Ott not happy with condo rent proposal
by Geoff Folsom
July 11, 2012 01:01 AM | 2984 views | 11 11 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print

MARIETTA — One Cobb County commissioner expressed displeasure with a proposed code amendment that would allow owners of planned condominiums to rent more of their units instead of putting them up for sale.

After a public hearing during Tuesday’s Board of Commissioners meeting, southeast Cobb Commissioner Bob Ott said he doesn’t see a need for up to 25 percent of condo owners in a complex to be able to put their properties up for rental.

“We need to leave it at the 10 percent,” Ott said. “And then on a case by case basis, if we decide we want to go higher, then we can do that instead of automatically going to a higher number.”

Ott said it is important for the county to make clear which properties are for-rent apartments and which are for-sale condominiums. During the economic downturn, more developers have sought to be allowed to build condominiums with rental units because of falling demand.

“That’s not necessarily fair to the people who have purchased there, when all of a sudden the people who are living there don’t really have ownership in the property,” Ott said.

During the public hearing, the first of two that must be held before commissioners can approve code amendments, James Touchton, a lobbyist with the Duluth-based Council for Quality Growth, said the Board of Commissioners should change the wording in the amendment to use the Federal National Mortgage association, or Fannie Mae’s, maximum number for rentals in condominium projects. While the rate is currently 25 percent, the same as Cobb has proposed, that can go up or down depending on market conditions.

“That way it reflects how the economy is at a given time,” Touchton said.

Ott said that once a developer starts renting units, it is difficult to change it back to condominiums.

“I think once you start mixing and matching, you run into some issues,” he said.

The county put a moratorium on using the urban condominium zoning designation in March. The moratorium is scheduled to expire July 24, the date of the next Board of Commissioners meeting. Community Development Director Rob Hosack said the moratorium was put in place because a number of developers requested that units in condominium complexes be allowed to go up for lease.

“There was some concern that it was almost a way to make them apartments instead of condominiums,” Hosack said.

Hosack said about 10 complexes have sought the ability to lease units in condominiums complexes.

The concerns over the urban condominium designation initially came from the Cobb County Civic Coalition, an organization of community-based groups.

A second public hearing is scheduled for the Board of Commissioners’ July 24 meeting. At that time, commissioners would likely set a vote for their following meeting on Aug. 14, though they could make changes to the amendments and determine if further hearings are needed, county spokesman Robert Quigley said.

Ott was the only commissioner to vote against reorganizing the purchasing and property management divisions, which had been a recommendation of the Citizen Oversight Committee, which met last year to find ways to make county government more efficient.

The changes would allow the county to fill its vacant purchasing director position and update its organizational structure to have three full-time property management division managers to handle 2011 SPLOST projects, said Virgil Moon, support services agency director.

While officials said the changes would end up being “budget-neutral,” Ott said he wasn’t so sure.

“I’m not convinced that the costing is necessarily neutral,” Ott said. “I’m also not convinced that it’s needed. Overall, I just have concerns. It’s not like we’ve identified something in property management or purchasing that has a problem. I feel like we’re creating two positions, and I’m not sure it’s the right way to go.”

Commissioners followed the Citizen Oversight Committee’s recommendations to create audit and compensation committees in a 5-0 vote. While County Manager David Hankerson and his staff recommended against following the committee’s advice, commissioners decided last month to go ahead and create the committees.

The audit committee will be charged with evaluating and reviewing the county’s financial information, systems of internal controls and the audit process, according to an agenda item written by Chairman Tim Lee. The compensation committee will review pay and benefits for the county’s more than 4,000 employees.

Each committee will include five members: the chairman, a district commissioner, another county elected official and two residents with expertise in the area, Lee said. Commissioners are expected to appoint members, who won’t be paid, at an upcoming meeting.

In other actions, commissioners:

  • Unanimously approved a contract with Blount Construction Company Inc. for drainage system and shoulder repairs on Laramie Drive for $107,698. The Marietta company’s bid on the 2011 SPLOST-funded project was lower than the $107,982 bid by Chatfield Contracting Inc. of Kennesaw and the $152,689 bid by D&H Construction Company Inc. of Atlanta.

     
  • Unanimously approved a $51,159 contract with Janson Industries of Canton, Ohio, for 2011 SPLOST-funded equipment repair and replacement of the backstage fly system at the Jennie T. Anderson Theatre at the Cobb County Civic Center. The bid beat out Mainstage Theatrical Supply Inc. of Milwaukee, which bid $53,965, and Georgia Stage of Duluth, which bid $61,241.

     
  • Unanimously approved a $154,746 2011 SPLOST-funded contract with Johnson Landscapes Inc. of Cumming to replace cross-tie retaining walls at Lions Park and Wallace Park in Mableton. Griffco Design/Build Inc. of Kennesaw was second at $166,257, while W.E. Contracting Company Inc. of Acworth was third at $281,353.

Read more: The Marietta Daily Journal - Ott not happy with condo rent proposal

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FROM TEXAS
|
July 12, 2012
Builders wanted to build as many condos’ as they wanted too. Now they are all over the metro area turning these into section eight housing running ads in the northeast to bring the lower income section eight to a neighborhood near you. Bob go ahead and get Timmy to hire more police and buy more cars you need them. Just go to Kennesaw and ask people over there what has happened over there and insurance rates have been adjust for the risk of living in those area’s .
East Cobb Not
|
July 12, 2012
East Cobb: Easy access to interstates -- how many minutes to the city once you actually get on an interstate; 90 minutes to get there. Way, way, way over populated. I looked at a condo there and did a test drive to get downtown at 8:30 a.m. (which is late). It took me 60 minutes to get to the interstate, 15 more minutes to get past midtown, then it was a scoot of 15 more minutes.
Once Again
|
July 11, 2012
Ott wasn't the oversight committee your idea? Now you do not want to implement their recommendation to hire even though it would not affect the budget? Why is it you always vote against the very things you asked for? The TSPLOST is another example, why do you keep wanting to spend the money in your district when you are againist it passing? Make up your mind you cannot have it both ways.
TIC
|
July 11, 2012
Couldn't you just leave it up to the current owners in a condo complex to decide whether they want up to 25% of the units to be elkigible for rental?

Just put a requirement in the ordinance that gives them (the existing resident condo owners) the option, then let them decide what's best for their community.

Why should Cobb County decide what is best for them?
E.E.
|
July 22, 2012
As a condo resident, I could not put this better. Well said TIC.

Why should the county decide what is best for them? Especially if the foreclosures are bringing down the property values for everyone who lives there. If a revised, appropriate rental percentage would eliminate the plummeting property values, then homeowners should certainly have the opportunity to amend the previous rule.
Stuck with a condo
|
July 11, 2012
What we need is help with the condo market in East Cobb. Mr. Ott, how to you get rid of a condo in your district that will not sell, and will not rent?!? Foreclosure...
oh well....
|
July 11, 2012
Too bad for condo owners,..so sad.

There's nothing out here protecting homeowners from all the homes turning rental either.

The cities w/ quality leadership are faring much better.

The 3 cities that made Forbes top 25 best cities to live list are in North Fulton,..Alpharetta, Roswell & Sandy Springs.

Cobb has turned into a backwards, trashy dump!

Get out while you can!

The Truth
|
July 11, 2012
Once again we have a commissioner, the same commissioner who consistantly does this, comes out after the fact with his late comments. The man doesn't have an original thought at all. He has to wait until after a meeting before he grabs a reporter and complains. Or does he just wave his arms and Geoff and Jon come a running?

What about the other news from the commission meeting? Was this the only item that was newsworthy? Absolutely not.
therealtruth@
|
July 11, 2012
Maybe you should watch a meeting instead of just blogging. You might learn something. I believe the commissioner you refer to made his comments during the meeting. Watch and learn.
Tex G
|
July 11, 2012
Who in 2012 American does not know that condos are apartments waiting to happen?

Condos have been and will continue to be a bad real estate investment. Just another social engineering plan to pack everyone into sardine cans like the north east US.

Let them rent or rot. Who didn't know this when they bought them? Plus clamping down on free enterprise is just another commie encroachment.
Condo Dweller
|
July 11, 2012
Now wait just a minute Tex G. There are people who choose to live in condos. Those who have no desire to take care of a yard, want to live below their means, have a smaller place to take care of, etc., etc. Condos only turn into apartments when it's allowed to happen. Commie encroachment my condo dwelling butt.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides