Goldstein’s bid for building denied by state supreme court
by Lindsay Field
May 07, 2013 12:25 AM | 3579 views | 8 8 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Philip Goldstein
Philip Goldstein
slideshow
MARIETTA — A lawsuit brought against the city by Councilman Philip Goldstein has run into a wall, as the Georgia Supreme Court denied hearing his case to build a five-story building on the Marietta Square.

Mayor Steve Tumlin said he was happy to hear of the court’s ruling and anticipates going after almost $100,000 in legal fees from the lawsuit brought by Goldstein’s Marietta Properties LLC.

In April 2011, Goldstein’s company filed the lawsuit, saying that he should be able to build a five-story building at the 77 North Park Square location he bought in 2001.

Since then, the case was thrown out by a local Superior Court Judge, ruled on twice by the Georgia Court of Appeals and now denied unanimously by the Georgia Supreme Court.

“It is good news to the city … both as to the result and that the process is confirmed,” Tumlin said.

Councilman Anthony Coleman said he too was happy the “city prevailed” and anticipated it from the prior rulings.

Goldstein’s attorney argued that a new downtown height ordinance should not prevent him from erecting a new building, about 66 feet in height on North Park Square, because he had a certificate of approval from the city’s Historic Board of Review when the rule was adopted.

There was no explanation regarding the ruling by the Supreme Court, just simply that the petition by the councilman’s property company was denied.

Goldstein referred all questions and comments to his attorneys at Hallman & Wingate in Marietta, but calls were not returned before press time Monday.

Tumlin said the city will also be going after attorney fees as a result of this two-year suit, and Coleman said he agreed they should be compensated for what the attorney has put into the case.

“We created a litigation committee because of a councilman filing a lawsuit,” he said. “What came out of that is that we’d go after attorney fees like we did with (Waleed “Lee”) Jaraysi. It wouldn’t be fair to do it against Jaraysi and not Goldstein.”

Jaraysi has been locked in litigation with the city since 2007 over the building of a wedding hall off South Marietta Parkway. In November, Jaraysi was ordered to pay $37,500 in legal fees to the city and his attorney Richard Capriola to pay $10,000.

Marietta City Manager Bill Bruton said the most recent estimates his office received from the city’s legal staff for the Goldstein lawsuit is $96,000.

Uncomfortable situation

Tumlin also spoke to a previous statement about asking Goldstein to step down because he had brought a lawsuit against the city.

“It caused some undo tension … he named the council and the mayor as defendants,” Tumlin said. “It’s not a comfortable situation.”

The mayor wouldn’t say if that was something he still felt should happen but reiterated that it made for some awkward council meetings.

“It’s hard enough for eight people with their ideas and concepts of Marietta without throwing in a lawsuit,” he said. “Originally I thought, you’re either with us or you’re not.”

And if Tumlin could essentially decide what would become of the former Cuthbertson building, he’d just request that it stay within the height recommendations as outlined by the ordinance with a façade that’s historical in nature.

“I personally liked the old Cuthbertson building, but it stayed empty for about seven or eight years,” he said. “I wish the renovation has been addressed 10 or 12 years ago to save that building.”

Case goes to court

Goldstein’s Marietta Properties LLC sued the city in April 2011, saying that he should be able to build a five-story building at the North Park Square location. He never applied for a building permit for the spot.

Cobb Superior Court Judge George Kreeger threw out the case in June 2011, but the councilman’s attorney’s then filed an appeal with the Georgia Court of Appeals.

The state appeals court sided with Kreeger in an August 2011 ruling and again in a December 2011 reconsideration.

This past December, Goldstein’s attorneys filed a petition with the Georgia Supreme Court asking for another decision on the ruling, and on Monday it was unanimously denied.

The 1917-era building, named after the late Dr. Paul Cuthbertson, who was an optometrist, was bought by Goldstein’s company in 2001 for about $575,000 and demolished in fall 2010.

In March 2011, Goldstein said he had planned to build a 22,000-square-foot, five-story, mixed use building that would reach about 66 feet in height.

Goldstein argued in the past that he never requested a building permit for the property because he didn’t want to waste money on the design.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Just Sayin......
|
May 08, 2013
ENOUGH of this Phil.....just stop. You are making a mockery of yourself and your families good name. Either that, or it is time for you to resign your public office, but you are in the wrong here and it is time to move on. No one in your family is probably telling you this, but someone needs to.
Old Mayretta
|
May 07, 2013
How is this not a conflict of interest sitting on the city council while suing the very city you work for? What a D bag!
Watcher...
|
May 07, 2013
Don't you just love people telling a Property Owner what to do with his property.
jesse james
|
May 07, 2013
The last sentence of the article says it all:

"Goldstein argued in the past that he never requested a building permit for the property because he didn’t want to waste money on the design.

MAY-RETTA SURVIVOR
|
May 07, 2013
Why not tear down Gold$tein and put up a person?
should pay
|
May 07, 2013
Of course Goldstein should pay the legal fees. Maybe he will stop the lawsuits if he has to pay his own way! We certainly should not have to pick up the tab.
Church Streeter
|
May 07, 2013
Phillip:

Please put some money into your other buildings around the Square to attract some quality tenants...take down or rehab that old "Charades" sign. It's becoming an eyesore on what's otherwise a pretty nice block.

Thanks.
John A
|
May 07, 2013
Why mar the otherwise picturesque square with another tall building. The courthouse is bad enough. Where does it stop?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides