Ethics reform: State’s lousy score should bring positive action
by The Athens Daily News
March 23, 2012 12:00 AM | 1523 views | 4 4 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
There might well be some reasons to question the conclusions of a report from Public Radio International and two nonprofit groups, the Center for Public Integrity and Global Integrity, that placed Georgia last in the nation in terms of safeguards against public corruption.

There is almost certainly room for widely varying interpretations of conclusions based on responses to a 330-question survey of “corruption risk indicators” from open-records laws to campaign finance rules to state government finance procedures.

However, when any survey finds that the state fails to measure up in nine of 14 areas of inquiry — Georgia earned an “F” for its lobbyist disclosure rules, public access to information, political financing and legislative accountability, among other areas, according to media reports — there are right ways and, well, not-so-right ways, for elected officials to respond.

The right response to the CPI survey is illustrated by state Sen. Josh McKoon (R-Columbus). An advocate of ethics reform and a member of the Senate Ethics Committee, McKoon told The Telegraph newspaper that the study “raises very troubling questions about changes we need to make.”

The not-so-right response is illustrated by state Rep. Joe Wilkinson (R-Sandy Springs), chairman of the House Ethics Committee. He complained to the Atlanta newspaper about being blindsided by the study and went on to criticize the person who gathered information on Georgia for the CPI report — a former AJC editor who now operates a website. Wilkinson complained that Georgia was “judged by a blogger instead of a regulatory official, as has been done in the past.” He went on to note that “previous discussions with the Center for Public Integrity” created an “assumption that the 2012 rankings would show Georgia in the top five states.”

With all due respect to Wilkinson, any assumption about the 2012 ranking rings particularly hollow in connection with what the legislature failed to do this year in the arena of ethics reform. A legislative proposal from McKoon that would have limited lobbyists’ gifts to legislators to $100 died in the state Senate.

As reported by Georgia Public Broadcasting, last year’s lobbyist largess totaled $1.8 million, an average of more than $7,500 for each of the state’s 236 legislators. The fact that lawmakers couldn’t bring themselves to consider a $100 limit on lobbyist gifts — and that’s a $100 “per event” limit, not an absolute per-legislative-session limit — is, begging Wilkinson’s pardon, more than ample evidence that Georgia might have deserved the poor CPI ranking in terms of public corruption and government openness regulations.

It’s important to note, as Caitlin Ginley, project manager for the CPI report, did that the surveys were “not measuring actual corruption. This is a look at the opposite: the laws, policies and procedures in place to prevent corruption and how effective they are.”

While it’s certainly too late in the current Georgia General Assembly session for the conclusions in the CPI report to be translated into specific legislative initiatives, it will be interesting to see whether lawmakers remember those conclusions as they prepare for next year’s session.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Maatf
|
March 26, 2012
I am with you, rjshn. Kick them all out.

rjshn
|
March 23, 2012
I'm taking the pledge...I will NOT vote for a single incumbent legislator. It they are unopposed I plan to write in a name. I simply will no longer vote for those that REFUSE to set high ethical standards for themselves. And, I encourage other voters to do the same to send a message that we are tired of self serving politicians.
Don McAdam
|
March 23, 2012
Even if Wilkinson agreed to sponsor or co-sponsor legislation placing a limit on lobbyist gifts, Ralston would make sure the bill never got to a floor vote.

As the above piece points out, McKoon's bill would have merely limited each gift to $100. Still there would be an unlimited number of gifts, a huge loophole!

Also, this limit on lobbyist gifts is only one out of dozens of ethical failings in Georgia's laws and practices.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides