Liberal specialty: Counterfeit compassion
by Melvyn L Fein
August 04, 2014 04:00 AM | 2022 views | 4 4 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Melvyn Fein
Melvyn Fein
Liberals are convinced they are particularly nice. They are certain that they are more compassionate than others. Nice to women, blacks, gays, foreigners and the poor, they sympathize with everyone — save perhaps conservatives.

The problem is this compassion is largely counterfeit. It sounds like the real thing when liberals pontificate about how dedicated they are to improving the lot of the downtrodden, but it vanishes when they are put to the test.

Nancy Pelosi provides a wonderful example. When the news channels were full of pictures of young children languishing in holding facilities on our southern border, she gushed about how concerned she was for their welfare. With her arms spread apart, she declared she wished she could take them all home with her.

Of course, she knew she could not. She was aware that many thousands of Central Americans were streaming into the country, and she bemoaned their plight. Yet she was not prepared to do anything about it, except prattle on about how worried she was.

Pelosi might tell us that at least her heart was in the right place, whereas conservatives are heartless. Nonetheless, if your head is not also in the right place, neither is your heart. If you are not ready to do something that genuinely helps, you are all talk and no real kindness.

I am reminded of the years I spent working in a psychiatric hospital. It was grueling, discouraging work because so many of the patients were terribly ill. They suffered from schizophrenia, affective disorders and manic-depression. Of these, the schizophrenics were worst off, trapped in their agony and delusions.

More painful still, the vast majority of the psychotics were not going to get better. They might be medicated to control their symptoms, but they were never going to approach normality.

For those of us who genuinely cared, this broke our hearts. We were fond of our charges and wished them the best. Nonetheless, we knew that the big dreams of their childhoods would never be realized. Even so, we worked with them to make their lives as comfortable as possible.

There were others, however, who were transient workers. Almost always sweet young things, they arrived at the hospital full of hope. Because they possessed boundless compassion, their love was sure to rescue those with whom they came into contact.

Then, thanks to their magical kindness, the patients they saved would be eternally grateful. Except this never happened. The fairy-tale cures never materialized and even when patients improved, few were appreciative. They took this help as their due.

So how did the sweet young things react? Well, they disappeared. Crushed by an empathetic overload, they saved themselves by changing jobs. Only the tough souls, the ones prepared to handle agonizing frustrations, remained behind to continue ministering to the patients. They were the ones who actually cared.

Liberals are like those sweet young things. They are all aflutter about how they are going to remake the world, but when the going gets tough, they hide behind a screen of words. Better yet, they blame others for exacerbating the problems they were not equipped to solve.

We see this in Texas, where the liberals declare the breakdown of border security a humanitarian crisis. Their hearts go out to the huddled masses yearning to breathe free. But do they acknowledge their role in creating this emergency? Do they rush to change the laws that set it in motion? No, they just kvetch!

We see this in Gaza, where the liberals rush to send millions in relief to Hamas, but then sidetrack money intended to replenish Israel’s Iron Dome. They also propose a ceasefire that will allow the Islamists to regroup and start again. No thought is given to those who may perish in the renewed fighting two years from now.

Is this compassion? Is this genuine help — or a pretense of concern? I, for one, am no longer fooled by the crocodile tears.

Melvyn L. Fein Ph.D. is professor of sociology at Kennesaw State University.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
just saying
August 07, 2014
"If by a "Liberal" you mean someone who looks ahead rather than behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people, their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties, someone who believes we can break the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what you mean by a "Liberal", then I am proud to say I am a "Liberal".

John F. Kennedy
Tony Maddox
August 05, 2014
@Gary. Seriously? I should help pay for them, cover their expenses? And what have they done to 'deserve everything?' And so, which of MY children should I take from so that I can help these alien refugees? I planned for my 2 kids, not 200,000 of someone elses. Typical liberal thinking, take from one/give to another.
Gary Pazschaka
August 05, 2014
You are so off base. Liberals are teh only group that carea about anything. Te republicans all want to send these poor people to jail or back to their own country. They deserve everything for that trip. We should take care of them, educate them, pay for them. Everyone can afford to help and should all pitch in to cover the expense.
Hank Moody
August 04, 2014
You are literally the new Andy Rooney.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides