Now they are among the families coming back to cities like Birmingham, as the mass deportations never materialized and courts blocked parts of the law. No one knows how many people initially left the state, so it’s impossible to say how many have returned. But some illegal immigrants are trickling back, unable to find work elsewhere and missing the place that had been home for years.
Of 18 Hispanic immigrants interviewed by The Associated Press in the Birmingham area, six said they had friends or relatives who had returned to Alabama after fleeing because of the law.
As for Jimenez, she left Birmingham with her husband, father and brother three days after the law took effect. Now, all except her brother are back. Jimenez said through a translator that not much had changed, though she can’t reclaim her job at a McDonald’s restaurant because managers are checking citizenship papers.
“Everything is the same. I just can’t work now,” Jimenez said through a translator. She said the family is living off the income of her husband, who installs carpet and flooring.
The Obama administration, immigrant groups and others sued over Alabama’s law, and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is set to consider arguments about it on March 1. The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments a month later over Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigration, which isn’t considered as strict as Alabama’s.
Republicans who supported the crackdown had said they hoped the tough provisions — which made it difficult if not impossible to legally find work and housing, among other things — would force people to “self-deport” and move out of the state.
Among those who self-deported were Verenece Flores and her husband. They sold their home in metro Birmingham and moved with their three young children to Chicago. But the couple, originally from Mexico and living in the U.S. without legal documents, also could not find work, and relatives told them people weren’t being deported after traffic stops as some had feared.
The family is staying with relatives and doesn’t have their own place, and Flores remains “a little scared” of the law. But she said she was happy to be back. Flores had lived here for 15 years before the short move to Chicago, and her children are happier and her husband is back working construction jobs.
“I missed everything about it — friends, family, the weather,” Flores said. She knows two more families that left Alabama for Washington state only to return.
Estela Fuentes said friends of hers moved to Atlanta because the law required that public schools verify the citizenship status of students, yet they returned late last month after learning courts had put that section of the law on hold. The family was sad throughout its exile to Georgia, she said through a translator.
“One of their daughters cried and cried because she had no friends over there,” said Fuentes, who is originally from El Salvador.
And while there are families returning, some officials say they haven’t heard anything to suggest the numbers are huge. Zayne Smith, an immigration attorney with the nonprofit Alabama Appleseed legal center in Montgomery, said she had been hearing that some people wanted to wait until after the 11th Circuit considers the case in March.
State agriculture officials who say the new law led to a chronic shortage in agricultural labor said they haven’t seen evidence of large numbers of immig-rants returning to the state. Many immigrants worked in the state’s poultry processing plants or out in tomato fields, planting and harvesting crops.