T-SPLOST will stimulate local economy
July 27, 2012 12:00 AM | 1374 views | 13 13 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

Recently I have been reading opinions about the TSPLOST vote coming up on Tuesday. One common statement I see over and over again is usually “I will vote no because these projects will not affect me.“ To these people I would like to say that these projects will in fact affect you because they will stimulate our local economy.

The GDOT employs tens of thousands of men and woman here in Georgia by letting, then awarding projects all over the state to contractors. This is more far-reaching than most people realize. Sub-contractors, fabricators, manufacturers, suppliers, lumber mills, steel mills, truck drivers, quarries, just to name a few, will be directly impacted if TSPLOST is not passed. Many smaller contractors have already gone out of business and countless others have lost their jobs because GDOT simply does not have the funds to let projects.

Keeping an updated and safe infrastructure is one of the main jobs of government. This is not something the private sector can do. Unfortunately a contractor cannot just decide on his own to build a road or repair a bridge. For that we need government and we need to use our taxes to pay for it.

I looked at the list of proposed projects and there are some good and well-needed ones listed. There are also a few that may not be so critical, to me at least.

Here’s a fact that I can’t back up but no one reading this will be able to deny. $8 billion dollars to do road projects in the state of Georgia is only a small fraction of the money needed to do all of the work that needs to be done. Every major interchange around 285 (and most small ones) needs to be reworked and updated.

An outer perimeter needs to be looked at again. A vast majority of bridges need to be widened (and some just torn down and replaced). I-75, I-85, 675, 575 I-20, 285 and Ga. 400 all need to be widened to accept additional lanes. A new highway that runs north and south that doesn’t bottleneck in downtown Atlanta would be nice. How about a highway that will take you from Cherokee/north Cobb to Gwinnett without having to get on 285?

These are just some ideas for the metro area. What about the rest of the state? How many thousands of miles of roads here locally need to be repaved or widened? How many thousands of secondary intersections need to be updated and turn lanes added? Again, I’m just talking about the metro area. Again, what about the rest of the state? Would $100 billion be enough? $200 billion maybe? Do those numbers sound ridiculous? I don’t think they do. I’m sorry, but $8 billion is just not enough to implement improvements that will affect every one.

This tax will put a lot of people back to work. If you are voting no because “It doesn’t affect you,” how about voting yes because it will affect many others?

Tony Visockis

Marietta
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ErinRogers
|
July 28, 2012
People have gotten so complacent with the idea of traffic that they just take it as a way of life. The projects presented in the T-SPLOST will not only go towards improving our current transportation infrastructure but it will also ensure that we have more mobility options as well. With the construction of so many needed projects in Atlanta it is inevitable that it will create more jobs. $8.5 billion will be raised! There has to be someone employed to build/improve the transportation infrastructure that will be put into place.
Unglaublich
|
July 29, 2012
No, Erin. You have it all wrong. The $8.5 billion you speak of will simply be sucked out of our pockets and put into government's pockets for them to distribute the way they like...along with about a 40% waste factor.

This is nothing more than wealth re-distribution to the good old boys network.

This is NOT "new" money.

Please understand this. Quickly.
SG68
|
July 30, 2012
@ ErinRogers

This is simply another version of the Obama income redistribution scam.

But in this case it is not an effort to take from the haves and redistribute to the supposed have nots.

It is actually the other way around.

Taking from the Have Nots and then redistributing it the Haves.

and to further address your point about job creation

The job creation figures that have been claimed as fact are not correct. Permanent, quality jobs will not be created and those that are will be few and far between.

It is a fabrication meant to play off of the current dirth of job opportunities for the sole purpose of generating votes.

BrittanyUnderwwod82
|
July 28, 2012
The T-SPLOST is a regional solution to our traffic concerns. By implementing road improvement projects throughout the 10 county Metro Atlanta region we can begin to make the roads safer and ease the traffic that is on them. By investing in light rail transit throughout the city as well it will also be providing mobility options to get around the city which in turn will assist in alleviating congestion as well.
Gregg Averett
|
July 27, 2012
Mr. Visockis would have a point on the merits if TSPLOST were just about the road/highway improvements he enumerates. It is not a true transportation bill, however. It is a hodge podge of political ideas of the day, the main one being mass transit.

We pride ourselves at calling Atlanta the "City in the Trees". It is a lifestyle that entails a sprawling Metroplex without the concentration of hi-rise living among office centers that typifies cities with successful mass transportation systems. A widely dispersed population means a significant drive by auto is required to make any portion of the commute by train. It's just not worth the time and trouble to make the switch. And, it's just not worth the monumental expense for an insufficient ridership.

Other "transportation" initiatives include sidewalks, bike paths, and the beltway park connector that are lifestyle improvements that are nice, but are they affordable? And, how will they help congestion?

Give us a clean bill to get our cars moving more efficiently. That is the need we should focus on and let the stimulus flow from that.
anonymous
|
July 27, 2012
Here is how I define a job created. One that does not use my tax dollars to pay their salary.
anonymous
|
July 28, 2012
Exactly!

Tony Visockis thinks YOU need to work harder so that YOU can hire your neighbor to build a road that really is not needed.

I makes me cringe to realize there are so many deeply stupid idiots living so close to me.
west cobber
|
July 28, 2012
Here's how I define a job created, one that puts people back to work, whether tax dollars are used or not. In your world, we would not have new police officers, fire fighters, military they are all paid with "our" tax dollars. Whether you are for or against TSPLOST, comments like yours are why we as a country cannot accomplish anything. Realize that if this boondoggle passes, you will pay the $.01 tax wherever you are in the metro area. But please stop making stupid comments like yours
@anonymous
|
July 30, 2012
Using your logic we would have to get rid of the military and all of our emergency services.

In my opinion, There are only three things our tax money should be spent on. National defense, Emergency services and our infrastructure.

To say that these road projects are not needed is a blatant attempt to mislead people who may not be so informed.

I don't think putting people back to work is a bad thing and the only ones who can pay for our infrastructure is us ...

As far as i am concerned you lost any credibility when you resorted in childish name calling and didn't even have the courage to identify yourself. You sir are a coward.
guess what
|
July 27, 2012
TSPLOST is supposedly about improving transportation, which it will not, it was not meant to be the latest attempt at a jobs/stimulus package.
Wrong Medicine !
|
July 27, 2012
The TSPLOST project list wastes tax resources that could help fix the worthwhile needs you describe ! I wastes a huge amount of money that does not fix traffic congestion.

Your letter makes the opposition point. How can we blow $700 million, 2/3 of all Cobb's project money, on one project in Fulton County that will not address the problems you so accurately describe?

Please, rethink the ACTUAL list being proposed, and vote NO so we can develop Plan B.
Last GA Democrat
|
July 27, 2012
The state, by way of the Georgia Department of Transportation, tried to widen I-75 to as many as 18-25 lanes between I-285 and I-575 back in 2005, but had to quickly back off of the proposal due to very negative feedback from the public and objections by the Cobb County government who did not want to lose very valuable tax revenues from the industrial and commercial properties that closely line I-75 that would condemned if the road were widened.

The state also has twice tried to build a bypass to the the Downtown Connector, both through and under historic East Atlanta with a proposal to run a tolled connector between GA 400 and I-675 through tunnels under the Eastside of the city.

The original freeway proposed to run through East Atlanta was stopped by neighborhood residents who lived in and near the path of the proposed road in what is considered to be one of the most famous and legendary freeway revolts of all time back in the 1970's while the proposal to tunnel I-675 under the city was quickly abandoned due to much very-negative public feedback in 2007.

Heck, it is just the very modest amounts of proposed road construction that is in the project list that has the T-SPLOST on the ropes and on the verge of defeat as many Metro Atlantans, both inside and outside I-285, object to additional road construction on the grounds that they fear that more road construction will only bring more overdevelopment which will only bring even more. traffic.

It is Metro Atlanta's strange and unique aversion to roadbuilding that the reason why GDOT has repeatedly stated that they don't plan to add any new untolled lanes to the freeway system.

The irony is that the defeat of the T-SPLOST, which many of its critics claim funds too much transit, that will likely strike a fatal blow to any major roadbuilding efforts in Metro Atlanta in the future.
proudVet
|
July 28, 2012
I think the aversion to roads is more about continuing to just add to the arterial system we have instead of adding alternative routes. With the arterial road system if you have an accident you shut the whole thing down. If they would look for the opportunity to create a grid network we might get some traffic relief
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides