Occupy movement protecting Cobb home
by Geoff Folsom
July 03, 2012 01:00 AM | 6219 views | 25 25 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
NORTHEAST COBB — The Occupy movement has come to a wooded neighborhood near Kell High School.

Protestors with Occupy Our Homes ATL conducted a press conference Monday at the foreclosed home where Steve Boudreaux and two housemates live, promising to help keep an eye on the house in case anyone tries to repossess it.

The home occupation was the first one of its kind in Cobb, but Occupy organizer Tim Franzen said it won’t be the last.

“What we’re seeing in Cobb County is that these neighborhoods are just starting to get where some of the harder hit areas of Atlanta are,” Franzen said. “Steve is the first to really step up, and we’re looking for others to do the same thing.”

Boudreaux, 56, said he bought the house on Rubes Landing five years ago and fell behind his payments with Wells Fargo Bank last year when he lost his job and his girlfriend, whom he shared house payments with, moved out.

Boudreaux said the bank began foreclosure proceedings when he fell 90 days behind in his payments. Now working at a job in building restoration, Boudreaux said he’d worked out an emergency loan modification with Wells Fargo, but that fell through when tax transcripts from the IRS arrived late, and the bank went ahead with trying to sell the house at the June 5 foreclosure sale. But Boudreaux called Franzen a day earlier, and Occupy protesters showed up on the Courthouse steps in Marietta with signs reading “1525 Rubes Landing Comes with Protesters.”

No one bought the house that day, but Boudreaux said he still worries that he will be forced out. So Occupy protesters will help make sure somebody is on site at all times in case someone tries to repossess it while he is away.

Boudreaux has even placed a symbolic tent inside the picket fence around his front yard, though he plans to let anyone staying there sleep inside the house.

“What I want is simple,” Boudreaux said. “I want Wells Fargo to approve my loan modification so I can stay in my home. I’m open to negotiating or communicating on almost any facet of it.”

But Wells Fargo southeast spokesman Jay Lawrence said it’s not that simple. He said the home is actually owned by a mortgage financing company, which he declined to identify. While the bank originated and wrote the loan for the house and then serviced it, Wells Fargo stopped being involved when it went to foreclosure.

“At this point we have nothing to do with the property,” he said. “We worked for more than two years to help Mr. Boudreaux avoid foreclosure, and unfortunately, we were not successful.”

Lawrence said Wells Fargo has successfully worked with 35,000 homeowners in the Atlanta area to help avoid foreclosure.

Boudreaux said he owes between $7,000 and $8,000 on his house. But he said there are at least 10 other homes in the Jamerson Forest neighborhood to go through foreclosure.

“I love this area, I love this neighborhood,” he said. “My neighborhood is being decimated. If something doesn’t happen, it may be the next to fall.”

Neighbor Diana House, 66, said she lives with her daughter and is working three part-time jobs to get by.

“We just want to stay in our homes,” she said.

Franzen said Occupy’s goal is to help homeowners facing foreclosure stay in their houses. Occupy is now working with Rich Pellegrino of the Cobb United for Change Coalition, who said his organization plans to have a workshop to help homeowners learn how to stand up to the banks.

“The tipping point will come when homeowners, inspired by other homeowners, will open the toolkit and do it on their own,” Franzen said. “Occupy is not an owned brand or a trademark. It’s everyone’s and anyone’s.”
Comments
(25)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Pam J
|
July 07, 2012
While I sympathize with this guy, I think he needs to step back and realize that he probably can't afford the house. If it was bought with two peoples salaries and now there's only one, I'm sure that puts a burden on him. I made my last house payment in June of last year. I bought my house in 1998 and I hated to let it go, but I didn't have a job and couldn't survive on unemployment. My mortgage company (GMAC Mortgage) tried very hard to work with me (I was going to rent it), but nothing worked, so it was foreclosed on and put up for "auction" back in February. My brother lost his job last May. He made his last house payment in June. He has Suntrust as his mortgage company. He filed for a loan modification (had to send the papers in four times) and did not have to make a payment during that time. He finally got a letter last month stating that he was not approved for the modification (he is working now), but he was approved for the Making Home Affordable program. So he gets to keep his house. I honestly believe that banks and mortgage companies don't really want to foreclose. I think this guy needs to just leave. If you look his house up on the Cobb County assessor's web site, I think it shows that he paid $130,000 for the house. And he's been in it for five years. And probably close to 7 or 8 months of no payments. My advice? Kick Mr. Pelligrino and his cronies out and move.
anonymous
|
July 05, 2012
While these Occupy people are "guarding" houses, who is working to pay their own house payments? And by "guarding," what does that mean anyway? The Occupy people have rights over legal authorities to stop them from taking legal possession of a house? Please....buy a house you can afford, admit it if you can't and get on with your life without that house you cannot pay for. All you are doing is lowering the value of the houses surrounding yours.
Just Wait
|
July 04, 2012
It is time for the Occupy Movement to realize that their time in the sun has passed. They have been exposed as a group of non-productive publicity hounds that have cost the tax payers untold dollars in policing and cleanup fees and achieved nothing.
NtheNo
|
July 03, 2012
Occupy....LOL
Around In West Cobb
|
July 03, 2012
I've read this story, wouldn't it be best for the occupy crowd to help raise the $7,000 he owes and catch up on the mortgage?
West Cobb Resident
|
July 04, 2012
Ha! That's a really good idea! Problem is, none of them would have close to $7,000. If they had it, they wouldn't be in the "occupy" movement. It's actually an insult to movements everywhere to call "occupy" a "movement."
Ken Lamb
|
July 03, 2012
He said that he was $7-8 thousand behind on his mortgage and they started proceedings after 90 days. Something does not sound quite kosher here. Maybe the Obama truth is coming out.
MAY-RETA SURVIVOR
|
July 03, 2012
Mr. Bourdreaux, You truly do not, repeat do not, do yourself a favor by alligning yourself to any "occupy" movement or it's followers.

You started out oin the right track, by trying to work throught the legal system. I strongly believe that by working with the banks, instead of against them, will prove to be successful.

My advice to you is to tell those "occupiers" to get lost as their particular brand of "question authority" tactics will surely result in them loss of your personal credibility especially with anyone you go to for financial help. They are using you. In short; tell those "occupiers" to go take a hike!

I wish you good luck and hope that you will take my advice.
Shawn_in_ATL
|
July 03, 2012
I agree with all of the comments posted so far.
Tsk Tsk...
|
July 03, 2012
This is a prime example of a person over-extending themselves beyond their financial reach and are now having to deal with the unfortunate consequences. Its precisely this type of behavior that set off the mortgage crisis and sent our economy into a tailspin.

Two years to right the ship and he still could not get things in order? That's pathetic and sad. Don't buy things you cannot afford!
Been there
|
July 04, 2012
Obviously you have never been in the position of the home owner. Do not say he over-extended himself. Do you realize that unemployment in this state pays a maximum of $300.00 per week? People in that position have to decide between putting food on the table or paying the mortgage. The mortgage companies have done nothing to help keep people in their homes.

Unfortunately this is what happened to many of us. In the last 3 years we have lost everything that we built up in the past 30 years. We were not over extended. We were a middle class family raising a family and paying our bills. When unemployment and under employment caused us to loose everything....our savings, retirement and finally our home.

We are not pathetic or sad....we are starting over!
imeanwhatever
|
July 03, 2012
i think the part about Diana says it all. she works THREE jobs to get by. Diana has decided that she is going to take responsibility and do what it takes to pay her bills. on the other hand, the occuturd works one job and complains that the bank, who he owes money to, wants to collect.
chadders
|
July 03, 2012
It should be noted that Diana lost her home despite having three jobs. I'd add that Diana is standing in solidarity with Steve.

I think folks don't realize just how bad things are right now. The housing crisis today is worse them it was during the great depression in Georgia. The tipping point during that era was when communities started moving their neighbors back into homes after bank evictions. It was what our country needed then, it's what we need now.
JDTBQ
|
July 03, 2012
@Chadders, Handouts tide people over, JOBS allow people to create their own futures. We need a lot more vision and leadership in Washington.
Knowledgeable rider
|
July 03, 2012
It's good to see the news media still enjoys covering a good circus with these Occupy nuts serving as clowns. Now pass out the peanuts and Cracker Jacks.
andnow
|
July 03, 2012
I think it is very telling that the "occupy" group is teaming up with Rich Pellegrino. What a pair.
So Judgemental
|
July 03, 2012
My guess is that you three commenters call yourselves Christians and sit in judgement anyway. The villain here is not the homeowner. The villain is the bank that refuses to work with a homeowner.

Every time a house is foreclosed on it becomes a blight on the neighborhood. Yes, some investors are snapping up bargains at pennies on the dollar and renting them out, but many houses are languishing and falling down around their foundations. Why would a bank choose to take a house and get pennies on the dollar when by doing something a small as lowering the interest rate they could save the homeowner hundreds of dollars a month and STILL make hundreds of thousands on the loan over its 30-year life?

Because banks don't care. If you are not a hedge fund manager or a corporation, they don't care. They will write off these losses and watch neighborhoods crumble into dust. Banks love the Occupy movement because it gives people another target ("occupy hobos and deadbeats") instead of allowing citizens to focus on the true issue: banks and their criminal and unethical practices.
Too Quick to Judge
|
July 03, 2012
So Judgemental, I think you are correct in many cases. But this article also helped me understand about the big bank procedure-Wells Fargo sold the foreclosure of this house to another mortgage company. I have not understood how some people could live in their home for over a year while making no payments or reduced payments, while other people fall behind for only a few months and they are foreclosed upon in a shorter time. Having unoccupied homes in a neighborhood does no good and even getting renters is not always a big help either. The renters usually don't care that much aobut the home or their neighbors.

Better solutions to these situations are desperately needed. Just as help for our economy is badly needed.
Tsk Tsk...
|
July 03, 2012
Refuses to work with the homeowner?

If you'll recall in the article, the bank representative stated that they "worked for more than two years to help Mr. Boudreaux avoid foreclosure." I work for a bank, in commercial credit analysis, and fully understand the process that is taking place here. Banks want to avoid foreclosure because it means they lose money.

Lowering the interest rate will help out in the short run for Boudreaux, but if he can't make the payments and catch up on his debt it's a lost cause. I doubt this guy has much in the home, otherwise he wouldn't be in foreclosure. So, other than having to pick up and move (and lose a couple thousand dollars for making a stupid mistake) he'll be better off in the long run. If he wanted to save himself, he would have short-sold his home to avoid this outcome.

Veteran Observer
|
July 03, 2012
The "occupy" hobos and deadbeats are a waste of everyone's time and news space! It must be a very slow day in the newsroom to publicize these parasites that represent no one or anything worthwhile! I would hope the MDJ could find something of interest to the 99.9% of the citizens who are working hard to live up to their obligation and responsibilities! I would also hope that these immature "occupy" folks can get some mental and occupational therapy so that they can take their place as useful citizens in the community!
West Cobb Resident
|
July 03, 2012
Franzen needs to get a real job. All these occupiers really occupy is a few inches in the newspaper, and only that, occasionally.
Tough Jobber
|
July 03, 2012
Since Franzen is an ex-con, him getting a job might be difficult, particularly when his only accomplishment in life has been to illegally occupy other peoples' property.
nokiddin
|
July 03, 2012
No sympathy here!

You shacked up with a woman who you did not commit to and marry, then depended on her to help make the mortgage, then she left (imagine that, with no marital incentive to stay, why not).

You are the result of your own screwed up choices. Why should ANYONE else be burdened with your misguided and childish mistakes. You made the (now partnerless bed) and now you have to sleep in it. Your problem, Dude!
Agree nokiddin
|
July 03, 2012
A lot of responsibility comes with home ownership. It's a process of maturity. Our government had no business shortening that process, simply because "it leveled the playing field". Some people just weren't ready for that level of responsibility yet.

Mr. Boudreux has obligations to his neighbors and to society to cobble together a few PT jobs like his neighbor is doing.

While I'm no fan of Wells Fargo, it doesn't excuse Mr. Boudreaux's behavior. It's hard to have pity for someone living rent-free, and blaming his problems on someone else.
i agree
|
July 04, 2012
That's the first thing that popped in to my head reading the article. I don't have a problem with people cohabitating, but not a smart thing to get into a financial deal like this with someone you're not legally tied to.

I'm also no fan of the banks.....a lot of innocents are being screwed, but this specific instance speaks to a general lack of common fiscal sense.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides