Court denies equal protection
by Dale Cardwell
June 14, 2012 12:15 AM | 1061 views | 2 2 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dale Cardwell<br>Business Columnist
Dale Cardwell
Business Columnist
slideshow
July 26, 2010, was one of the most liberty-affirming moments of my life. I was present when, after eight years of litigation, a federal jury unanimously agreed Atlanta businessman Billy Corey had been intentionally discriminated against by the city of Atlanta. It started in 2002, when Corey — a self-made businessman from humble beginnings in Atlanta’s Cabbagetown neighborhood — was denied a contract to supply advertising resources inside Atlanta’s airport.

Corey played by the rules. He’d offered to pay the city 11 percent more revenue than the airport’s longtime vendor. The problem — as the federal jury later confirmed — was that Corey’s bid threatened to unseat the contract incumbent Barbara Fouch; a former model and Beverly Hills, Calif., resident, who at the time of being awarded the deal — had absolutely no airport advertising credentials. What she did have, was connections to City Hall. Court testimony showed she was literally handed her share of the contract back in 1980, through her friendship with then-Mayor Maynard Jackson.

Corey played by the rules. He collected evidence proving his bid was wrongly denied, and sued. This was no small undertaking. Fighting City Hall comes with a price. You see, the city has unlimited resources — the taxpayers’ pockets. Corey — understanding the scope of what he was fighting for — made a $5 million investment; and on July 26, 2010, it seemed to have finally paid off. Atlanta’s unfair denial of his bid — was so obvious, that District Judge Charles Pannell described the city’s actions against Corey as “evil.” There were tears in the courtroom when, after eight long years, the jury delivered Corey justice and a $17.5 million verdict.

Last week, the sky turned green. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decided that despite overwhelming evidence, Corey didn’t deserve the protection of the U.S. Constitution. Why? Corey is not part of a protected “class” of Americans. You see, federal judges follow a code called precedent. If it hasn’t happened before, judges are extremely reluctant to create a “first.” In the past 50 years, federal judges have agreed to protect Americans based on age, sex, race, national origin, disability and religious affiliation. Those are our current “protected classes.” The tragedy is the three-judge panel ruled it should not spend its time protecting everyday citizens such as Billy Corey, even if — as the court wrote “it is true that the (bid) loss was based on subjective and arbitrary factors.”

As for the jury wanting to rectify that corrupted Atlanta bid process, the court added “The letting of municipal contracts ought not (sic) regularly be the start of a federal case … Governments must have more leeway than that in conducting bid processes for their contracts.”

Yes, Atlanta — with its rich history of bid rigging and airport contract corruption, in this court’s opinion, needs MORE “leeway” in conducting bid processes.

It’s no small coincidence Atlanta is caught up in another round of controversy regarding airport contacts. Once again, the city has awarded millions to connected individuals in the name of protecting disadvantaged businesses; only for the public to discover after the fact — the contracts were awarded to incredibly wealthy, politically connected individuals who fail to meet the disadvantaged standard. Even more frightening, is the precedent this court’s decision HAS created… What citizen will dare spend $5 million and eight years fighting for his or your constitutional rights — when a three judge panel can wipe out a unanimous jury verdict — delivered by everyday Americans?

God bless Billy Corey, and how he tried to protect us — from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

For great consumer advice and companies you can trust, visit TrustDale.com. Watch Dale on TrustDale TV, weekends on WXIA 11 Alive, and don’t miss his consumer problem-solving radio show, Sunday afternoons on WSB AM and NOW 95.5 FM.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
COBB CSI
|
June 14, 2012
Seems funny you’re talking about the consultation and your right in this case; but why are you and Clark Howard supporting an unconstitutional bill like the TSPLOST. Why aren’t whites, Hispanic’s and Asians minorities’ in the case of the airport, its reverse discrimination plain and simple? As long as you and Clark Howard support the TSPLOST we will not have you on your T.V. let me know how you can support that there isn’t any traffic relief in the TSPLOST I have attended the meetings it’s all Obama Pork Barrel projects that these liberal Republican’s want remember GEROGIA 400 liar liar pants on fire!! Did you catch the news last week Spain can’t afford to run their lovely Light Rail train that’s Cobb County 2017!!
Friendly Web Editor
|
June 14, 2012
COBB CSI:

While I understand your passion when it comes to the T-SPLOST, you really should contain your enthusiasm to articles that directly relate to it. It really has no bearing here.

I approved this today so I can make a point. Future off-topic rants similar to this one will not be allowed.

Hope you understand.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides