Council denies amendment for pawnshop
by Geoff Folsom
gfolsom@mdjonline.com
May 17, 2012 12:53 AM | 2034 views | 6 6 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
KENNESAW — The Kennesaw City Council voted down an amendment Wednesday evening that would have allowed a pawnshop in a Cobb Parkway strip mall to stay open.

The council voted 5-0 to agree with a recommendation from city planning and zoning staff, as well as the city’s planning commission, denying the request from property owner Celestino Venturi to amend his strip mall’s zoning to allow for a pawnshop for the duration of its five-year lease. He had allowed the Cruchelow Jewelry & Loan pawnshop to open on Dec. 28, 2011, in his Mack Dobbs Point shopping center at Cobb Parkway and Mack Dobbs Road, despite having agreed not to let a pawnshop, or 31 other types of business, to open at the site when he got initial zoning approval in 2004.

But a city oversight last year, and subsequent city council approval, allowed the pawnshop to get a business license, as well as pawn and precious metal licenses.

Lawyer Garvis Sams, who represented Venturi, said after the meeting that he planned to appeal the decision to Cobb Superior Court.

“We’re disappointed. We were hoping that they would have a different opinion and decision,” he said of the city council.

Sams, who has 30 days to file a challenge, said the property owner’s constitutional rights were violated.

“Their decision to prohibit us from using the shopping center for the highest and best use is tantamount to a taking of Mr. Venturi’s property rights,” he said.

The decision came at the end of a 45-minute special called meeting, attended by around 40 people, though some of them were there for a council work session later in the evening.

Some residents of the nearby Summer Stream and Summerbrooke subdivisions spoke against the pawnshop.

“The impact of this particular business is directly on these two subdivisions,” Gary Greenhut said. “It’s also on the church that’s across the street, and the new school across the street.”

One person, Thomas D. Smith, who claimed to be the only person who can easily see the shopping center from his house, spoke in favor of the pawnshop.

“I’ve had no problem with this business,” he said. “I’ve seen no difficulty with anything they do. I visited the pawnshop and thanked them for being there.”

After the meeting, Bill Harris, who has maintained a website critical of the pawnshop, said that not only is Venturi likely to sue the city, but he expects the pawnshop owners, John and Serena Cruchelow, to sue Venturi for letting them move into two suites in his strip mall, despite knowing that was not allowed.

“I’m very much in favor of it,” Harris said of the city’s decision. “It’s a positive thing, and we’ll see where it goes from here.”

Kennesaw Mayor Mark Mathews, who did not vote on the matter because he only votes in case of a tie, said he agrees with the rest of the council. He said he will wait and see whether a lawsuit is filed.

“We’ll have to go through the process and see what happens,” he said.

Councilman Bruce Jenkins said he was not concerned about the decision opening the city up to litigation; instead he was interested in “maintaining the integrity of the zoning that was originally in place and the agreement with the neighborhood.”

This was the second high-profile case Sams had lost in as many days, with the Cobb Board of Commissioners voting Tuesday against a permit that would have allowed another of his clients, the Bankhead C&D Transfer Station, to take in household garbage at its site in south Cobb. In both cases, Sams’ clients had gone ahead with their plans without zoning approval.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
If I was a juror
|
May 17, 2012
I'd like to see the following and have more information about and answers to:

1) The original zoning agreement in which the property owner and the City agreed/disallowed a pawn-shop

2) The process in which the "oversight" occured

a) Did the property owner properly seek a variance?

b) Did the property owner realize that the City was making a mistake?

c) Did the property owner then knowingly take advantage of that mistake?

or d) Did the City realize its mistake and knowingly allow it to go through?

The Observer
|
May 17, 2012
I was at that meeting, and it was clear who's minds were right and who's weren't. One thing for sure, Mr. Smith's testimony didn't help the shop's cause. In fact, he said one of the reason's why he liked the property in general was to cut behind the center to get to Summer Stream. Ladies and gentleman, that's illegal! He should have been arrested on the spot! Also, whether the mayor and the council liked it or not, this case is going to court, no matter what the ruling. The people of the neighborhoods had made plans to hire their own lawyer if the vote didn't go in their favor.
laughing out loud
|
May 17, 2012
I can't stop laughing at this mayor and council. Kennesaw is the laughing stock of the county, nay the state. I'm sure glad i don't live there and have to claim these yo-yo's as my mayor and council.
crying out loud
|
May 17, 2012
...yeah?....try living in Smyrna.

It's run like a secret little private club, that the citizens aren't welcomed to join!
FROM TEXAS
|
May 17, 2012
I guess because the city is guilty of malpractice and created the problem it’s not their fault, sounds like they owe this business man a lot of money. Don’t put PAWN SHOPS in a better location that way it can keep a sleazy reputation, a lot of my neighbors that never went to pawn shops have gone in the last few years, with this economy. Don’t worry when light rail comes up there their problems will just be starting just think of all the new unintended consequences that will happen?
Bill Harris
|
May 17, 2012
I look forward to reading any filing Mr Sams makes to the Cobb Superior Court arguing that Mr. Venturi's constitutional rights were violated.

To bad Mr. Venturi didn't have a better lawyer in 2004, someone who would have been looking out for Mr. Venturi's rights.



But wait a minute, I seem to recall that the Venturi lawyer from 2004 was Mr. Sams!



So the 2012 Mr Sams will now argue that the 2004 Mr. Sams was so incompetent that he drafted a 5 page document which violated his own clients constitutional rights.

An absolutely amazing argument!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides