No mortgage, hidden cost
by William G. Lako Jr.
Columnist
March 08, 2013 12:00 AM | 1636 views | 1 1 comments | 29 29 recommendations | email to a friend | print
William G. Lako Jr.<br>Business Columnist
William G. Lako Jr.
Business Columnist
slideshow
I thought perhaps my series on mortgages was over, until I came across a survey in The Wall Street Journal that asked whether readers would pay cash for a house if they had the money. Surprisingly, 71 percent of readers would pay cash for their home. I agree it certainly sounds nice to own your home outright and never have a mortgage payment. However, from a financial planning perspective, paying cash is not always the best choice.

One benefit that comes with owning a home is the mortgage interest deduction on your taxes. You can generally deduct the interest that you pay on debt resulting from a loan used to buy, build, or improve your home, provided that the loan is secured by your home.

I suppose you could argue that tax laws change every few years or so, and that it seems someone proposes eliminating or significantly limiting the mortgage interest deduction.

Instead, let’s look at the opportunity cost of not carrying a mortgage. Perhaps you have $200,000 in cash, and you want a $200,000 home. You could pay for the home outright, or you could put $40,000 down and finance the remaining 80 percent. Assuming a 4 percent interest rate on a 30-year mortgage, your monthly payment would be $763.86. However, you have decided you want to live debt free. You pay cash for your home and you add $763.86 monthly to your savings, which you invest. Assuming a conservative 8 percent average annual return on your investment, in 30 years you should have around $1,138,000. Not too shabby.

Alternately, if you decided to carry a mortgage, you could invest the $160,000 you did not use to buy the house. Assuming the same 8 percent average annual return on your investment, in 30 years when your mortgage is paid off, your investment should grow to about $1,749,000. You could be looking at an additional $611,000 in 30 years!

I know, you’re thinking, who buys a home and actually stays in it for 30 years? Let’s say after 10 years, you decide to move. Let’s also assume the house has increased in value and you were able to sell it for $280,000. If you paid for your home in cash and invested the equivalent of your mortgage payment each month, you should have about $140,000, assuming you earned an 8 percent return on your investment. Adding the $280,000 from the sale of your home to your savings should bring your total $420,000.

If you chose to pay a mortgage and invested your cash at 8 percent, your original $160,000 should be about $355,000. After 10 years, your mortgage payoff should be around $126,000. If you were able to sell the home for $280,000, you should make a profit of $154,000. Adding that to your investment, you should have $509,000. Even after 10 years, you could still come out ahead by nearly $89,000 by choosing to carry a mortgage.

Now you may think an 8 percent return on your investment is impossible in this economy. However, on Tuesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at an all-time high. Also consider from the bottom of the Great Recession on March 9, 2009, the Dow is up 142 percent, or 24.91 percent on an annualized basis. Looking 10 years back, the Dow is up 134.94 percent, or 8.92 percent on an annualized basis.

William G. Lako Jr., CFP, is an executive in residence at Kennesaw State University’s Coles College of Business and a principal at Henssler Financial. Lako is a certified financial planner.The Cherokee Tribune will periodically publish columns from KSU business faculty.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Common Sense Trumps
|
March 09, 2013
Articles like this were the norm before the Great Recession. Theoretically, his idea trumps, the only problem is modern financial "experts" analyze economic growth in the contest of the last last 85 years (since 1929), without noting specific decades decades throughout the 20th Century where the stock market was as stuck as Pooh Bear in Rabbit's house. This goes without mentioning the financial panics of 1907, 1873, 1857, 1893, AND the dozens of other financial panics scattered throughout our nation's history. Once upon a time, the Bond Market was more profitable than the Stock Market.

What I find most troubling is that our country is swarming with financial experts (MBAs, CFPs etc,) yet some how our Governments and many Corporations are unable to balance their budgets and remain fiscally sound.

In the fall of 2008 the market fell 30% in one quarter due to "financial crisis, debt crisis, credit crisis" etc. Where were the experts to warn people???

Mortgage debt is compound interest in reverse. If a person were paying 4% interest on a mortgage, and the value of the home was increasing, one could easily have MORE than an 8% return due on prepaying a mortgage do to interest savings (which is a tax free return) and the value of the home increasing year over year, which is another TAX FREE RETURN. The tax advantage of keeping a 30 year mortgage is minor compared these factors Why don't "Advisors" grant their clients a proper view on this knowledge.

Pay your home off, and keep it paid off. treat it like a TAX FREE INVESTMENT BOND. Virtually every Balanced mutual fund in existence invests a significant portion in Bonds, which long to perform as a Pre-paid mortgage, PLUS you earn a return TAX FREE.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides