Bill Press: Requiem for Rush
March 12, 2012 12:00 AM | 1347 views | 2 2 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
One thing about Rush Limbaugh: When he steps in it, he steps in it big time. And he sure did so this time.

For El Rushbo, as he proudly calls himself, it started out as a classic Republican Party smear campaign: When you can’t defend your own party’s policy, launch a personal attack against those on the other side. It’s always worked for Rush in the past. As I document in my new book “The Obama Hate Machine,” Rush is the king of smears against President Obama. He regularly refers to him as “Imam Obama” and the “first Muslim president.” He’s called him an “economic ignoramus” and a “jackass.” He alone, citing an investigative report by Cat Corben, accused Obama on air of cheating on his wife when he was supposed to be attending his daughters’ soccer game. And he contends that Obama was elected president only because he was black and that, were he not black, he would be nobody today but a tour guide in Honolulu.

Over the years, Limbaugh has directed some of his ugliest attacks against women: branding all feminists as “feminazis,” comparing Nancy Pelosi to a “suicide bomber” and calling the National Organization for Women a “terrorist organization.” And, for a long time, he was able to get away with it — as long as his targets were prominent politicians or celebrities. But this time, he picked the wrong victim: A Georgetown University law student named Sandra Fluke, whose only “crime” was asking to testify before Congress — in support of President Obama’s policy to include birth control as part of every woman’s basic health insurance policy, and against Republican efforts to overturn it.

“What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke (sic), who goes before a congressional committee and says that she must be paid to have sex,” Rush asked his adoring audience on Wednesday, February 29. “What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute.”

When, at first, he didn’t stir the kind of controversy he thrives on, Rush doubled down: Insisting that if men were going to pay for Fluke and others to have all the “recreational sex” they wanted (you’d think a man who’d been married four times would know a little more about the pill), then men should at least be rewarded in return with videotape of her having sex. That sick comment indeed unleashed a firestorm of outrage and may have triggered the final unraveling of Limbaugh’s long, disgusting, and inglorious media career.

By the end of the week, after the first few corporate sponsors had canceled their advertising on his program, Rush was forced to issue an apology. It was perhaps the first apology of his career, and undoubtedly, the most insincere apology ever — driven, clearly, not by any regret for the language he used in attempting to discredit Ms. Fluke, but by fear of losing any more advertisers. But, to their great credit, advertisers were not convinced. They know a phony when they see one. It didn’t make any difference how many times Rush reminded them how much money they’d made advertising on his program, they simply no longer wanted to be associated with America’s merchant of hate. By this writing, more than 40 sponsors had dropped Rush’s program, including such corporate giants as Quicken Loans, ProFlowers, Sleep Number mattresses and Legal Zoom.

The courage of advertisers, however, appears in stark contrast to the timidity of Republican leaders. This could have been Mitt Romney’s “Sister Souljah” moment. Instead, he merely avowed that “slut” and “prostitute” would not have been his “choice of words” — leading Obama adviser David Axelrod to wonder how Romney could be trusted to stand up to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad if he was afraid to stand up to Rush Limbaugh. By their near silence, Republicans signaled either their assent with Limbaugh’s comments or their fear of him. More likely, the latter.

In the end, the market alone will decide whether Limbaugh survives or soon joins Glenn Beck in no man’s land. But the controversy surrounding his unwarranted attack on Sandra Fluke raises again the question of what talk radio is all about. Those of us privileged enough to be given the microphone have the opportunity and responsibility to inform, entertain, involve, and maybe even inspire our listeners. Those who use the microphone only to attack and demean others don’t merit the microphone — and deserve to lose it.

Bill Press is host of a nationally-syndicated radio show
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Jim Stoll
|
March 12, 2012
As I have said before, Rush Limbaugh is not one of my favorite people, but tell me: Why are all you columnists banging him around over his comments about someone talking about getting paid to promote, or practice illict or "recreational" sex in college. I have spent 4 years in the Navy and I am not a prude, but your writings are beginning to make me sick to my stomach Illicit sex used to be a subject that was only discussed by a gaggle of women when they were sure no men were listening. Now, it consumes more column inches of print that the murder of thousands of innocent women and children in Syria, yet no one is willing to do anything to stop that. If you all can't find anything better to write about than the attitudes of our middle class young people in college about recreational sex,your attitudes about the attitudes of others, about an open discussion of any kind of sex, in print, tells us a lot about you as well as those you write about. You should consider taking a vacation and visiting a church for some serious contemplation.
anonymous
|
March 12, 2012
"a woman whose only "crime" was asking to testify before congress--In support of President Obama's policy to include birth control in every womans basic health insurance policy, and against Republcans efforts to overturn it." Appearently you cannot or will not understand that this is about womens health not promoting or getting paid for "recreational sex" in college. Some women require this medication for Endometriosis, ovarian cysts, menstrual problems, acne in addition to family planning. This is between a woman her doctor and her insurance company, not you.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides