Penn State’s conspiracy of silence
July 25, 2012 12:37 AM | 1475 views | 4 4 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Before dawn on Sunday, workers showed up at Penn State’s Beaver Stadium, put up a chain-link fence to keep spectators at bay and draped the fence in a blue tarp to block TV cameras. They then proceeded to jackhammer from its base the 7-foot tall, 900-pound statue of a man whose name is synonymous with Penn State.

All that could be seen of Joe Paterno — as his bronze likeness was hauled off to what was, apparently without irony, described as a secure, undisclosed location — was a finger pointed skyward in the universal “we’re No. 1 gesture.” In this case, it had become an ironic gesture of humiliation.

In an appropriate twist of fate, the university was reaping what it had hoped to avoid in covering up allegations of sexual abuse of young boys by a former coach: negative publicity for the university and its football program. Now, until other scandals come along — and they will in big-time, big-dollar college football — the school is getting nothing but negative publicity.

Shame and embarrassment were not among the sanctions the NCAA imposed on Penn State, but they may be the most effective means of seeing that a similar situation never recurs there and of giving pause to others inclined to cover up crimes for the good of a football program and a university’s image.

The NCAA sanction actually had little or nothing to do with the crimes that prompted them. The football program is crippled for four years by a loss of 20 athletic scholarships each year, by a ban on post-season play, and by making it easier for players to transfer (and other schools to raid Penn State’s roster).

The NCAA imposed a $60 million fine. Also Monday, the Big Ten Conference announced Penn State would forfeit its share of proceeds over the next four years, estimated at $13 million. Both amounts will go toward child-protection programs.

In truth, this was not a matter for an athletic association but for law enforcement. It would have been, had Paterno and university officials not chosen to keep quiet for almost 13 years about allegations that a retired Penn State coach, Jerry Sandusky, was using university facilities and his perks as an ex-coach to sexually abuse young boys. Sandusky was found guilty of 45 counts of abusing young boys and is awaiting sentencing.

In an investigation belatedly commissioned by the university, emails turned up showing that Paterno and the administrators he technically reported to were more concerned with the football program’s reputation than the abused youngsters’ welfare. Moreover, Paterno, then the wins leader in major college football, had become such an institution that the Penn State hierarchy was unwilling, even afraid, to cross him.

As officials in a top-flight academic institution, they surely knew of Edmund Burke’s oft-cited observation, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” And that is what they did. Nothing.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
kathy s.
|
July 25, 2012
The buck stops with the board and law enforcement. The fact that Sandusky was investigated by law enforcement and state agencies 13 years ago has been ignored. Why was he not prosecuted then? This was and has never been a football issue.

@kathy
|
July 25, 2012
This is the first time I've heard of any such prior law enforcement investigation. If correct, it is truly a disgusting effort on the part of local law enforcement and prosecutor's office, particularly since there was an eye witness to an assault on a child in the Penn State althetic facility showers who reported the event directly to Paterno one year earlier. Why did it take a year to conduct the investigation? Names need to be identified, and heads should roll for such neglegence. Please cite the article date and name of the source printing the details of the investigation to which you refer. I have to see this for myself. As to a football issue, I could not disagree more. This was a completely out-of-control operation. They allowed child assaults to continue for 14 years. They could have stoppedit but didn't. They put football ahead of the most vile of child assaults, all for the sake of money, recruiting, and reputation. Truly, truly pathetic and sickening, IMHO.

G. Flubber III
Kim Huffman
|
July 25, 2012
Its all a football issue, and the demagoguery surrounding the coach, the alumni support, recruiting, TV dollars, etc.

This scenario could find itself in Georgia, Stanford, Kentucky, or any other high profile University owned by the athletics department and the millions made off of them.

Its the untouchables...much like molesting priests in the Catholic church that get bounced around to different dioceses, with the tacit agreement of the Vatican. All of it disgusting.
why not
|
July 26, 2012
That's the problem, the only thing that really mattered, to anyone, was "football".
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides