Chick-Fil-A - Liberals’ double-standard on full display
August 01, 2012 12:01 AM | 5642 views | 58 58 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
“We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit.”

With those innocuous words, Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy last week set off a firestorm of invective in his direction from those on the left who never miss an opportunity to bash and trash traditional Christianity — especially if they can push the Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender agenda in the process.

Never mind that Cathy’s outlook should come as no surprise to anyone remotely familiar with his family’s Atlanta-based restaurant chain, which foregoes millions of dollars in potential revenues each week by choosing to close on Sundays. Cathy and his father, chain founder Truett Cathy, have never for a moment tried to closet their conservative beliefs.

You’ll note that Dan Cathy said nothing about planning to treat LGBT customers any differently than other customers. Yet his implied criticism of the push for gay marriage was sufficient to make him and his chain a sudden pariah to many liberals.

As noted elsewhere on these pages, big-city mayors suddenly indicated that businesses that were not overtly LGBT-friendly were not welcome in their cities.

Among the most critical was Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, even though, as columnist Cal Thomas notes nearby, Emanuel has cozied up to openly anti-Semitic demagogue Louis Farrakhan, who is notoriously anti-gay. But then, Farrakhan is not a conservative Christian, so he’s not a legitimate target for those on the left.

Moreover, let’s not forget that Rahm was chief of staff for President Obama until earlier this year — who at the time held the same position on gay marriage as Cathy. So would Obama have been allowed to open an eatery in Chicago had his position not “evolved” earlier this year?

It all goes to prove there’s nobody more intolerant these days than some liberals.

All Dan Cathy did was have the courage to say to a reporter what the majority of Americans still believe: that marriage was meant to be between a man and a woman. In return he has been scalded by “progressives,” whose goal is to browbeat and intimidate anyone with differing views into acquiescing with their supposedly enlightened worldview. And they are egged on by President Obama, whose administration has bludgeoned Catholics for failing to embrace his new requirement that even faith-based institutions must provide contraceptive coverage in their employee health-care plans.

Fox News commentator Mike Huckabee is urging people to eat at Chick-fil-A today to show support for Cathy and for free speech.

To that we say “Eat More Chicken.”
Comments
(58)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Do the right Thing
|
August 07, 2012
What Dan Cathy really did was start the beginning of the end for Chick-fil-a.

I hope Truitt Cathy his father, who worked all those years to build this business, has enough class to come forward and apologize for the ignorance of his son.
Pam J
|
August 07, 2012
Dan Cathy is not ignorant. He just apparently has a different opinion than you. You probably aren't ignorant, just intolerant.
tyler durden
|
August 06, 2012
First, I'm a good old fashioned democrat. However, this Chick-Fil-A thing is just dumb. It was turned into a manufactured controversy by the media, then jumped on by politicians craving some press. The EXTREME left took the bait and started mouthing off and then the EXTREME right chimed in and mouthed off more....it's ridiculous. I have to believe that there are more of us - thinking democrats and republicans- that can handle one person legally voicing his opinion. Maybe we should go back to the actual problems we face (like putting food on the table) and quit getting sucked in to fake, shallow controversies...
anonymous
|
August 02, 2012
I love Chic-fil-a. I'll eat there when I want. The gay community protests too much. I think it is because they know deep down it is abnormal. If they can convince others it is normal, maybe in their hearts they will think it is. But, nope, bilogy teaches me it is not. Homosexuality is just a personal preference/attraction. Nothing more. And, no matter how hard you try, I'll always know this (you will too).
TerranceD
|
August 02, 2012
Replace the word gay and homosexuality with the word Christian and Christianity and one could make the exact same argument about you. Funny how that works. The only difference is that no one in the gay community is donating millions of dollars to see that your opinions or beliefs are taken away, or trying to criminalize them. I'm sure if they were you'd feel the same way they do.
Kim Huffman
|
August 03, 2012
So say the little voices in your head...
SG68
|
August 02, 2012
These mayor's and others like them (i.e. Bloomberg of NYC) are simply abusing their elected office to promote their own personal views.

Regardless of whether their views on certain issues are right or wrong they shouldn't use their "bully pulpit" to broadcast or try to enforce them.

It is just WRONG!!

Vote NO on TSPLOST!!!

Oh I forgot!! We already squashed that bug!!!

Dumberer and dumb
|
August 02, 2012
Wait....let me get this straight. Politicians shouldn't voice their actual opinions about public policy issues? What is this....some sort of uber-PC way to get our political officeholders to take no stand whatsoever about anything and leave the voters with NOTHING about which to vote on other than party affiliation ? So, when GW Bush voiced his opposition to stem cell research...he should have just kept his mouth shut, right?

Yours is probably the most absurd (amongst a world-class set of) inputs to this topic.
CobbCoGuy
|
August 02, 2012
Dumberer and dumb,

I could be wrong. I've been wrong before; just ask the wife. But methinks Bush was not necessarily against stem cell research, but against the FUNDING of such with tax payer money. That's a different ball of wax than the current CFA saga.

What is getting my panties in a wad is Rahm Emanuel, et al, using their position as mayor to rail against, and attempting to damage, CFA and the Cathy family - private citizens and a private business.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, don't you find it odd that Rahm Emanuel was, at the same time, welcoming Louis Farrakhan who has a history of anti-semitic remarks? Granted, Farrakhan and his folks were there in an attempt to stop the violence currently taking place in Chicago's streets - a worthy cause.

But building a business that will employ folks, pay taxes, etc. is a worthy cause, also. I might add, CFA is a business that serves healthy stuff! Don't get me wrong, I do have my Big Mac attacks now and then, but a good ol' chicky sammich has fewer calories and less fat, I believe. Michelle and Bloomberg should be supporting CFA! ;) Can you get 32oz drinks there?

So, to summarize, Bush's goal was to use policy - tax policy - to push his agenda. Rahm Emanuel, et al, are using their clout as mayors against private citizens to push their agenda. That is thuggery, no?

Please help us reconcile this seemingly hypocritical conundrum.
SG68
|
August 02, 2012
@dumberer and dumb

If they had prefaced their remarks with the statement that these were their personal opinions then no problem.

That is, in fact, what George Bush did.

These characters are taking to the podium and presumedly speaking for their cities and all of their citizens.

When they take the stage as elected mayors of those cities they are held to a higher standard of accountability.

Are you trying tell me that they have the right to insinuate that all of their citizens hold the same viewpoint.

Because that is exactly what they did.

They are mayors not dictators, although with some of these guys you wouldn't know it.

Get a grip and come back from the uber liberal fantasy universe in which you are dwelling.
SG you got it wrong
|
August 03, 2012
Say what?...GW Bush just "left it at" only expressing his opinion on this topic of stem cell research?

This was in fact the first VETO of Bush's presidency....he vetoed a bill passed by both houses of Congress with bi-partisan support (and supported by the vast majority of the public) because he was of the personal opinion that there was a moral problem with the use of embryonic stem cells for research into cures for a host of afflictions.

So, you were totally OK with him turning opinion into policy but not OK with these other elected officials doing the same? This is the same blind spot all the right wingers have on this free speech topic.....remember your boycotting of the Dixie Chicks after they dared to speak freely? No free speech allowed for them...but Chicken Boy gets all the intolerant free speech he can possibly sneak around his mouthful of over-processed fried chicken ?
CobbCoGuy
|
August 02, 2012
The positions and beliefs of the Cathy family were virtually unknown until the mayors of Chicago and Boston chimed in. The Cathys are entitled to their beliefs and they are entitled to have their business contribute to causes supporting their beliefs. This is all first amendment stuff which is NOT the issue.

The issue is the actions of the mayors. If said mayors don't support the Cathy's beliefs, then they shouldn't buy their products, and leave it at that.

Unfortunately, that is not the progressive way. Instead, they (the mayors) must vilify an entire corporation that provides jobs, pays taxes and contributes to charities. But it's really worse. The mayors, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS MAYORS, vilified Chick-fil-A.
TerranceD
|
August 02, 2012
Cathy's opinions weren't known until he opened his mouth and spewed his nonsense. I agree that mayors coming out against CFA is a bit short sighted but Cathy brought this on himself.
CobbCoGuy
|
August 02, 2012
Terrence,

It appears you and I agree :)

Since you probably won't be patronizing CFA, perhaps you and I could meet at your favorite tavern and raise a glass in support of the First Amendment!

Cheers!
mjtailorsmom
|
August 01, 2012
The only people twisting Christianity are those who say the Bible says nothing about this sin. I understand the GLBT community being angry. No one wants their sin singled out. God views all sin equally. However, those who divorce or gossip or (fill in the space with your pet sin) don't seek public acceptance for their sin. Members of the GLBT community not only want public acceptance for their sin - they want special protection. No.
Kim Huffman
|
August 02, 2012
I take offense to that..I eat shellfish and pork, which are abominations according to Leviticus too, and I demand public acceptance of my sins. Meet me at the alter of BBQ and Fried Shrimp, and we will go down to the river for a baptismal.

So mjtailorsmom, do you ask for forgiveness when you eat pork or food from the sea without scales?
TerrenceD
|
August 02, 2012
Two people loving each other and wanting to have a family, maybe even adopt a kid no one wants and give him a loving home. What a crime against humanity! So refreshing that people like you are spearheading efforts to try and to put a stop to that. The world needs more people like this. Bravo!
anonymous
|
August 02, 2012
You know that divorce is legal, right?
TerrenceD
|
August 02, 2012
Pretty sure gossip is also a billion dollar industry. Guess I shouldn't sneak a peak at that Star Magazine while in line at Publix. Wait, that could be considered stealing too. Oh the humanity!
Pam J
|
August 01, 2012
I don't know why this has to be divided between parties. I have been a life-long Democrat and I don't believe in same-sex marriage. Not all Democrats are the same and not all Republicans are the same. You don't have to walk down a straight line with either party. And thank goodness for that because we would all be very boring.
VFP42
|
August 01, 2012
Antoine Dodson says he supports Chick-fil-a. He got aunties and uncles that don't approve of gay marriage but he still love them. And that is an excellent point Antoine make. You don't stop loving somebody even if they can be kind of ugly sometime.
And......
|
August 01, 2012
How many female franchise owners are there?

How many non-white franchise owners are there?

How many franchise owners are there NOT affiliated with a church?

This is the tip of the iceburg folks. The Cathy's have been allowed to be politely discriminatory for years. Check it out....they are not singling out the gays.
Matthewmanely
|
August 01, 2012
I'm definitely on the far left of the aisle, but I don't think this public boycott of chickfila will accomplish anything. Dan Cathy, who I disagree with but vehemently respect, will hopefully not change his opinion due to public pressure. The chickfila company has always upheld a constant set of standards, and with politicians on both sides of the aisle constantly flip flopping to pander to lobbyists, it's good to see some consistency. Everyone seems to also be overlooking Chickfila's support for welfare programs, which I find to be another testament to chickfila remaining true to themselves regardless of mainstream politics. For every sandwich we scream about not buying, the republicans will gladly buy to offset it. Liberals are harming their own cause. I personally have an addiction to Chickfila sauce, so while I may not eat their food as often, the withdrawals are too bad to resist it all of the time.
to all this I say
|
August 01, 2012
let's be honest, the real reason that liberals can't see their own dishonesty and double standards is because....wait for it...most of them are not intelligent. Just being honest here!
Pam J
|
August 01, 2012
You are not being honest - you are being narrow-minded.
Kim Huffman
|
August 02, 2012
I guess you forgot your "freedom fries" boycott of fast food places serving "French fries"... conservatives are the blind ones, here, telling half truths and filling in the blanks with Rush Limbaugh cheese
idontloveit
|
August 01, 2012
I am so sick of hearing about this. Eat there. Don't eat there. But let's not act like this is changing anything. This is FREE publicity for Chick-fil-A. And by the way, I really want a Number 1 with a side of BBQ sauce and sweet tea.

JRC1984
|
August 01, 2012
Just went to Chick-Fil-A for lunch today and the line of cars was wrapped around the building and there were Police directing traffic. It was very heart warming to see Americans who really believe in FREE SPEECH showing support for a great American brand.
anonymous
|
August 02, 2012
Do you think that "free speech" means "no one ever gets to disagree with what I say"?
btn
|
August 01, 2012
I think it is interesting that a business owner is giving money for the specific purpose of preventing people from getting married due to their sexual preference, yet somehow you make him the victim.

I have a great deal of respect for Chick-Fil-A and the way they run their business, but this was a self inflicted wound to their business they did not need to take. As the column notes, anyone familiar with the company knows where they stand on these issues. I would suspect that the elder Cathy would not have made this same comment.

The behavior of several US mayors to this has been absurd, banning restaurants based on their political views is a childish idea.

I would be interested in knowing how exactly Obama has bludgeoned Catholics, to be honest it has been Obama that has been the target of attacks by Catholics due to the fact that some are no longer allowed to impose their religious views on their employees via their health care options.

Love CFA
|
August 01, 2012
Just enjoyed eating my chicken sandwich from Chic-Fil-A while reading these comments against a wonderful company. Today, Aug. 1 which is Chic-Fil-A Appreciation Day, was the most crowded I have ever seen any Chic-Fil-A business. I felt like I might have been at the Varsity during a Ga.Tech v. UGA game - absolutely packed! I guess there are more that support the traditional and accepted form of marriage than those who wish to change it.
anonymous
|
August 02, 2012
I would bet that more people didn't eat there yesterday than did.
What the!?
|
August 01, 2012
I had a statement-on-family-values-masquerading-as-a-sincere-gesture-of-kindness breakfast biscuit today.

Someone that's never bought breakfast before brought in a whole bag of 'em for us today.

anonymous
|
August 01, 2012
You do know Mayor Rahm Emanuel is Jewish, right?
Ryan Bays
|
August 01, 2012
Give me a break. No one is saying that Dan Cathy does not have the right to be a bigot. No one is saying that Chick-fil-A does not have the right to donate money to homophobic organizations. People are attacking Chick-fil-A's homophobia, not their owners’ right to express it
Think again.....
|
August 01, 2012
Chick-Fil-A is not homophobic. It is an inanimate corporation entirely owned by Mr. Cathy. Mr. Cathy is homophobic. I would even guess he has gay people working for him right now who are less than happy about his recent comments.
Ryan Bays
|
August 01, 2012
The Chick-fil-A company donates profits to anti-gay organizations, which means it executes homophobic policies as a matter of doing business. My intention was not to anthropomorphize the company in the sense you imply.
Think Again
|
August 01, 2012
I get that, but you are missing the point, Mr. Cathy drives that, NOT some board of directors or shareholders. Just do not broad brush the company, and those who derive a livliehood from it as being homophobic.
Ryan Bays
|
August 01, 2012
I'm sure there are many employees of Chick-fil-A who are incredibly torn by this. On the one hand, they collect a paycheck from a proudly anti-gay organization while personally they may abhor those policies or may even be gay themselves. That said, they have a choice to make that you surely can’t gloss over. They are cogs in the wheel of an organization the leaders of which are loud and proud about their bigotry.
mjtailorsmom
|
August 01, 2012
Mr. Cathy is not homophobic. He is not afraid of homosexuals nor is he a bigot. Anytime people start calling others who disagree with them names means they have no logical argument to persuade them otherwise. I love Chick-fil-A and wish the GLBT community would treat me as badly as CFA treats them.
TerrenceD
|
August 02, 2012
"I love Chick-fil-A and wish the GLBT community would treat me as badly as CFA treats them."

I don't think the gay community would ever donate more than $5 million to an organization that tried to take away your rights and criminalize your lifestyle like CFA does to them. That's the difference here that you obviously are not understanding.

And calling Cathy a bigot is not name calling, it's what he is. Feel free to look the word up in the dictionary.
Just sayin'
|
August 01, 2012
To everyone involved...read beyond Mr. Cathy's remarks about gays. He also was able to bash divorced people in the same statement of defense.

"We're all married to our first wives."

I am a fairly conservative Christian, but the first thing I learned as a child was that God loves, God forgives and ONLY God judges. While I agree Mr. Cathy has a right to do whatever he likes with his money, I think when he does it under the umbrella of his business he invites trouble. He is definitely within his rights to have an agenda, just as I am within my rights to no longer do business with him.
East Cobb
|
August 01, 2012
Great, that leaves more for the rest of us!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides