Despite controversy, stand-your-ground law repeals unlikely
by Curt Anderson, Associated Press
July 21, 2013 10:45 PM | 1063 views | 1 1 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
After removing his suit coat, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Frank Cuthbertson puts on a hoodie, holds up a copy of the U.S. Constitution and shouts, ‘This is not probable cause,’ during a forum in Tacoma, Wash., on Saturday.
After removing his suit coat, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Frank Cuthbertson puts on a hoodie, holds up a copy of the U.S. Constitution and shouts, ‘This is not probable cause,’ during a forum in Tacoma, Wash., on Saturday.
slideshow
MIAMI — Despite an outcry from civil rights groups, a call for close examination by President Barack Obama and even a 1960s-style sit-in at the Florida governor’s office, the jury’s verdict that George Zimmerman was justified in shooting unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin is unlikely to spur change to any of the nation’s stand-your-ground self-defense laws.

“I support stand your ground,” Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said last week.

“I do not see any reason to change it,” said Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, also a Republican.

At least 22 states have laws similar to that in Florida, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Many are conservative and lean toward laws that defend gun owners’ rights. So far, there does not appear to be an appetite in Florida or other states to repeal or change the laws, which generally eliminate a person’s duty to retreat in the face of a serious physical threat. In fact, some states are moving in the opposite direction.

“The debate about stand-your-ground laws largely reproduces existing divisions in American politics, particularly between blacks and whites and between Democrats and Republicans,” said John Sides, associate professor of political science at George Washington University.

Zimmerman, a 29-year-old former neighborhood watch volunteer, was acquitted this month of second-degree murder and manslaughter charges in the 2012 shooting of 17-year-old Martin in a gated community in Sanford, Fla. Zimmerman told police he shot Martin only after the African-American teenager physically attacked him; Martin’s family and supporters say Zimmerman, who identifies himself as Hispanic, racially profiled Martin as a potential criminal and wrongly followed him.

Zimmerman’s lawyers decided not to pursue a pretrial immunity hearing allowed by Florida’s stand-your-ground law. But jurors were told in final instructions by Circuit Judge Debra Nelson that they should acquit Zimmerman if they found “he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it was necessary.”

Before the stand-your-ground law was passed in 2005, the instruction would have read that Zimmerman “cannot justify his use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm if by retreating he could have avoided the need to use that force.”

Since the law was enacted, justifiable homicides in Florida have risen from an annual average of 13.2 between 2001 and 2005 to an average of 42 between 2006 and 2012, including a record 66 in 2012, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. FBI data have shown similar increases in some states that enacted similar laws, such as Texas, while others haven’t seen an uptick.

Beyond Florida, these states have some form of a stand-your-ground law, according to the national group: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.

Attorney General Eric Holder, in a speech last week to the NAACP convention in Orlando, said the Martin shooting demonstrates a need to re-examine stand-your-ground laws nationwide. He said they “senselessly expand the concept of self-defense” and increase the possibility of deadly confrontations.

On Friday, Obama said the nation needed to do some “soul-searching.” He questioned whether a law could really promote peace and security if it sent a message that someone who is armed “has the right to use those firearms even if there is a way for them to exit from a situation.”

Civil rights leaders, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, said they would push for repeal of the laws, starting in Florida, where a group of young protesters occupied GOP Gov. Rick Scott’s office demanding change.

“If we can do it in Florida, we can affect other states,” Sharpton said last week.

On Saturday, Sharpton’s National Action Network organized “Justice for Trayvon” rallies in more than 100 cities. In addition to pushing for federal civil rights charges against Zimmerman, the rallies attacked stand-your-ground laws.

“By standing his ground, George Zimmerman was able to get away with murdering a 17-year-old black man,” said Chelsea Jones, a student who spoke at a Dallas rally. “I can only imagine what the black community can achieve by standing their ground.”

Even entertainer Stevie Wonder has joined the outcry, vowing not to perform in Florida as long as stand-your-ground remains on the books.

Sharpton suggested that the law’s opponents might boycott Florida orange juice, and other groups want a boycott on the state’s tourist destinations, both multibillion-dollar industries.

Florida state Sen. Chris Smith, a Fort Lauderdale Democrat, said the Zimmerman verdict was a “wakeup call” that should at least open fresh debate on stand-your-ground laws.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FROM TEXAS
|
July 24, 2013
These D/A’s are the very people that will be more likely targets form gang-bangers, repeal stand your ground and I guess the new law could be the gang-banger protection act. It would be your duty to prove you ran away or retreated enough to satisfy guilty until proven innocent charge. Just think how many minority majority people would end up in jail. The other problem with the gang-banger protection act is that you’re going to kill off too much of the white working class tax base along with the honest minorities that work for a living.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides