EMC chief: 'Whole world has flipped’
by Kim Isaza
newseditor@mdjonline.com
May 13, 2012 12:46 AM | 3848 views | 13 13 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Cobb County EMC Interview - Part 1
Cobb County EMC Interview - Part 1
Cobb County EMC Interview - Part 2
Cobb County EMC Interview - Part 2
MARIETTA — New Cobb EMC board chairman Ed Crowell and CEO Chip Nelson sat down with Journal editors this week to discuss the nonprofit electric membership cooperative. The Marietta-based utility has just come through four years of a member-led litigation that resulted in a complete turnover of the 10-member board of directors.

Nelson spoke only briefly about the dissolution of the for-profit Cobb Energy and said the forensic audit will reveal the total losses related to Energy, though some have speculated the amount could be near $60 million. Today, he said, Cobb EMC is focused on cost-effective delivery of electricity to its 170,000-plus members.

“Think where we’ve come since last July,” Nelson said. “The whole world has flipped.”

Cobb EMC also owns Gas South, a natural-gas marketer, and has annual revenues between the two of more than $700 million. Nelson said both companies are profitable on a whole-year basis, with gas peaking in winter and electricity peaking in summer.

“We have negative months and we have positive months,” he said.

Crowell, who will serve as board chairman through the September annual meeting, said open board meetings are not off the table, but he worries that would give a few members who can attend special access to the board at the expense of most other members.

He also reiterated that the forensic audit will be done, but will take some time “to do it right.”

Of his predecessors on the board, Crowell stopped short of agreeing they took orders from the previous company head, Dwight Brown, rather than the other way around. But when talking about best-practices corporate governance resources the company is starting to use, Crowell said those resources had “been deliberately ignored by some of the previous folk at Cobb EMC.”

Of Brown’s pay package, which some have called obscene, Crowell agreed, “It was excessive, to say the least.”

“It’s not just the numbers, it’s how they were arrived at,” he said. “Those are the kinds of things you don’t want to ever see happen again.”

And although Crowell and Nelson both said there is a lot of changing and updating to be done, Crowell wouldn’t say the company was a mess.

“There’s a million things to be done in part because some things need to be changed,” Crowell said. “Bylaws and policies need to be updated, the forensic audit needs to be started. We need to set parameters for the CEO and how we evaluate his performance. … I don’t think it’s fair to say the place was a mess. The operational side of Cobb EMC is just stellar.”
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Flotsam and Jetsam??
|
May 18, 2012
Did y’all even watch to the video interview with Crowell and Nelson? Crowell has already decided that the comments from EMC employees through a whistleblower hotline will be mostly “flotsam and jetsam” or in simpler terms “garbage.” Nelson didn’t intervene as a good leader on the behalf of EMC employees as he should; but maybe he is so unsophisticated that he doesn’t know what the term means – not!!!

And they said Tripper Sharp was tough on EMC employees!

And Crowell did campaign on open board meetings, and also Nelson stated they would be a good idea. Apparently they are now both back tracking on the idea. They now state it would only be beneficial to special interest groups. Well who got us to where we are today, from the reign of Brownie, but parties that were especially interested in the welfare of Cobb EMC?

So who do Nelson and Crowell represent? Certainly not Cobb EMC employees whose potential hotline calls they pre-defined as garbage. Certainly not EMC Members to whom they are reneging on their promises for open board meetings. So who is it? Well it appears that it’s still Brown, Kelly, Alford, Sherali and Rayder.

Proved his point
|
May 18, 2012
You are proof they will get a lot of garbage - people like you who can't even pay attention. Crowell is clearly saying a hotline is something they will do despite the fact some people will call in with garbage, because they might get something good out of it. He's explaining why it's a valuable tool - but you clearly decided you don't like him (after one interview) so you hear only what you want to hear.

Pay attention. This guy's actually saying all the right things. Just because he doesn't scream about Sherali, Rayder, and others doesn't mean he isn't doing anything. At the town hall meeting he begged people to stay attentive, read the posted minutes, check the financials and keep asking questions. Doesn't sound like a guy afraid to talk to members or trying to hide anything.
anonymous
|
May 18, 2012
@ Proved his point

So what's your point? That it's OK for Nelson and Crowell to allow the corruption to continue with Rayder, Sherali and the rest?

I heard what @ Flotsam and Jetsam heard in the video interview - that the majority of employee opinions have been predetermined by Crowell to be garbage. What encouragement and leadership. What a pompous a**!

Nelson remained mute like always.

I think you proved that there are still a lot of Brownie plants out there and nothing more.

3 cheers
|
May 18, 2012
Read the whole of both articles and it's clear Crowell understands what a director should do. I laugh at the few (10 or 20 out of 180,000?) who seem all worked up about him saying there are consequences to changes like open board meetings that need to be examined. The board should take 6 months, not 6 minutes to make changes like that and they should look at all the positive and negatives - shame on them if they don't.

His answer on the audit is exactly right, and so is his answer about brown. Hope the rest of the new board is as sharp. If so, 3 cheers for all of them.

BusinessAsUsual
|
May 16, 2012
Open meetings are now a waste? Nelson promised them close to a year ago. Any member can attned if they want to and there can be rules for member audience participation. No big deal. What are these guys afraid of?
another anonymous
|
May 16, 2012
This is not Nelson's decision. It is up to the board.
dmkochatl
|
May 14, 2012
Well DA-- u think the Directors,Mr. Nelson & Mr. Kelly, attorneys, etc took orders from Mr. Brown. They were all well paid to go along with Mr. Brown's "Vision" for Cobb EMC...

The audit of Cobb Energy should begin ASAP--FULL findings should be reported/published to all EMC members within 12 months or less.

The stink will continue until there is full disclosure...
Open Meetings
|
May 14, 2012
Ed Crowell campaign for open board meetings and now he is against open board meetings. Sounds like we have another Dwight Brown on the board or at the very least another one who likes to mislead the members.
Paid attention
|
May 14, 2012
You are dead wrong. Crowell said in every campaign meeting (i sat through all he was in) he thought opening written records and creating accountability were the most important things. He never once campaigned on open board meetings. In more than one meeting he pointed out the mess that both the school board and county commission have with their "open" meetings.

Whether you agree or not with his position, he has been consistent, and honestly I thought the town hall was good. It could be great if they stick with it and members ask tough questions.
You should listen
|
May 15, 2012
I am pretty sure I was at every meeting Crowell went to. never heard him promise open board meetings. Heard him warn what a waste they were using school board and county commission for example and pointing out the EMC isn't government. He said he supported "real accountability" for members to be able check numbers and see all decisions.

Like it or don't but so far, he's doing what he said.
I was There
|
May 16, 2012
Ed Crowell did say he supported open board meetings when he was campaigning. He only started saying otherwise after he was elected.
JaniceK
|
May 13, 2012
The first "policy" that needs to be "updated" is that all EMC employees - from top to bottom - need a clear change in attitude that reflects their understanding that they work for the MEMBERS. The members have already shown that we do not work for the benefit of the EMC's management, but rather they work for us.
EMC Fan
|
May 13, 2012
I agree with not going to the expense of having open Board meetings for a select few who have made following the EMC's troubles a hobby. Town Hall meetings are enough. We elected these directors to represent us so give them a chance.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides