Status quo after election demands leadership from the president
by Don McKee
Columnist
November 09, 2012 12:24 AM | 1328 views | 2 2 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
It was an election that changed almost nothing.

A majority of Americans voted for the status quo, endorsing the president despite the dismal economy that should have done him in. So Barack Obama stays in the White House, Democrats keep control of the Senate and Republicans still control the House.

It was not “the economy, stupid,” the catch phrase of political strategist James Carville that worked in 1992 when Bill Clinton unseated President George H. W. Bush. Instead, the groups that voted overwhelmingly for Obama had other agendas. Latinos, now 10 percent of the electorate, went for Obama over Mitt Romney 71 percent to 27 percent, the Pew Hispanic Center reports. It was the highest for a Democratic candidate since 1996 when Bill Clinton got 72 percent of that vote.

Why? In a word, immigration. It was no contest because Obama scored a knockout with his June executive order blocking deportation of illegal immigrants under age 30 who came here when under 16, essentially implementing the DREAM Act. Romney said he favored “self-deportation” and would cancel Obama’s leniency move.

Would Romney have won if he had chosen as running mate Marco Rubio, the charismatic young U.S. senator from Florida? It would have sent a strong message to Latinos — if the GOP won Rubio would be a heartbeat from the presidency and poised for a run in his own right. Rubio talked about a DREAM Act alternative but dropped it after Obama’s executive order. It’s clear that Republicans must work to bring more Latinos and other minorities into the party tent.

However, other factors were at play in this election. First, it is very, very difficult to unseat an incumbent president, and this election confirms the conventional wisdom. It also holds in local and state elections across the board. It was a big hurdle for Mitt Romney. Second, the Obama campaign succeeded in defining Romney as a Wall Street type concerned about profits, not people. Once again, a vicious smear campaign by Democrats mounted a merciless attack on a good and decent man. He — and America — deserved better. Third, the Democrats got out their voters, even beating the 2008 turnout.

Now the same folks are back in Washington facing the same fiscal cliff that loomed before the election. Harry Reid, the Dem Senate leader, is still talking class warfare, tax the rich. House Speaker John Boehner is saying Republicans are willing to put tax reform on the table, proposing to close special-interest loopholes, for one thing. The overriding question: will Barack Obama show the leadership needed?

Speaker Boehner’s challenge is right on:

“Mr. President, this is your moment. We’re ready to be led, not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans. We want you to lead — not as a liberal or a conservative, but as the President of the United States of America. We want you to succeed. Let’s challenge ourselves to find the common ground that has eluded us. Let’s rise above the dysfunction and do the right thing together for our country in a bipartisan way.”

dmckee9613@aol.com

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Luek
|
November 09, 2012
Actually, I am sort of glad Obongo got 4 more years. That to me means I have gotten along since 2008 without a President so it can be done. Belgium for various reasons has not had a national government for sometime now and they seem to be doing okay without one. So, Obongo may be a blessing in disguise in that his hideous administration may just wean Americans off of big national government. Big national government was not the original intent of the founding fathers anyway.
Irrelevant Voter
|
November 09, 2012
Thanks, Mr. McKee. Your paper's progressive columnist has taken the Harry Reid approach. I appreciate this analysis much more.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides