Georgia Voices: Big government wins and individual rights lose
by The Augusta Chronicle
July 03, 2012 12:59 AM | 1072 views | 12 12 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court should horrify you. The high court said, in essence, that Congress can tax you for any reason it wants.

You haven’t bought an electric car? Extra taxes for you.

You’re not eating a certain amount of Brussels sprouts each month? Extra taxes. You’re not sitting up straight? Taxes.

That’s the message the court conveyed when it handed down its long-anticipated, historic ruling on “Obamacare” — the president’s disastrous health care act.

Constitutional experts bit their nails while waiting to see how the court would rule on whether Obamacare’s individual mandate requirement — effectively forcing people to purchase health insurance — would pass muster under the Obama administration’s flawed, sweeping interpretation of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.

In Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion, however, five of the nine justices tap-danced past that issue to reach another conclusion on the individual mandate: As Lyle Denniston at Bloomberg Law’s Scotusblog put it, “the Court did not sustain it as a command for Americans to buy insurance, but as a tax if they don’t.”

So if there’s any mode of behavior that Congress doesn’t like — from citizens not buying health insurance to constitutional experts biting their nails — Congress conceivably can now tax you for it, thanks to the decision laid out by the Supreme Court on Thursday.

What does this mean? As Jay Cost of The Weekly Standard points out, you’re going to see a huge transfer of wealth, regardless of your income or your social status.

“It transfers resources from the healthy to the sick, from the young to the old, without regard to who has more money to begin with,” he said. “Democrats typically rail against supposedly regressive GOP tax proposals, but nothing the Republicans have ever cooked up compares to the individual mandate.”

Oh, and by the way, now that the individual mandate is legally interpreted as a tax, it very well could qualify as the biggest middle-class tax increase in U.S. history — after President Obama specifically and emphatically promised he wouldn’t raise taxes on the middle class.

Is that a popular decision with you? According to MSNBC’s Chuck Todd it is. He told viewers Thursday morning that the Supreme Court fight “was the last obstacle and now that that’s out of the way, you’ll get a clear sense of the popularity of the law.”

More government intrusion into our lives? That’s supposed to be popular?

Hopefully this shattering court decision will rally Constitution-loving citizens in November.

If you believe in what that founding document really stands for, there should be absolutely nothing stopping you from transferring the Oval Office to someone who will stand firmly for the principles of our republic — instead of leaving it in the hands of someone doing his best to rip those principles apart.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kim Huffman
|
July 06, 2012
You dispose of tires?, you pay a "fee", you drink liquor?, you pay a tax, You smoke?, you pay a tax...you have a mortgage?, you deduct interest form taxes.

Taxes have been used to get people to do or not do things, like smoke/drink and encourage home ownership..so, imposing a whatever you want to call for someone who doesn't buy insurance is about the same thing...or those who do have insurance will always pay for the emergency room treatment those who don't get insurance will always use...build a bridge and get over it.
otter357
|
July 06, 2012
Just because you are too lazy to read the ACA and see for yourself, does not mean there are no more taxes in it. you Obama kool-aid drinking intellectual zombies are really in for a surprise.
JA Bolton
|
July 05, 2012
Hey, Repugs, it is NOT a tax. Mitt said so, that is until Grover Norquist pulled his puppet's stings.
Is it too late?
|
July 03, 2012
Great idea! Let's transfer the Oval Office to the guy who invented this health care plan in the first place. I'll bet Gingrich, Bachmann, Santorum et al. now wish they had stuck it out to Tampa. Once again we get no conservative choice for president. I hope the delegates revolt against Mitt and pick somebody else.
rjsnh
|
July 03, 2012
"The sky is falling! The sky is falling!" Get a grip...seriously, this is WORSE to you than Bush's senseless Irag War that would, itself, have funded healthcare for Americans....you conservatives love scare tactics...BOO!
Phoney argument
|
July 03, 2012
The big lie that this is the biggest tax ever is pathetic. This is a fine only on freeloaders who can afford insurance and fail to pay. That's it. Period. And calling it a big tax is a lie, one that leaves the editorial writers with a three foot nose.
TIC
|
July 03, 2012
@ Phoney Argument

The TAX for not buying health insurance is only one of the many TAXES that will be forcefully imposed on citizens if ObamaCare remains in effect.

If you care to take the time to inform yourself you will find that there are many other taxes/penalties incorporated into the Obamacare.

When you add them up and calculate the cumulative effect it IS the largest tax increase in our Nation's history.

now its another tax
|
July 03, 2012
TIC, if you are going to say there are other taxes name them! And tell us how much they will cost. Just another lie by the anti Obama crowd, the freeloader tax lie was discovered for what it is, now you claim there are other sorts of god awful taxes. You are also pathetic. Get your story straight.
Devlin Adams
|
July 03, 2012
For Now it's another tax. Just because you are too lazy to read the ACA and see for yourself, does not mean there are no more taxes in it. you Obama kool-aid drinking intellectual zombies are really in for a surprise.
Delvin any examples?
|
July 03, 2012
Or should we assume it's just another talking point with nothing behind it. You say read the ACA but did you read it? If so some examples please, if not where did you get your facts? Could it be some so called fair and balanced TV network or a radio talk show? Not buying the greatest tax claim. If its that great you would have examples up to the rafters.
Devlin ADams
|
July 03, 2012
Why bohter with examples? Your have already exhibited,with your belliogerent attitude, that you do not want to listen to anything but your liberal masters.

When you get you head of the sand, and want to leanr something, get back to me. .
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides