Loyalty is good, but blind loyalty can be fatal
by Melvyn L. Fein
More Opinion Contributor
April 01, 2013 12:23 AM | 1081 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As MDJ readers may know, I have been highly exercised by Barack Obama’s about-face on the subject of the national debt. Whereas four years ago, he described George W. Bush’s $6 trillion smaller debt as unpatriotic and immoral, he now views the current obligation as unproblematic.

This turning on a dime to fit momentary political needs strikes me as both dishonest and destructive. Absolutely contrary to our collective interests, it places Obama’s desire to destroy his rivals above the interests of the rest of us — especially our children and grandchildren.

But then something else occurred to me. I was reminded of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact that preceded World War II. This accord, which freed Hitler’s hands to attack the West, also included a section that allowed Germany and Russia to divide Poland between them.

Before this deal was reached, the Communists had been adamant anti-Nazis. They had castigated Hitler and his henchmen as the scum of the earth. But then, quite suddenly, Hitler was rehabilitated. Now he was a statesman of the first order.

This change clearly served Stalin’s interests. He was justifiably frightened of Germany’s aggressive intentions and wished to buy time by appeasing his potential foe. According to his calculations, this would provide the breathing space needed to beef up his own forces.

Meanwhile, across the pond in the United States, Stalin’s communist allies were listening to their master’s voice. Almost immediately, their attitude toward Hitler was transformed. Leaping to stay in step with the party line, they too became more respectful of the Nazi dictator.

Which brings us to the contemporary America. When Obama did his U-turn, so did loyal Democrats. Both in and out of Congress, they declared that there was no spending problem. Yes, the national debt was large, but not so large that the nation could not easily absorb it.

This, of course, was disingenuous. Democrats could do the math. They had to realize, along with the congressional budget office, that the debt trajectory was unsustainable. Yet this realization paled in comparison with their short-term political objectives.

Whatever the long-term risks, they calculated that they could kick the can a bit further down road without precipitating an immediate crisis. They, along with their leader, reckoned that this would enable them to blame Republicans for being stingy — at least until the mid-term election delivered both houses of Congress into their hands. And so the party loyalists turned on a dime. Without fully thinking through the implications of their reversal, they fell into lockstep. This, it seems to me, is just as dangerous as Obama’s inconsistency; just as dangerous as the faithfulness of communist fellow travelers to Stalin eight decades ago.

Loyalty is a good thing, but blind loyalty can be fatal. Too many Americans reflexively close ranks with the party of their usual choice. Instead of paying attention to the issues at stake, they, like their mentors, are more concerned with defeating political enemies.

Nevertheless, I refuse to believe that moderate liberals cannot bring themselves to see the looming dangers. They too, after all, are capable of understanding the implications of the Greek and Cypriote meltdowns. These may be tiny countries, yet the lessons of partisan irresponsibility are huge.

Radical liberals, however, are another matter. They routinely dismiss the consequences of fiscal mismanagement. As moral warriors, they are like the Viking berserkers who blindly rushed into battle swinging their axes, oblivious of the adjacent dangers.

The question is, what of the rest of us? Will we follow their lead? Will we continue to kowtow to national authority figures irrespective of what they say? Or will more of us begin thinking for ourselves?

Back in the 1930s, Americans who bothered to notice what Hitler was doing were mortified. Will enough of us today be sufficiently alarmed by contemporary developments to stand against them? We will see.

Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D., is a professor of sociology at Kennesaw State University.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
April 01, 2013
Since the start of fiscal year 2011, President Barack Obama has signed into law approximately $2.4 trillion of deficit reduction for the years 2013 through 2022. Nearly three-quarters of that deficit reduction is in the form of spending cuts, while the remaining one-quarter comes from revenue increases.
anonymous
|
April 02, 2013
Please tell us what these are. Thank you
East Cobb Senior
|
April 02, 2013
This is another classic example of rhetoric without substantiation. This commenter follows the same line of malarkey we see coming out of the White House spin machine. Words, words, words without any meaning or substance. They say it and people like the commenter sucks it in like a sponge and regurgitates it as gospel. Melvyn your article was directed at just such mindless, blindless,people.
anonymous
|
April 02, 2013
Now I hear they do not have all the Obamacare things set up for 2014 so rather than say it has to be delayed they will push it out so costs will be higher. I can't wait to see what the King does when everyone finally realizes what is going on and how much more they will pay for the wonderful plan. Of course by then the waning days of his time in office will have him not worrying but the Democrats better start coming up with a new diversion
Ron Jeremy
|
April 01, 2013
One term explains it- Lemmings.
East Cobb Senior
|
April 01, 2013
Melvin, you have very succinctly described the old proverb "There are none so blind as those that will not see. "This proverb was probably derived from the Old Testament scripture Jeremiah 5:21 ‘Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not’. How prophetic, as a nation we fit that text from scripture without modification.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides