If calendar isn’t broke, don’t fix it
by Pete Borden
Columnist
October 16, 2012 12:00 AM | 1011 views | 6 6 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
At the outset, I need to say that if you are one of the readers who complain about columns concerning the school calendar, you might want to stop reading now. If, however, you believe, as I do, that the issue is too important to be ignored, and our school board too dysfunctional to properly deal with it on its own, then continue reading.

The long awaited report from the much ballyhooed 21 member committee is in. Surprise! Surprise! There were no surprises! They offered a number of options, all with one thing in common. You see, the committee was “pre-tasked” to recommend a calendar which provided, in the words of the head of the committee, Dr. Angela Huff, a lot of breaks. Therefore, the calendar options considered never included retaining the current “compromise” calendar, a result of what might be called a “one-sided compromise” (if such a thing exists) and which has school starting the middle of August. It came about in an effort to appease both sides in a battle over whether to start school the first Monday in August or the Tuesday after Labor Day. Unfortunately, only one of the sides was willing to accept the compromise and move on.

During the last meeting, we learned that the committee recommended at least two calendars, Superintendent Michael Hinojosa presented a third, board member David Banks, to nobody’s surprise, offered a fourth and veteran board member Alison Bartlett presented a fifth. They all had one thing in common. Practically nobody liked them other than the one or ones proposing them. So, at this time, we have no calendar which is popular with a majority. Is that surprising?

With a certainty of one, and possibly two, new board members in just three months, it really would be unethical indeed, if not illegal, to vote now on this issue, which has little to do with anyone who is leaving the board. The only real reason to push for the vote now is that someone feels they have the backing to produce their desired result with the present board. The irony is that, unless someone switches sides in defiance of their campaign promises, having the vote now will result in retaining the current calendar, which still appears to be the middle ground between two forces.

Dr. Hinojosa suggests a one year calendar, so that the next one to be set would not be an election year issue. That is a reasonable suggestion. A better suggestion would be to stay with the current calendar for one more year, and take that time to do some real research into what the high achievers do. You would be surprised.

Recently, I went online and selected, at random, four school districts in different parts of the country, all in high ranking states educationally. After checking their calendars, I found that one started school in late July, one on the Tuesday after Labor Day and the other two after the middle of August. I suggest that an in-depth study of the successful school districts would be of great benefit to the CCSD.

Several facts need to be kept in mind. First, the school board, in agreeing to the formation of the 21-member committee, assumed no obligation to abide by its recommendations. The setting of the school calendar is the sole prerogative of the school board. The board is under no obligation to please the superintendent, the parents or the employees of the district, including teachers. Their sole responsibility is to set a calendar that will enhance and facilitate the education of our children.

Secondly, references to what the committee wants are ludicrous because it has already admitted the purpose was not finding a calendar which complemented the stated responsibility of the school board. It was simply to provide a calendar with a lot of breaks.

Third, references to the Monkey Survey, taken some time back, are equally as ludicrous. It has been pointed out, time and again, that people voted multiple times from different computers, people from outside the county tainted the results, and the most damning of all, somewhere around 120 percent of our teachers voted.

Little of what I have said here is new. However, it appears nobody is listening, so it bears repeating until someone does.

We have a calendar that works, that gives adequate breaks and allows for ample time to teach our kids. As my Grandpa would say, “Then why in the Sam Hill are we trying to change it?”

Pete Borden is a retired masonry contractor.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Here's the thing
|
October 17, 2012
Pete fancies himself as Cobb's Don Quixote. Problem

is the Man of La Mancha's eyesight was 20/20 in

comparison to Pete's, who will most likely tilt at

anything resembling change or progress. Knight

Errant for sure.
Drone strike
|
October 16, 2012
Launch enough drones at the same target and maybe

someday you'll hit it, whether you need to or not.

Drone on Brother. At least you're committed.
Cobb Gran
|
October 16, 2012
Mr. Borden you don't want to hear it, but I do think some breaks during the school year are good for the students and the teachers. I am a grandparent and children and parents today are involved in more things today than when I attended Cobb County schools in the 60s. Surely you will agree to that. Also, practically no Mothers worked when I attended school.

But my idea doesn't use all 10 days, which make up the Fall Break and the February break. Why not use 4 or 6 days and give a long weekend at the end of Sept. or the beginning of October? And then a long weekend the end of February? You could still start school more to the middle of August.

A schedule needs to be decided upon and go with that schedule for more than one year. In this busy world, people make many plans at least a year out. Large corporations particularly want their employees to turn in their vacation requests at least 6 months in advance. Some even farther out.

Dr. Hinojosa and school Board Members, get it together and stop playing politics with the school calendar.
Cobb & NY Teacher
|
October 21, 2012
Perfectly stated. It's amazing how many people forget to apply a little common sense. Students, parents and teachers need a little break. A little break to allow the kids to be kids and a family to act as a family. Children today are asked to push themselves to the fullest extent in school as well as extracurricular activities. This is good practice as long as they can "come up for air". Not only that, but a 4 day break can help break the illness cycles that strike our schools. Right now, fatigue has weakened the kids' immune systems allowing them to catch strep throat, mono, stomach bugs, colds, bronchitis... A break would allow these children to rest their bodies and brains so they can perform better in school!
Double Negative
|
October 16, 2012
Pete:

You've outdone your negative commentary with a beauty...

"not illegal" ?????

It's either "legal," which it is.

Or, it's "illegal," which it isn't.

Your attempt to suggest illegality continues to stir the pot on this issue.
Devlin Adams
|
October 16, 2012
I am pretty sure, Borden doesn;t nee a lesson grammar from you.

While we are at it, can you provide documentable evidence that it is legal? I didn't think so.

By the way, "illegal" is an adjective used to describe an act that is against the law. In a questionable situation, such as this, it is certainly proper to conjecture on whether or not it fits the description. There is no double negative involved.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides