We should repeat 2006, not 1986
by D.A. King
Columnist
July 02, 2013 11:41 PM | 1676 views | 6 6 comments | 72 72 recommendations | email to a friend | print
D. A. King
D. A. King
slideshow
As happened in 2006, amnesty has passed the U.S. Senate again. With more empty assurances of future enforcement in exchange for immediate legalization, the entire Democratic conference was joined by 14 Republicans. They were shielded by Marco Rubio, who is now known in conservative circles as “Marco Rubio, a certified Schumer Republican.”

Future American sovereignty, security and employment possibilities now rests with the U.S. House of Representatives; in which members must face re-election every two years.

Now home on a July Fourth break and gauging public resistance to another amnesty, the House GOP will meet on July 10 back in Washington to compare notes and decide how — or even if — to handle promises of future immigration enforcement.

Legalization: to be or not to be? — that is the nation-altering question. Will the Republican-controlled House also capitulate to the amnesty coalition led by big business? We’ll see.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) claims that a coming House-designed promise (new and improved!) of a five-year period of legal status for 11 million victims of borders arrangement would be somehow “temporary” and reversible. Like temporary and reversible taxes. Ryan says “trust us.”

Along with the liberal media, ever-helpful and caring Democrats Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi instruct the Republicans that another amnesty would help them re-gain the White House.

I can’t find it in the 1,200 or so pages of the Senate swindle, but in his radio ads Rubio might as well have also have promised to equip Border Patrol agents with surplus phasers (set them on stun!) from the Starship Enterprise and to install transporter rooms every 10 meters on the Southern border.

History proves those promises would have as much chance of being honored as the enforcement in-the-future, “no-we mean it this time, really!” language in any legalization legislation.

A partial reminder of broken immigration enforcement promises from their own federal government that Americans have endured, from an outline from the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington D.C.:

1986 — Congress passed the Immigration Reform and Control Act amnesty, with the estimate that it would affect an estimated one million illegal aliens. While promising an end to illegal immigration, the law prohibited the employment of future illegal aliens. The enforcement never really happened. The number of illegals who were legalized was closer to three million. In 2004, only three employers in the entire nation were fined for hiring illegal aliens. The (very) low estimate is that 7 million to 8 million illegal aliens continue to hold American jobs.

On employment recovery, the Wall St. Journal recently reported that “even if the rate of hiring doubled, it would take more than three years to get employment back to its prerecession level, after adjusting for (non-amnesty) population growth, according to estimates from the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project.” (WSJ June 24, 2013)

1996 — In the wake of the first World Trade Center bombing, Congress passed another wide-ranging enforcement law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. Among its provisions was a requirement to develop an automated check-in/check-out visa system for foreign visitors, by which the feds could at least identify those who refused to leave as promised. Congress has mandated such a system five more times for all ports of entry/exit. No such system exists.

2001 — In line with the 9/11 commission recommendations, the USA Patriot Act expanded the mandated visa departure system requirements to include biometrics. No such system exists.

The recently passed Senate amnesty bill actually dismantles the never-enforced visa monitoring laws. Reasoning? “Too costly.”

2005 — The REAL ID Act required that state driver’s licenses meet certain minimum standards to be acceptable for federal purposes, such as boarding airplanes. The standards included requiring proof of legal presence in the United States before issuing a license. The driver’s license is essential to illegal aliens seeking to embed themselves in American society. The original deadline for state compliance was 2008, later postponed to 2011, then 2013, and now 2017. It seems likely the deadline will be extended yet again, permitting more states to continue issuing licenses to illegal aliens. Terrorists notice and take advantage of these dangerous broken promises.

2006 — The Secure Fence Act of 2006 required “at least 2 layers of reinforced fencing” along roughly 650 miles of specifically designated stretches of the Mexican border. Less than 40 miles of such double-layered fencing have been built. The remainder is a mix of easily defeated single-layer “pedestrian” fencing and vehicle barriers.

Border Patrol Agents report that illegal crossings have tripled since the latest amnesty talks began again.

Pro-enforcement Georgians should contact their congressman. The amnesty coalition is doing exactly that right now.

The 2006 Senate amnesty died in the House. On legalization, we should repeat 2006 — not 1986.

D.A. King is president of the Cobb-based Dustin Inman Society and an expert on immigration matters. Twitter: @DAKDIS
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
forumsforjustice
|
July 06, 2013
The Top 1% Pro-Amnesty Brethren Immigration Solution (TPBS)

- it's always about the money.

Grover Norquist, Karl Rove, Jeb Bush, the Koch brothers, CAIR, Fox News, Scott Walker, George W. Bush, Rand Paul, Reince Priebus, the 14 Republican Amnesty Pukes who were paid off http://bit.ly/17U4zCM

Along with:

American Action Network.

Americans for a Conservative Direction, led by former Gov. Haley Barbour

Americans for Prosperity Foundation, the Koch brothers’ political group

Faith and Freedom Coalition

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

In an attempt to win Hispanic votes , the Top 1% is supporting Marco Rubio,

for 2016, while promoting S.744, the Senate's Immigration Reform Bill.

Not to mention, their gaining an almost unlimited supply of cheap labor,

while adding additional tax revenues (lest eyes turn back towards them).

S.744 creates up to 57 million new citizens over the next 20 years.

The problem is, it will come at the expense of, we, the people.
Gordo Meis
|
July 03, 2013
anonymous, you seem easily duped, so you must be a liberal. Let me help: King is giving you facts that show the governemnt refuses to do what the laws they pass require. Try hard to understand, OK? And, forgive us if we don't take Harper Polling too seriously? They were set up by the Republican establishment and funded by corporate America to pass amnesty by feeding contrived 'data' to gumps like you.

(Brock McCleary, Harper’s founder and the outgoing polling director of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), says the firm is looking to tap into the same flexible, inexpensive data)

But hold on, the tooth fairy will be at your house soon.
Robert Johnson
|
July 03, 2013
GREAT COLUMN! Amnesty is not good for Republicans. Even Rubio. How will Marco Rubio’s high-profile role promoting amnesty affect his presidential chances? More specifically, will Rubio appeal to Hispanic voters who have voted heavily for Democrats in recent elections?

NO. A new poll suggests Hispandering Rubio would not perform any better among Hispanic voters than Mitt Romney did in 2012. The survey, by the organization Latino Decisions, asked 1,200 Hispanic presidential voters nationwide about various possible 2016 matchups. Sellout Rubio did not come close to competing with possible Democratic rivals.

More poll results on 2016: Among Hispanic voters, Clinton over Ryan 73-21, Clinton over Bush 74-20. ow.ly/mBh9G
Gordo Meis
|
July 03, 2013
WOW- and these people get re-elected. Not by me. I have had enough. Thanks DA!
Marie in Marietta
|
July 03, 2013
D.A. King should be giving classes to the GOP. I hear that the Speaker is trying to wiggle some Republicans into voting for a conference committee compromise that includes amnesty. That would be the end of conssrvatives in the USA.

Hello Tom Price: Vote NO or go back to surgery.
anonymous
|
July 03, 2013
"Public resistance?"

Recent Harper Polling & Public Policy Polling:

◾Across the 29 states, an average of 67.76% of the likely voters polled said they strongly or somewhat support bipartisan immigration reform legislation being debated in Washington;

◾72% of those polled said they strongly or somewhat support a bill that includes a tough but fair path to citizenship like that in the Gang of Eight legislation;

◾57.38% of those polled are more likely to vote for an elected official who supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship – compared to just 21.79% who would be less likely.

◾An overwhelming 87.17% of those polled said it was very or somewhat important that the U.S. fix it’s immigration system this year.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides