High court upholds Ariz. e-verify law
by Mark Sherman
Associated Press
May 26, 2011 11:34 AM | 815 views | 2 2 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
WASHINGTON (AP) _ The Supreme Court has sustained Arizona’s law that penalizes businesses for hiring workers who are in the United States illegally, rejecting arguments that states have no role in immigration matters.

By a 5-3 vote, the court said Thursday that federal immigration law gives states the authority to impose sanctions on employers who hire unauthorized workers.

The decision upholding the validity of the 2007 law comes as the state is appealing a ruling that blocked key components of a second, more controversial Arizona immigration enforcement law. Thursday’s decision applies only to business licenses and does not signal how the high court might rule if the other law comes before it.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a majority made up of Republican-appointed justices, said the Arizona’s employer sanctions law “falls well within the confines of the authority Congress chose to leave to the states.”

Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, all Democratic appointees, dissented. The fourth Democratic appointee, Justice Elena Kagan, did not participate in the case because she worked on it while serving as President Barack Obama’s solicitor general

Breyer said the Arizona law upsets a balance in federal law between dissuading employers from hiring illegal workers and ensuring that people are not discriminated against because they may speak with an accent or look like they might be immigrants.

Employers “will hesitate to hire those they fear will turn out to lack the right to work in the United States,” he said.

Business interests and civil liberties groups challenged the law, backed by the Obama administration.

The measure was signed into law in 2007 by Democrat Janet Napolitano, then the governor of Arizona and now the administration’s Homeland Security secretary.

The employer sanctions law has been only infrequently used. It was intended to diminish Arizona’s role as the nation’s hub for immigrant smuggling by requiring employers to verify the eligibility of new workers through a federal database. Employers found to have violated the law can have their business licenses suspended or revoked.

Lower courts, including the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, previously upheld the law.

The case is Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 09-115.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Watcher...
|
May 26, 2011
Wonderful news for the United States.
Pat H
|
May 26, 2011
Great! Employers who hire illegals is the crux of the problem - no more hiding behind subcontractors subcontractors shell game - if a contract is awarded then whoever gets the money for that contractor better be sure that every employee is legal. Oh, that would include brick layers, too.

What most people do not understand is simple economics - businesses do not provide jobs, consumers provide jobs. Businesses try to make the most profit and have done so by hiring illegals. Most of this money does not go back to businesses to increase demand, it gets sent out of the country or spent at Pedro's rag tag Hispanic grocery store. And the illegals are draining our resources in benefits, schooling and free healthcare.

China is doing well because its citizens have jobs (our jobs) and are able to purchase things that reward the businesses that hire them. As long as business gets a special break, our economy will not recover.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides