Rumors of recovery are greatly exaggerated
by Daniel Joy
July 17, 2014 01:43 AM | 1076 views | 4 4 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In his Friday column in the MDJ, Kevin Foley advances the argument that Barack Obama has engineered an economic recovery. Because 288,000 jobs were added in June, 2014, the Dow 30 reached record 17,000 levels and unemployment fell to 6.1 percent, Foley asserts that Obama’s economic engineering deserves the credit. Not so fast.

The rumors of an economic recovery are greatly exaggerated. The data on which Foley and others drawing similar conclusions rely when scrutinized point to a different conclusion. The recent June jobs report disguises bad news. Full-time employment fell in June by 523,000, while part-time employment rose by 800,000, thus yielding a nominal job growth of 288,000. Celebrating the loss of more than a half million full-time jobs is perverse.

Aggregate employment growth has not been sufficient to absorb young people entering the job market for years. Labor force participation remains at a 36-year low. If part-time employment were not considered full-time for unemployment rate purposes, the “rate” would not be 6.1 percent. If those who have quit looking for employment were counted as unemployed, as most certainly are, the unemployment rate would be closer to 10 percent than 6 percent. This is not the stuff of a sound expansion.

What about the Dow 30 above 17,000 and the S&P 500 at almost 2000? Is this not a sign of economic strength? It is for some.

Facing sluggish growth after several failed efforts that included literally trillions of dollars of deficit spending, the Administration and its allies at the Federal Reserve moved to “quantitative easing,” a program designed to produce a “wealth effect” as a means of stimulating the economy. By pushing stock prices up, so the “wealth effect” theory goes, the investor class (aka “the 1 percent”) will lead the nation out of the economic doldrums as they increase their capital and consumption spending.

In what must be the greatest political irony of all time, the Administration openly embraced what amounts to “trickle down” policies to get the economy moving.

And it is working to some degree. The Hamptons and Beverly Hills have never had it so good. The precincts of the rich and famous are doing very well indeed. Luxury-good retailers are turning record profits. High-end real estate and autos are selling very well. Rising equity prices are improving the balance sheets of the investor class but have not created the kind of economic expansion that a nation of 310,000,000 needs.

The limited success achieved by “quantitative easing” has led the Obama Administration to return to residential underwriting standards that will increase real estate prices in general and residential prices in particular.

The Administration recently dismissed Edward DeMarco, who resisted valiantly the attempt to return us of the days of a real estate bubble and replaced him with a politically reliable Melvin Watt, whose task it will be to make borrowing easier and thus create demand for new and existing housing.

The Obama Administration is returning to the days of assets bubbles as it vainly looks for short term results that will permit it to praise its efforts at getting the national economy moving again. Let’s hope the cost does not exceed the benefit.

Reliance on data from one quarter, never mind one month, is risky at best. Handing out political credit based on June employment growth, without simultaneously, addressing the significant decline in work force participation that continues at a 36-year low and the falling full time employment opportunities for middle class workers and retirees is incomplete.

Foley expresses concern about what has become the economic concern de jour of the political progressives, to-wit: growing income and wealth disparity. Let us assume he is correct about his claim although there are significant questions whether data on which Mr. Foley and current income inequality guru Thomas Piketty have relied to conclude there is rising inequality. That, however, is a subject for another day.

Those concerned with growing income and wealth disparity need to come to terms with the Administration’s support for policies that have explicitly embraced enhancing “wealth” of the investor class to spur economic growth.

What is clear is that the Administration and its allies at the Federal Reserve, having tried everything else in the Keynesian quiver, have embraced “trickle down economics” as the road to restore prosperity.

When are those concerned about income and wealth disparity going to start looking at Barack Obama and his “wealth affect” policies rather than posturing against the Republicans in the House of Representatives who they claim have done nothing but obstruct the road to economic Nirvana? What is it they would have the House do? Anyone have any idea?

Daniel Joy is an attorney in Marietta.

Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Old man, hard data..
|
July 17, 2014
GW Bush record:

Stock market (DJIA), Start of presidency 10,587, end of presidency 8281 (a 21.7% loss)

Unemployment rate start of presidency 4.2%, end of presidency 7.2% (a 3% increase)

Federal budget deficit start of presidency $236B SURPLUS, end of presidency $1.2T deficit

Families living in poverty start of presidency 6.4M, end of presidency 7.6M.

So, East Cobb Senior disguising himself as, er, himself now...there's been a ton of reparative work being done during the Obama presidency to fix the utter economic mess created during the Bush years. Perhaps you can go back and show us a letter to the editor from you back in 2008 bemoaning Bush's economic record -- otherwise I suggest you just sit back quietly, politely, and let the Dems continue to fix the economy.
CobbCoGuy
|
July 19, 2014
Cost of gas per gasbuddy.com:

Jan 2009: about $1.59/gallon.

July 2014: about $3.60/gallon.

I should probably bring it to the attention of the low info readers out there that the price of fuel affects everything you buy. EVERYTHING.

How's that "Hopenchange" workin' out for the low and middle class?

anonymous
|
July 20, 2014
@CobbCoGuy You are right $3.60 a gallon really affects my Navigator and Hummer!
Kevin Foley
|
July 17, 2014
East Cobb Senior comes out of the closet! Congratulations, Mr. Joy. See, that wasn't so hard!

Conservatives have been using all kinds of triangulation to diminish the Obama recovery, but I stand by my numbers, the same ones conservatives would proudly be pointing to if there was a Republican in the White House instead of an African-America Democrat. Equivocate all you want, but is the country better off today than it was in the fall of 2008?

You better believe it.

Now, sir. Please address the crux of my column: Billionaire Nick Hanauer, who is a lot wealthier than you are, says we need to fix the "glaring" economic inequality in America or we'll soon see a revolution (and not a tea party one). Is Hanauer right or wrong?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides