National Voices: Obama has lost all credibility on IRS and Benghazi
by The Washington Examiner
February 12, 2014 12:00 AM | 1884 views | 4 4 comments | 38 38 recommendations | email to a friend | print
President Obama’s health care law has eclipsed everything else his administration has done, sending his popularity to new lows. But in assessing the president’s credibility, Americans should not forget two scandals that remain as important as his broken promises on health care reform.

A House oversight hearing on Thursday brought renewed attention to the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups from 2010 to the present. Catherine Engelbrecht testified that, after she applied for tax-exempt status for the King Street Patriots in Houston, four federal agencies that had completely ignored her family’s business for 20 years began visiting, often. The alphabet soup of agencies that took sudden interest in Engelbrecht included OSHA (which saw a fork lift driver without a seat belt), the IRS (which audited her and her husband personally, as well as the business), the BATF (even though her business makes no gun parts), and the FBI.

Was this a coincidence? It’s known that during this same period, the IRS was systematically harassing hundreds of other small Tea Party groups with intrusive, illegal questionnaires and unwarranted delays to their tax-status applications. Also consider the story of Jeff Black, a whistle-blowing former air marshal who years earlier revealed shoddy security practices to congressional investigators. Black was audited by the IRS on the very same day in June 2010 when the documentary “Please Remove Your Shoes” debuted in theaters, featuring him as a critic of the Transportation Security Administration.

It would seem more of a coincidence if there was no political motivation behind the treatment given Engelbrecht. Yet Obama told Bill O’Reilly in an interview that aired Super Bowl Sunday that there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” in the IRS’s handling of conservative groups’ applications — as if he had been there himself and knew the whole story.

Then there is the terrorist assault in Benghazi on a U.S. diplomatic post that left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others dead on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks in the U.S.

A bipartisan Senate panel found last month that a competent administration would have heeded prior warning signs — including multiple other terrorist attacks in the area — and taken appropriate action to avoid a predictable and preventable disaster. Obama had unilaterally attacked Libya, and so he bore even more responsibility than did his predecessor in Iraq (who at least sought congressional permission).

Obama could not have been directly involved in the poor State Department decisions that weakened the consulate’s defenses. But after the fact, operating in an election year, he and senior aides took measures to deceive Americans about the facts behind Benghazi. For weeks before the 2012 presidential election, they discussed the attack as a spontaneous and inevitable result of Muslim rage over an offensive video trailer on YouTube.

But the evidence is overwhelming that the attack was a coordinated terrorist operation and it was known as such at the highest levels of the Obama administration within minutes after the bullets started flying. It’s hard to see even a smidgen of credibility in Obama’s Benghazi and IRS explanations.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bob Johnson
|
February 13, 2014
I guess we are supposed to just take Foley's word for it.
Guido Sarducci
|
February 13, 2014
Foley, it depends on what Senate panel you listen to. There is the one seeking the truth and then there is the storefront panel, trained in preconceptual investigation, which is going to ignore any and all evidence and testimony which is damaging to the administration or to Hillary.
Kevin Foley
|
February 12, 2014
"A bipartisan Senate panel found last month that a competent administration would have heeded prior warning signs..."

That is not what the Senate panel found. Total BS.
anonymous
|
February 12, 2014
There is ample evidence that military contractors who made money overseas were also targeted for IRS audits. It's not as sexy for the news as the Tea Party, but if you know contractors you get the story.

The Obamas hate anyone who is associated with the military.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides