Walker win reminder of role played by ‘Yankee lady’ in Georgia education
by Roger Hines
Jun 10, 2012 | 1523 views | 8 8 comments | 19 19 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The recent recall election victory of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker should serve as a clarion call for restraint on the power of public sector unionism, particularly forced unionism. Walker’s decisive win and the bitter, prolonged battle that preceded it have evoked in my mind some memories of a former Cobb teacher who experienced a union problem and did something about it.

Pauline Gallagher was my oldest daughter’s fourth grade teacher at Kennesaw Elementary. A single lady, she was, in her own words, “married to the schoolhouse.” Her actions indicated as much. Untiring and relentless, she poured her life into teaching children.

Pauline re-located to Georgia from a union state because she wanted to teach in a right-to-work state, that is, one in which you cannot be required to join a union in order to teach.

One reason Pauline didn’t like her union’s contract was that it forbade her to work with her students during her lunch hour. She claimed that any benefit she received from union membership was negated by the restrictions it placed on her daily work as a teacher. She believed her union subordinated the needs of her school children to the aims of the union. For reasons of principle, she moved from New York to Georgia to teach.

Just before meeting Pauline at a parent-teacher conference and learning of her stance on public sector unions, I had made the decision to drop my membership from the Georgia Association of Educators; otherwise, a new policy would have required me to also join its parent organization, the National Education Association (NEA). The NEA had begun to take positions on peripheral social issues which had nothing to do with teaching school subjects and with which I could not agree. For all practical purposes, NEA had already become a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party.

From conversations with Pauline, I learned that she had already joined a new, non-union Georgia teacher’s organization (the Professional Association of Georgia Educators) that was not aligned with NEA. She convinced me to join this organization, which at the time had fewer than 100 members. The odds against its success were gigantic. NEA and its local affiliates were rich, powerful, and politically connected. Even so, at the urging of this “Yankee Woman,” as I called her, she and I became pioneers for a summer. On our own dime we toured northwest Georgia, stopping at local school district offices, leaving literature and informing administrators and teachers of a new professional option.

Whenever I grew discouraged from the grip that NEA had on Georgia teachers, Pauline merely doubled her enthusiasm.

Specifically, our argument to anyone who would listen was that any negotiations carried on between public employees (in this case, teachers) and their employers are false because the actual employers are the taxpaying public, not the publically elected officials who are sitting across the negotiating table.

When public employees sit down to negotiate, they bargain with such entities as mayors, city managers, county commissioners, school board members, etc., all of whom are public employees as well. This type of situation creates a false picture.

Unlike private-sector negotiation where both management and labor must be pragmatic enough for profits and jobs to continue, public-sector negotiations pit union members against politicians who often owe their position and power to the union members with whom they are negotiating. Hence the politician can give away the store, expect to receive union support during the next election, and hand the bill over to taxpayers.

Like the young Wisconsin governor who is fighting this false, corruptible and corrupting system, my “Yankee Woman” friend saw through it. Finding refuge in a right-to-work state, she chose to leave that system.

At that time, Georgia’s legislature was in total Democratic control, and the state’s NEA affiliate was an effective lobby. Even though Georgia was a right-to-work state, Pauline and I feared what could happen. And when President Jimmy Carter created the federal Department of Education to reward the NEA for its support, Pauline Gallagher got real serious.

I’m glad she did. Today PAGE is Georgia’s largest teacher organization, an effective, non-union association, 85,000 members strong. Today Pauline Gallagher can take heart that Govs. Walker of Wisconsin, Chris Christie of New Jersey, and John Kasich of Ohio are acknowledging and fighting what she was fighting when they were in their youth. Today she can revel in the fact that the Democratic governor of the state she left to escape forced unionism — New York — is also seeing the light and is sounding like a Republican on this very important issue.

Roger Hines of Kennesaw is a retired high school teacher and former state legislator.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Factodumb
|
June 15, 2012
Georgia's teachers are voiceless. None of their state organizations

are effective. Georgia politicians and school system leaders ignore

them. Why? Because they can with no consequence. Talk about

politics in Wisconsin. Talk about politics on Mars. Makes no difference here in good ole' G of A.
EduKtr
|
June 12, 2012
Also see Charles Krauthammer's excellent June 7 column "What Wisconsin Means" for a broader discussion of public-sector unions.
Partial Agreement
|
June 12, 2012
While I agree 100% with Mr. Hines' assessment of GAE and the NEA, I don't agree with his view of PAGE as being "effective." Having been a member of both PAGE and GAE, I found GAE to be too partisan and way too expensive. But, I also found PAGE to be too passive, ineffective at the local level (their local rep didn't even attend school board meetings), and too pro-administrator at the state level. Educators in GA need a third choice between the two extremes of PAGE and GAE.
Yuri Flapov
|
June 11, 2012
NEA is a political arm of the Democrat party. The charade is over. We, the taxpayers, have been on to this for years now. The last thing NEA cares about is education and children. NEA exists for one reason, to elect or reelect as many Democrats as possible.
3amyuma
|
June 11, 2012
You may have the right to work, but you won't have the right to a fair wage or decent working conditions. Unions of teachers, nurses, firefighters, and police are not the mafia, they are not the problem. Isn't GA ranked about next to last in education in the US. "Yankee Lady", seriously? When is the civil war going to end here?
CobbTaxpayerz
|
June 11, 2012
Georgia public sector workers have pay and benefits packages which well exceed those of comparable private sector workers.

So spare us the drama!
EduKtr
|
June 10, 2012
Why are taxpayers footing the bill to collect union dues from public-sector paychecks? Isn't it time to consider how taxes might be better spent?
Jane W.
|
June 10, 2012
One can learn more about the union by viewing the film "Waiting for Superman" or by Googling "NEA" and "donations."

It should be added that locally, GAE/NEA goes by the name of Cobb County Association of Educators (CCAE). Though claiming to be "non-partisan." GAE/NEA in fact endorses only Democrats for U.S. president and Georgia governor.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides