Obama’s counterterrorism policies are long on hope
May 29, 2013 12:14 AM | 1895 views | 3 3 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Like many a Barack Obama speech, his first major address of his second term last week on terrorism had a nice ring to it. Yet as The National Review put it, his speech was “long on hope but comparatively short on change, more scholastic navel-gazing than articulation of new policy.”

Obama prefaced his remarks by saying, “Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue.” If there is a policy change in there, it’s hard to find.

As the Review aptly put it, “We suppose that if the president wants to stop talking about this war while continuing to wage it, that’s better than the inverse.”

The biggest anti-terror coup of Obama’s presidency was of course the killing of Osama bin Laden, an event that stemmed from intelligence gleaned via select “waterboardings” of captured al-Qaida figures during the Bush years. Another legacy of the Bush administration is the military-run Guantanamo Bay prison, which Obama has been promising to close ever since he first ran for president in 2008. He repeated that promise again last week.

But Congress refused — on a bipartisan basis — to allow large-scale detainee transfers from Gitmo the last time he tried that maneuver, and isn’t likely to go along now, either.

The fact is that Guantanamo is a destination where the U.S. can sideline dangerous terrorists and enemy combatants indefinitely — men who should not be released to return to the battlefield or to plot the deaths of more Americans.

The president said in his remarks that the use of drones is a legal, effective and necessary anti-terrorism measure. But under new White House guidelines, the drones will be used only if a terrorist suspect represents “an imminent threat” and can’t be captured, he said.

Obama also pledged a new standard for drone use: the “near certainty” that no civilians will be killed or injured. That sounds good, but would be an impossible standard to meet in reality, and one never before met in the history of warfare. Keep in mind as well that the U.S. had bin Laden targeted for a missile strike late in the Clinton presidency, but held off for fear of causing collateral casualties. Just think how different history would have been had someone then had the cojones to “pull the trigger.”

Obama chose an interesting moment — or cynical one, many might say — to focus on national security, what with his administration battered by an unprecedented level of scandal in recent weeks. He touched on two of those scandals (Benghazi and the aggressive targeting of journalists at AP and Fox) in his speech, but only in ways that offered no answers and tried to deflect blame.

The president said Thursday that the U.S. war on terrorist groups, “like all wars, must end. That’s what history advises. It’s what our democracy demands.”

But the fact is that wars do not end until they are won or until both sides agree to stop fighting — regardless of “what history advises” or “what democracy demands” as he absurdly put it. And we are a long way from winning this war. In fact, it is a war that is likely to continue as long as there continue to be radical Islamists — which is something over which we have next to no control.

Barack Obama prematurely declared the war in Iraq “won” and is taking the same approach in Afghanistan. He now seems to be taking the same approach in our efforts to defend against radical Islamic terror. Coming on the heels of the Boston Marathon bombing and butchering of a British soldier last week on the streets of London, that approach seems overly hopeful at best.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dustoff
|
June 02, 2013
Obama and Congress need to take the rose colored glasses off.

The whole bunch of idiots are out of control. None of the new programs are going to make any change but up the taxes.

Someone needs to grasp the situation and put, Holder, Clinton and the dope from IRS in front of a jury.

Then we need to pull our troops out of the Middle East, put them on the borders and order Homeland to start rounding up illegals ans shipping their butts home.

No one more penny should be sent to any country that allows anyone to burn our flag, harbors any known terrorist or refuses to put captured terrorist to death.

Harsh, yeah maybe so but we either get mean or we get tromped on and that is what our so called president and Congress are allowing to happen.
Drone On
|
May 31, 2013
When did Obama EVER declare the war in Iraq won??????????????

Obama has saved this country from a complete meltdown and turned the economy around, killed Bin Laden and 22 of the worst terrorists.

"The second-in-command of the Pakistani Taliban has been killed in a US drone strike, a senior Taliban source told the BBC."



And, he continues to fight smart, not stupid.

Perhaps he should write a book "War for Dummies" for conservatives. Please tell us the ratio of Americans killed per al-Qaeda under Obama compared to Bush. Losers.
anonymous
|
May 29, 2013
Totally trying to divert attention off of his scandals. So tired of him.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides