Cobb judge denies new Daker trial
by Rachel Gray
November 01, 2013 12:33 AM | 18156 views | 3 3 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Convicted murderer Waseem Daker is led into the courtroom of Cobb Superior Court Judge Mary Staley on Thursday to argue his more than 100 motions for a new trial.<br>Staff/Kelly J. Huff
Convicted murderer Waseem Daker is led into the courtroom of Cobb Superior Court Judge Mary Staley on Thursday to argue his more than 100 motions for a new trial.
Staff/Kelly J. Huff
MARIETTA — A Cobb Superior Court judge Wednesday denied an appeal for a new trial by a man convicted of strangling an east Cobb woman in 1995.

The appeal was made by Waseem Daker who was convicted in the 1995 strangulation death of Karmen Smith in her east Cobb home, and the stabbing of her then 5-year-old son, Nick Smith. The boy, now a man of 23, survived multiple stab wounds.

Daker was sentenced to life in prison plus 47½ years and remains in the Jackson State Prison.

The motions denied by Superior Court Judge Mary Staley included a new determination on indigency, which would declare Daker unable to pay for legal counsel, a string of requests to recuse the judge, and a motion to correct the court record and transcript.

In Staley’s ruling, she said there was no finding for trial error and the evidence still supports the guilty verdict.

Assistant District Attorney Jesse Evans, who prosecuted the original case, said it is rare for a defendant to win a motion for a new trial.

Evans said Staley had been patient about the many new trial motions, then Wednesday gave a strong stance that the new trial would not be granted.

“I felt (the strong language of the decision) was perfectly appropriate, given how (Daker) has abused the judicial process,” Evans said.

For two days in August and two days in October, Staley heard motions for a new trial, where 15 witnesses and experts were called for questioning.

Key witness recanted her testimony

The three-week trial of Daker rested on a key witness, Loretta Spencer Blatz, who last spring recanted her entire testimony in four separate affidavits, which stated she lied about Daker’s role in the murder.

Blatz said she “wrongfully accused” Daker and that after his conviction she decided to come forward with the truth.

Staley said in Wednesday’s decision that the testimony by Blatz in the new trial hearing was without merit and that Blatz demonstrated “erratic post-trial behavior.”

Evans said there are thousands of pages of evidence taken from Daker’s prison cell that show repeated contact between him and Blatz where Daker asked her to change her testimony.

“He was pretty manipulative in the things he was doing from prison,” Evans said.

Evans said Daker handwrote the affidavits and mailed them to Blatz for her to type and submit to the court.

Daker represented himself at the trial with Jason D. Treadaway, a Marietta lawyer, as standby counsel to consult on questions.

Evans said Daker has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia.

“It is kind of a back door way to appeal the original trial,” Evans said.

Depending on how quickly Daker files a notice of appeal, it could take a year for the motion to be heard, if at all.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
June 09, 2014
Oh yeah, and by the bye,

Ms Lottie Whackateer can't be charged for perjury because the court didn't accept her "new testimony" therefore she didn't break the law. She new that from day one and that she had nothing to lose. The state was never going to give waseem a new trial and certainly wasn't going to release him. Old Lottie and waseem just get more time in the spotlight. They both are sick pups, it's just that some are sicker than others. Can you guess which one? Go figga!

Richard Ellis
Bill Deleo
February 01, 2014
The key witness against a defendant admits they made up their testimony and a judge says "there's no evidence for a new trial" ???

That is pretty much the absolute grounds for a new trial.

Just Wait
November 01, 2013
Now if he would just go away.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides