Hurricane Sandy provides case for Obama
by Bill Press
November 05, 2012 12:00 AM | 1893 views | 2 2 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
We knew an October Surprise was coming. We just didn’t know whether it would come from the Romney campaign or the Obama campaign. In the end, it came from neither. The October Surprise came from Mother Nature, instead, in the form of Hurricane Sandy.

Slamming into the East Coast just one week before Nov. 6, Hurricane Sandy left behind more than a path of death and destruction. In many ways, it also directly impacted the campaign. Both camps were forced to cancel campaign events. States suspended early voting. Some polling places had to be relocated. For several days, the news media ignored politics and devoted all its attention to storm coverage. And Mitt Romney was shuttled off to the sidelines, while President Obama returned to the White House and looked — presidential.

But, beyond the physical, Sandy had a much more powerful impact. She also left behind a powerful message: Beware of Mitt Romney! Because nothing better than Hurricane Sandy illustrates the central issue of this presidential campaign and the fundamental difference between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.

It boils down to this: Obama believes there’s an important role for the federal government. Romney believes every problem is better handled by the states or private business. That’s his entire approach to governance.

On Medicaid, says Romney, give it to the states. Let them handle it. Medicare? Give people a voucher and let them tangle with private insurance companies. Auto manufacturers in trouble? No federal help on the way; let them fail. Roe v. Wade? Overturn it, get the federal government out of the picture, and let each state decide. Same with health care. Leave it up to the states. Some will; some won’t. So what?

Now here’s where Hurricane Sandy comes in. Believe it or not, Romney’s tea party, hate-the-government philosophy even extends to disaster relief. There’d be no need for FEMA in Romney’s world. He’d turn emergency response to natural disasters over to states, to be handled 50 different ways.

On June 13, 2011, in one of the many GOP primary debates, Romney was asked directly by CNN’s John King about disaster relief following the tornado that struck Joplin, Mo. “FEMA is about to run out of money and there are some people who say do it on a case-by-case basis and some people who say, you know, maybe we’re learning a lesson here that the states should take on more of this role.”

No doubt where Romney stands: “Absolutely. Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better.” Romney went on to say it was “immoral” for the federal government to spend more money on anything, including disaster relief, that would add to the deficit. (At the same time, it’s OK to add to the deficit by extending the Bush tax cuts. But, I digress.)

Of course, Romney’s position on disaster relief mirrors that of House Republicans, who over the last two years slashed by 43 percent the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. The Ryan budget would further cut into FEMA’s budget, as would across-the-board cuts looming as a result of the Republican-inspired sequestration, due to kick in January 1.

On FEMA, Romney’s now trying to have it both ways. Once he realized that, in light of Hurricane Sandy, his June 2011 pitch for transferring all responsibility to the states might come back to bite him in the behind, he quickly denied wanting to eliminate FEMA. Yet the very next day, he refused — 14 times! — to answer reporters’ questions about whether or not he would retain the agency.

But Romney didn’t fool New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. Forced to choose between a president who offered disaster relief and a wannabe who thinks the federal government should get out of the disaster relief business, Christie didn’t hesitate to throw Romney under the bus. He realizes what a disaster it would be if states ravaged by a tornado or hurricane were left to cope on their own, with no federal help.

Hurricane Sandy reminds us what’s at stake in this election and how wrong Mitt Romney is in his disdain for government. The New York Times summed it up best: “A big storm requires big government.” There is no other way.

Bill Press is host of a nationally-syndicated radio show.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
stan chaz
November 05, 2012
Hurricane Sandy has done of us all a favor-

by causing us to focus on Romney's skewed thinking:

Consider Romney’s advice for storm & disaster survivors:

"Don’t be a victim, and stop looking for handouts!"

And.... ask your parents for help!

Heck, Romney will dismantle FEMA and the EPA

(= more $$$ for his people/corporations).

Leave it to the states, he says.

Yeah, sure. The damage from Katrina was FOUR times Louisiana’a state budget!

Maybe Romney will make us dams.... out of his used Etch-A-Sketches?

What we need is a tidal wave.......of voters.....

to sweep these kind of guys out of power.

THAT is the BEST way to help the victims of present and future Sandys.

...AND ....the best way to help yourself, and your family.

Obama does not dismiss 47% of America like Romney.

Obama says: This is not a Republican America.

This is not a Democratic America.

This is the UNITED States of America.

p.s. This is not mere rhetoric. For in many ways, Mitt Romney's opposition to federal disaster relief programs is what the election is all about. President Barack Obama supports using government to help those in a crisis get back on their feet. Mitt Romney believes that government has no role in helping people who are dealing with disaster. Those two very different views of America's future are on the ballot next week. Your choice. Choose well.

Choose as if your life depended on it.

Because some just might.

We know from Mitt's values (or lack of them) that he's not a Christian.

But heck, he's not even a Mormon. Come on Mitt, let’s be honest:


And your saints are those who have the most money

..... those who want to BUY this ELECTION - and this COUNTRY

......and TO HELL with the rest of us.

They try to drown us out with their dollars.

But WE still have a voice. And it’s called our VOTE.

We need a President for ALL the people -

NOT a President of the wealthy, by the wealthy,

and for the wealthy. And for sure, that ain’t you Mitt.....
Devlin Adams
November 05, 2012
Hogwash, Stan. You are as delisional as Prezs.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides