to provide a dependable supply of power to our members at an affordable cost," Brown said in a statement. "Plant Washington will be good for our members, good for our co-op and good for our state. Receiving the draft permits from the EPD shows that we are continuing to make progress to meet the needs of our members now and for many decades to come."

The proposed 850-megawatt Plant Washington sits on 1,600 acres near Sandersville, the county seat of Washington County. No construction work has begun. It is expected to be operational by 2016 or 2017.

Power4Georgians said the plant will be one of the cleanest coal-fired power plants in the country, generating enough electricity to meet the annual needs of 500,000 to 700,000 homes in Georgia.

"While we recognize there is a lot of work remaining to be done, the draft permits are a very positive indication that Plant Washington is moving forward," said Power4Georgians spokesman Dan Alford.

However, not everyone thinks that building the coal-fired plant is a good idea.

Georgia chapter members of the Sierra Club environmental group say the coal plant will have a hazardous impact on the state's water and air quality, and will also contribute to global warming by increasing carbon dioxide emissions. The Sierra Club, along with Friends of the Chattahoochee, has already filed a lawsuit against the proposed $2 billion Longleaf Energy plant in Early County in southwest Georgia. The state Supreme Court is deciding whether to hear the case.

"Coal is outdated and antiquated," said Erin Glynn, a conservation organizer for the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign.

Glynn noted that four other EMCs of the Power4Georgians consortium have opted out of building Plant Washington, reducing total membership from 10 to six EMCs (Cobb EMC, Snapping Shoals EMC, Pataula EMC, Central Georgia EMC, Upson EMC and Washington EMC). She said that means Cobb customers would therefore have to bear more of the cost of utilities.

"We have a choice of stepping 100 years in the past or stepping in the future of a clean energy Georgia," Glynn said.
comments (10)
« FloPakrp wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 10:49 AM »
Why is this plant not set for multi use of fuels?

The cost Im sure plays a part of what is being built by most now are built with using one of 3 options and not just coal.

Im sure that Brown and the courts have it all worked out, lol....

Energy and EMC are all one now, but the Energy side is treated like step kids and not given the same benefits as EMC employees. And they all work in the same buildings. The only cut backs went against the ProCore side which made them even lesser to the same EMC employee....

So I figure this power plant is just another cash cow for Brown and believe it or not the courts will support and reward him as they did in the past....
« coalwarrior wrote on Saturday, Aug 29 at 10:56 PM »
The blind pursuit of a coal plant by the management of Cobb EMC is unsettling on many levels. In the world of finance we see banks, brokerages and insurance companies looted by their managers. In the world of Cobb EMC the same thing has already happened once, in the creation of Cobb Energy as an ATM for CEO Dwight Brown and his accomplices. There is every reason to fear that the coal plant is another spin-off designed to enrich insiders at the expense of the Co-op and its members. How else to explain the fact that management is throwing caution to the wind and going full steam ahead with the coal plant even after four of the original members of the consortium are abandoning the project? In bailing out, these defectors are following the lead of all the other big players in the energy industry. Why does Cobb EMC not follow the lead of the leaders? In ignoring their advice, they risk the very financial future of the Coop. And why does management completely ignore the many studies, private and governmental, that demonstrate that the cheapest, fastest and cleanest way to meet future demand for electricity is by investing in efficiency? Clearly the coal plant is not designed to benefit the members of Cobb EMC. No doubt many of the real beneficiaries of this expensive boondoggle can be found on a list of the largest stockholders of Cobb Energy.
« curious george wrote on Saturday, Aug 29 at 03:00 AM »
I wonder why anyone would want to build a new coal power plant? Isn't that like building a coal burning locomotive and claiming it's clean and effective? It's old technology and not worthy of a great country like America. Look to the pollution in China as they continue destroying their environment. If we go ahead and use this outdated technology, we have no moral standing to object to China and India driving up global pollution.
« ranger-rick wrote on Saturday, Aug 29 at 02:49 AM »
To figure out why Power4Georgians and Cobb EMC are trying to build this coal fired plant, just follow the money. Dean Alford and Dwight Brown promise themselves to make millions off this operation. The financing is under the table, of course, just like the below the radar machinations with Cobb Energy that lined Dwight Brown's pockets. The board gave him a 3 million dollar loan that he didn't have to repay.

These guys are desperate to get their permit in place before carbon fees go into effect. They figure to receive carbon credits to sell without producing any energy. They also plan to score big with big landowners to pay for carbon offsets for growing timber. Timber they already have for profit and tax breaks.

The Power4Georgians plan is morally bankrupt. It will lead to costly increases for us EMC members while destroying our environment. There are better solutions.
« Crystal in Acworth wrote on Friday, Aug 28 at 10:03 PM »
As a customer of Cobb EMC and a member of the co-op I am appauled that the current board of directors can push forward with their coal plant agenda while several directors are sitting on the board well past their elected terms.

The membership certainly deserves a say in what is likely to be the most expensive and controversial decision the co-op will ever undertake.

Given a choice, would the members choose to increase energy efficiency 1 or 2% a year across the membership to match any projected increase in energy demand; or would they choose to invest upwards of $2.1 billion of co-op money in a coal plant?

Dwight Brown and the current board seem perfectly content to usurp the democratic process to push this thing through. Dwight Brown and company will profit from the deal, Cobb EMC members will pay for the plant, Georgians will bear the pollution, and the excess energy (which projections say we won't even need) will undoubtedly be sold off to other states.

It is despicable that they can continue to fleece the membership in plain sight and no one is willing to do anything about it.

« Awful Alford ;;; wrote on Friday, Aug 28 at 04:56 PM »
I bet the major benefit of this venture will be Awful Alford and Baffoon Brown and we the EMC monopoly members pay - just how much as EMC invested to date and what is the total obligation that Alford and Brown have assigned to Cobb EMC ?
« Michael A. Scott wrote on Friday, Aug 28 at 12:28 PM »
Coal fired plants are rapidly killing the planet. Stop Big Coal now.
« Milt in East Cobb wrote on Friday, Aug 28 at 11:37 AM »
This deal reeks of self dealing. My net price per Kwh is now over 14 cents ffrom CobbEMC, while my friends pay Ga Power only 9.2 cents per kwh. A coal plant won't solve that either. Cobb EMC would be better served by providing incentives to business to add solar to their roofs. Why don't we let Ga Power buy out Cobb EMC? Obviously GPC can run things cheaper. And, GPC has oversight by the PSC. Who oversees Dwight Brown & Co?
« EMC Member wrote on Thursday, Aug 27 at 09:38 AM »
There should be injunction issued to prevent Cobb EMC from moving forward on such a large venture without having a democratically elected board. The majority of the current board is serving with expired terms and under a cloud of suspicion of corruption. The Georgia Legislature should also get involved in this matter to prevent such problems in the future. Don Parsons where are you on this? Your constituents are watching you.
« lemmer wrote on Thursday, Aug 27 at 04:09 AM »
Are they building an empire? Cobb EMC has raised the wholesale power rate 2oo% since last year. Their cost increase less than 30 %. They are not under the control of Georgia's public service commission. When allowed to create their own power who will benefit?