If I understand correctly the intent behind the Second Amendment was to ensure that the citizens would be able to defend themselves or our country against any invasion or attack from any aggressors or from an oppressive government. If that be the case, it would seem to me that you should arm yourself with the most effective type of firearm available, such as the much criticized assault rifles or weapons with large capacity magazines, not B.B. guns. I doubt any attackers would limit themselves to weak weapons and would think twice before starting any type of fight.
Jim Arnold
Senior Chief Petty Officer (Ret.)
U.S. Navy
Powder Springs











Follow us on Twitter!
Jeez.
you can use your pistol, which should be sufficient. When our Constitution was written, our founding fathers did not have all these weapons and thus comparing word for word then and now is tricky and up to interpretation.
Besides limiting the type of guns one can own, we should be looking at what can make our schools and everyone safer like- school entryways with steel doors & very little glass that restricts intruders from entering, better screening to obtain a weapons permit, and the BIG ONE, which is help with treatment for our mentally ill citizens of ALL ages. We place a big priority on treating cancer and heart problems, but NOT on the mentally ill. Rosalyn Carter was right in 1977.
What we have now is a society awash with guns whether we like it or not.