Obama, Clinton criminally negligent on Libya
October 21, 2012 01:51 AM | 1283 views | 2 2 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

Many of us remember in 1993 during the Clinton administration the tragic death of American soldiers in Somalia that has been immortalized in the story of Blackhawk Down. We watched as the body of an American soldier was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu. Secretary of Defense Les Aspin had refused the request for additional resources to provide cover for the soldiers on the ground. As a result of his failure to respond to the call for help and the resulting deaths, he was forced to resign.

Nineteen years later we have the same exact situation with the brutal torture and murder of an American ambassador and the murder of three other Americans at our consulate in Libya. We all saw pictures of the ambassadors’ body. The parallel of the refusal to protect the soldiers in Mogadishu and the consulate staff in Libya had to be immediately and unmistakable to President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton. Why else do they now insist on casting blame on intelligence sources after initially and shamelessly trying to offer a video as the cause?

Some are asking whether the president is using the video along with the “We didn’t know” defense for re-election or ideological purposes. This misses the core of issue.

The Obama administration had placed Americans in a documented, physically vulnerable consulate that had already been attacked in 2012 and requests for added protection were denied. Action in response to the call for additional protection would probably have deferred the terrorists or at least have prevented the four deaths.

I believe this administration’s collective attempts to blame first a video and then others for the failure to respond to calls for protection is because they recognize what occurred is tantamount to criminal negligence, even if they are shielded by law. At least in 1993 there was some small measure of accountability.

Sadly this president will not even ask for the resignation of Secretary of State Clinton nor, I believe, will she will even offer it. Their political fortunes are tied together no matter how much they may not like it.

Roger Chagnon
East Cobb
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Wsst Cobber
|
October 22, 2012
You just can't stay on subject can you Foley? What on earth does the war in Iraq have to do with the sacrafice of 4 Americans on embassy duty? And who sent the UN ambassador out to ALL of the Sunday talk shows to blame a video for the "demonstration", causing the man who made the video to be taken into custody and paraded before the media? And more importantly, is this the intelligence community they are blaming whoa re teh saem ones that say Iran is no where near having the "bomb". Sure, everyone should believe them on that - but on Libya they were wrong. And you libs sure didn't give Bush any wiggle room when all of the intelligence here and abroad said that Saddam had WMD's. Strange how the "intelligence" is right or wrong, depending obviously on which party is in power and which one the media supports
Kevin Foley
|
October 21, 2012
Before Obama asks for the resignation of Clinton, he should ask for the resignations of Rep. Darrell Issa and the other Republicans in the House who voted to cut the State Department budget that funded diplomatic security.

And while Mr. Chagnon is walking down memory lane, where's his "outrage" over the senseless 10-year, $1 trillon war in Iraq that took the lives of 4,500 young Americans and maimed tens of thousands of others?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides