Latest Photos

Cutting Carnage — Changes overdue along Dallas Highway
Jun 19, 2013 | 0 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In a county traversed by three major interstate highways where average speeds often seem to hit the 90 mph mark, one of the most dangerous stretches of road in recent years has, improbably, been the segment of Dallas Highway between Old Hamilton and Bob Cox roads in front of the Avenue West Cobb shopping center. An average of nine accidents a year have taken place at the entrance to The Avenue since 2009, including a fatality on May 15. Another fatal accident took place at the Dallas Highway intersection with Old Hamilton/Casteel roads in 2011, with a third fatal accident taking place that year at the Dallas Highway/West Sandtown Road intersection a half mile to the east. According to Cobb Commission Chairman Tim Lee, there is not enough distance for drivers on Dallas Highway who are turning into the Avenue mall to see oncoming eastbound traffic on the highway. And a similar condition exists at the Dallas Highway/Old Hamilton/Casteel intersection near the western entrance to the mall. The county now has changed the two traffic lights so that as of last week, westbound drivers turning left are only able to do so when eastbound traffic has come to a full stop. “Like any issue like that, it will increase congestion, but the improved safety outweighed the increased congestion that may occur at that intersection,” Lee said. The cost to taxpayers is about $5,000 per intersection — a pittance, especially when one considers the potential savings in lives and property damage. Other changes are afoot as well. The state Department of Transportation is planning to extend the left-turn lanes at The Avenue, which will create more “storage” space for cars waiting to make that turn. And the county is hoping to persuade the state to approve a similar alteration to the traffic light at the Dallas Highway/Bob Cox Road intersection, where eastbound travelers hoping to turn onto Bob Cox must also contend with short sight-lines caused by a hill. Equally important, the county wants to lower the speed limit to 45 mph from 55. “We believe a lower speed limit will give drivers more time to see and react to other cars in the area in order to avoid collisions,” county spokesman Bob Quigley said. The county cannot make such changes unilaterally, because Dallas Highway is a state road (S.R. 120). Those changes are overdue, but none the less are welcome. As noted above, they should go far to reduce the carnage to life and property on one of Cobb’s busiest roads.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Woodstock police dog dies of heatstroke
by Michelle Babcock
Jun 19, 2013 | 1464 views | 4 4 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
slideshow
A Woodstock police officer is on paid leave and an investigation is underway into the death of a 3-year-old police dog that died from heatstroke in his handler’s patrol car Monday night, police say.
 
Woodstock Police Officer Chad Berry is on paid administrative leave pending the results of an internal investigation into the death of his police dog Spartacus, who was found dead by Berry at his residence in Jasper around 9 p.m., according to police reports.
 
The Pickens County Sheriff’s Office went to Berry’s house in Jasper when they received a report of the dog’s death from the owner and are conducting their own investigation into the incident, a spokesman said. 
 
Pickens Sheriff’s spokesperson Kris Stancil said that it’s possible the police dog was in Berry’s patrol car for about six hours from 3 to 9 p.m.
 
Stancil said there could be charges made against the officer for animal cruelty if investigators determine there was intentional neglect or cruelty involved, but said it’s too early in the investigation to know.
 
Woodstock Police said a memorial service will be announced for Spartacus in the future, and said the handler is “devastated by the loss.”
 
“We are committed to the care and proper treatment of our working K-9s,” said Woodstock Police spokesperson Brittany Duncan. “We are mourning the loss of one of our own.”
 
Berry has handled police dogs for nine years and his first police dog, who is retired, now lives with his family. Spartacus was a Belgian Malinois and worked in narcotics detection, tracking, and apprehension. 
 
The investigation is expected to be wrapped up later this week, Stancil said.
 
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Witchataw
|
8 Hours Ago
This is a really sad situation. I really feel bad for all involved.
IceDogg
|
12 Hours Ago
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. When a civilian does the same thing, they are charged with felony animal cruelty. And isn't the K9 considered a police officer? That should be even worse than neglectfully killing a "civilian dog". We'll see how the police treat (or give special treatment to) their own.

I have my suspicions that this is the last we'll hear of this though. They'll just sweep it under the carpet.
A Taxpayer
|
12 Hours Ago
The guy who killed this dog was a 9-year veteran of the police force?? Release the name of that idiot !! What a negligent fool
Just Wait
|
12 Hours Ago
I certainly hope this was a tragic accident. If not, the officer should be prosecuted. Things like this just should not happen.
Nunn-Lugar’s reprieve aids global security
by Martin Schram
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 595 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Little noticed amid the U.S.-Russian disagreement over Syria’s civil war, Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin reached a last-minute agreement Monday that may prove more vital to long-term global security. They salvaged the historic Nunn-Lugar threat reduction program that has been keeping us safe by keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of would-be terrorists. For months, a proud and resolute Putin had seemed willing to let the program expire this month. Indeed, it was Obama who announced the agreement in their joint news briefing. Putin, who spoke first, didn’t mention it. The two leaders met for two hours in Northern Ireland at the annual summit of the Group of 8 industrialized nations. At issue: the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, more widely known by the names of the two former U.S. senators — Sam Nunn, D-Ga., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind. — who sponsored it two decades ago. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Nunn and Lugar concluded its weapons of mass destruction were poorly secured and vulnerable to theft. The Nunn-Lugar program has funded the safeguarding and often the dismantling and destroying of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons around the world. Eventually, Nunn and Lugar worked to extend the program’s reach to other nations. So far, for about $500 million a year, Nunn-Lugar has: deactivated more than 7,600 nuclear warheads; destroyed 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles; destroyed 33 submarines capable of launching missiles; removed nuclear weapons from Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; destroyed 2,900 metric tons of Russian and Albanian chemical weapons agents. But last autumn, Putin began an aggressive effort to show the world Russia no longer needed or wanted to receive international aid. He expelled workers for the U.S. Agency for International Development, UNICEF and various nongovernmental organizations. Russia then announced it would not extend the Nunn-Lugar program. Russia said it wanted to secure its weapons arsenals, but didn’t need foreign aid to do it. Also, Russia was concerned about sharing nuclear security information. Putin said any future cooperative program would require a new, unspecified framework. Yet U.S. sources said that inside the Russian government, key atomic energy officials had strongly urged a continuation of the Nunn-Lugar effort. On Monday, Putin sat silently, staring straight ahead as Obama announced, “We’ll be signing here the continuation of the cooperation that was first established through the Nunn-Lugar program to counter potential threats of proliferation and to enhance nuclear security.” Obama chose his words carefully, because the program that is being extended with Russia will not have a number of the provisions of the original Nunn-Lugar program. Chemical and biological weapons will no longer be in the program, officials said, and the extensive defense cooperation will be vastly reduced. Still, Nunn told me he was pleased by the extension — which he looks at as a new starting point. “Overall, I’m very positive on it,” Nunn said. “But this has to be built on.” Nunn said a number of influential Russians remain concerned about the need to safeguard chemical and biological weapons. He added that cybersecurity safeguards need to be included in the new framework. Meanwhile, Nunn has been looking at a new generation of questions that go far beyond just an extension of his Nunn-Lugar safeguards and the comparatively minor squabbles that occupied Obama and Putin Monday. For the past two years, Nunn has worked with former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov and more than two dozen military, security and political experts from the United States, Russia and Europe on a report titled “Building Mutual Security in the Euro-Atlantic Region.” The report cuts through the usual geopolitical blather and warns: “The blunt truth is that security policies in the Euro-Atlantic region remain largely on Cold War autopilot: large strategic nuclear forces are ready to be launched in minutes; thousands of tactical nuclear weapons remain in Europe; a decades-old missile defense debate remains stuck in neutral; and new security challenges associated with prompt-strike forces, cybersecurity, and space remain contentious and inadequately addressed. This legacy contributes to tensions and mistrust across the Euro-Atlantic region and needlessly drives up the risks and costs of national defense at a time of unprecedented austerity and tight national budgets.” That should convince our leaders to focus on the tomorrow they are creating today by their every action — and mainly, inaction. Martin Schram writes political analysis for Scripps Howard News Service.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Georgia senators should vote ‘no’ on final cloture
by D.A. King
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 128 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, the Democrat President of the U.S. Senate, is apparently getting uncomfortable about the amnesty bill’s polling results. As this is written Wednesday morning, it looked like Reid would call for a final floor vote sometime very soon. He said he might keep the Senate working all weekend. Why? Speed and timing are important to all hustles. In simple terms, the deal is this: The Democrats will pretend they would actually plan do something to secure American borders and some of the Republicans will ignore 1986 and pretend that legalizing immigration crime will somehow prevent more illegal activity. And that they will win the White House in 2016 as a result. And that we can solve our unemployment crisis by importing millions of additional foreign workers. The more the pro-enforcement Americans learn about what National Review correctly calls “Rubio’s Folly,” the more pressure they are putting on their senators to put the entire 1,000 pages into a shredder. The “Vote no!” calls and emails are now flooding into Senate offices. To deter possible senatorial trickery, it is important to understand how the Senate voting procedure works. Before the body begins debate on any bill, it must vote to pass a “motion to proceed.” That has been done and required 60 votes. Then, to end debate, a motion called “final cloture” must also collect at least 60 votes. Only then can a final floor vote occur in which a simple majority can pass the bill (for the Obama-voter readers: there are 100 Senate seats, making 51 a majority). Why is this notable? Because in this system, senators who want to help a bill pass, but don’t want their fingerprints on it, can vote “yes” on final cloture, thereby allowing 51 of their colleagues to vote “yes” on the actual legislation. While they then vote “no.” “Yes” on final cloture and “no” on the actual legislation is how Georgia’s Senator Johnny Isakson voted on the unrelated gun bill earlier this year. National Review also quantifies the replacement worker figures in the bill with this comparison: “the 2007 Bush-Kennedy proposal was rejected in part because it would have added 125,000 new guest workers. The Gang of Eight bill would add 1.6 million in the first year, and about 600,000 a year after that: That’s the population of Philadelphia in year one and the population of Boston each year after” the conservative editors warned this week. That is in addition to the 33 million permanent immigrants the Obama-directed legislation would help add to the U.S. population in the next 10 years. You read that correctly — “Obama-directed.” A senior White House official recently told the New Yorker magazine that “no decisions are being made without talking to us about it ... this does not fly if we’re not O.K. with it.” Example of something that “does not fly?” for Obama? Try this: On Tuesday, the Senate considered two amendments that would have required the federal government to enforce security laws already in place before granting the illegal aliens another amnesty. One, from Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.), required the federal government to complete 350 miles of reinforced, double-layered fencing along the southwest border with Mexico before illegal aliens could be legalized. The amendment would have also required another 350 miles of fencing to be constructed before they could obtain green cards. The fencing requirement was already mandated in the Secure Fence Act of 2006. The amendment failed 39-to-54. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who claims to support a border fence, voted “no” along with the Gang of Eight Republicans. Another amendment, from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), would have required the federal government to complete the biometric entry/exit system at all ports of entry — including land crossings — before amnesty. Congress already mandated such a system in 1996. And five times since. Including in 2002, following the horror of 9/11. At least six of the 9/11 terrorists overstayed their visas. The amendment failed 36-to-58. “I-wanna-be-president” Marco Rubio said just last week that the tracking system was the “lynchpin to the whole bill.” In May, he told several news outlets he supported such a monitoring system. On Tuesday, however, along with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Obama Democrats, Rubio voted against the visa tracking amendment. Got that? Please direct all “does anybody remember 1986 or 9/11 or the American worker?” questions to both of Georgia’s Republican Senators. They should vote “no” on allowing a final floor vote. D.A. King is president of the Cobb-based Dustin Inman Society and a nationally recognized authority on immigration. He is not a member of any political party.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
It’s time to revive America’s can-do spirit
by Deroy Murdock
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I recently toured the Johnson Space Center here, while vacationing with my retired, itinerant, sainted parents. The most striking thing at NASA’s legendary facility is a Saturn V rocket. It lies within a giant hangar, beneath incredibly bright lights. It is humongous and breathtaking. In large red letters, the words UNITED STATES appear proudly along the vehicle’s length. It brought tears to my eyes. I thought: This is what America did, back when America did things. Today, America has that no-can-do spirit. The U.S. now wheezes beneath the crushing weight of lawsuits, environmental impact reports, diversity consultants, a $17 trillion national debt, entitlement proliferation, lethargic economic growth, the lowest labor-participation rate since 1979, relentless Twitter distractions, and the mind-dissolving effects of Kardashianization. When another Saturn V sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the moon in July 1969, America was a serious country. Forty-four summers hence, not so much. U.S. astronauts headed for the International Space Station now must hitchhike there on Russia’s rockets. Fare: $70.6 million per seat. Beyond America’s downshift in space, innovation seems stuck in a lower gear. When did a new invention make you slap your head in astonishment, as was routine for decades? Smartphones do grow smarter. Aside from that. ... Yes, the Saturn V was a product of big government — but not as big then as today. When Armstrong took “one small step for man,” Washington, D.C., spent 19.3 percent of gross domestic product. By 2011, its share was 24.5 percent. Besides, big government used the Saturn V to accomplish “one giant leap for mankind,” as Armstrong declared. Here on Earth, that mission catapulted America well ahead of the Marxist Soviet Union. Compare that to big government today: $787 billion squandered on a stimulus that stimulated nothing; green jobs that, at best, cost $575,000 each, and an entitlement state that expands as poverty grows. On a smaller but also irritating scale, conference-going IRS employees have occupied $3,500-per-night hotel rooms. The tax agency also spent $17,000 so “motivational artist” Erik Wahl could paint pictures of Michael Jordan and Bono. Meanwhile, America devolves from constitutional republic to banana republic. Federal abuse of power, spying on journalists, politically discriminatory tax agents, and official impunity thrive beneath a tropical canopy of incompetence and economic stagnation. America is becoming Venezuela with atomic weapons. Thanks to the high stakes of the Cold War, the clench-jawed relentlessness of the Greatest Generation, or perhaps some other factor(s), America once exuded gravity. That largely has floated away. As common sense evaporates, for instance, Petrona Smith told her Bronx Spanish students that “black” in that language is “negro.” Some took offense, and she got fired. Now, she is suing for damages. Tracey Hannema, a Manhattan dyslexic, is suing for 50 percent more time so she can take a medical-school admissions test in a quiet, distraction-free environment where she says she could boost her score. Will she also demand such tranquility in a hospital emergency room? Instead of an Apollo-style celebration of achievement and individual excellence, standards slide. NBC News recently profiled Oregon’s South Medford High School and its 21 valedictorians. At Alabama’s Enterprise High, 34 students are “first in their class.” It’s important not to over-romanticize this picture. The best and the brightest who built the Saturn V also authored the food stamp program that burgeons today. Medicaid barely wobbles along, 48 years after its creation. And Washington shipped some 2.6 million GIs to Vietnam. Some 58,000 returned in body bags. Still, there is something truly inspiring even now about the words with which President John F. Kennedy launched the Apollo program in September 1962: “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” Imagine a president of the United States challenging the American people this way. These days, in a nation perpetually on break, it would seem almost rude. Houston, we have a problem. Deroy Murdock is a Fox News contributor, a Scripps Howard News Service syndicated columnist and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Popular Stories

Cutting Carnage — Changes overdue along Dallas Highway
Jun 19, 2013 | 0 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In a county traversed by three major interstate highways where average speeds often seem to hit the 90 mph mark, one of the most dangerous stretches of road in recent years has, improbably, been the segment of Dallas Highway between Old Hamilton and Bob Cox roads in front of the Avenue West Cobb shopping center. An average of nine accidents a year have taken place at the entrance to The Avenue since 2009, including a fatality on May 15. Another fatal accident took place at the Dallas Highway intersection with Old Hamilton/Casteel roads in 2011, with a third fatal accident taking place that year at the Dallas Highway/West Sandtown Road intersection a half mile to the east. According to Cobb Commission Chairman Tim Lee, there is not enough distance for drivers on Dallas Highway who are turning into the Avenue mall to see oncoming eastbound traffic on the highway. And a similar condition exists at the Dallas Highway/Old Hamilton/Casteel intersection near the western entrance to the mall. The county now has changed the two traffic lights so that as of last week, westbound drivers turning left are only able to do so when eastbound traffic has come to a full stop. “Like any issue like that, it will increase congestion, but the improved safety outweighed the increased congestion that may occur at that intersection,” Lee said. The cost to taxpayers is about $5,000 per intersection — a pittance, especially when one considers the potential savings in lives and property damage. Other changes are afoot as well. The state Department of Transportation is planning to extend the left-turn lanes at The Avenue, which will create more “storage” space for cars waiting to make that turn. And the county is hoping to persuade the state to approve a similar alteration to the traffic light at the Dallas Highway/Bob Cox Road intersection, where eastbound travelers hoping to turn onto Bob Cox must also contend with short sight-lines caused by a hill. Equally important, the county wants to lower the speed limit to 45 mph from 55. “We believe a lower speed limit will give drivers more time to see and react to other cars in the area in order to avoid collisions,” county spokesman Bob Quigley said. The county cannot make such changes unilaterally, because Dallas Highway is a state road (S.R. 120). Those changes are overdue, but none the less are welcome. As noted above, they should go far to reduce the carnage to life and property on one of Cobb’s busiest roads.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Woodstock police dog dies of heatstroke
by Michelle Babcock
Jun 19, 2013 | 1464 views | 4 4 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
slideshow
A Woodstock police officer is on paid leave and an investigation is underway into the death of a 3-year-old police dog that died from heatstroke in his handler’s patrol car Monday night, police say.
 
Woodstock Police Officer Chad Berry is on paid administrative leave pending the results of an internal investigation into the death of his police dog Spartacus, who was found dead by Berry at his residence in Jasper around 9 p.m., according to police reports.
 
The Pickens County Sheriff’s Office went to Berry’s house in Jasper when they received a report of the dog’s death from the owner and are conducting their own investigation into the incident, a spokesman said. 
 
Pickens Sheriff’s spokesperson Kris Stancil said that it’s possible the police dog was in Berry’s patrol car for about six hours from 3 to 9 p.m.
 
Stancil said there could be charges made against the officer for animal cruelty if investigators determine there was intentional neglect or cruelty involved, but said it’s too early in the investigation to know.
 
Woodstock Police said a memorial service will be announced for Spartacus in the future, and said the handler is “devastated by the loss.”
 
“We are committed to the care and proper treatment of our working K-9s,” said Woodstock Police spokesperson Brittany Duncan. “We are mourning the loss of one of our own.”
 
Berry has handled police dogs for nine years and his first police dog, who is retired, now lives with his family. Spartacus was a Belgian Malinois and worked in narcotics detection, tracking, and apprehension. 
 
The investigation is expected to be wrapped up later this week, Stancil said.
 
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Witchataw
|
8 Hours Ago
This is a really sad situation. I really feel bad for all involved.
IceDogg
|
12 Hours Ago
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. When a civilian does the same thing, they are charged with felony animal cruelty. And isn't the K9 considered a police officer? That should be even worse than neglectfully killing a "civilian dog". We'll see how the police treat (or give special treatment to) their own.

I have my suspicions that this is the last we'll hear of this though. They'll just sweep it under the carpet.
A Taxpayer
|
12 Hours Ago
The guy who killed this dog was a 9-year veteran of the police force?? Release the name of that idiot !! What a negligent fool
Just Wait
|
12 Hours Ago
I certainly hope this was a tragic accident. If not, the officer should be prosecuted. Things like this just should not happen.
Nunn-Lugar’s reprieve aids global security
by Martin Schram
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 595 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Little noticed amid the U.S.-Russian disagreement over Syria’s civil war, Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin reached a last-minute agreement Monday that may prove more vital to long-term global security. They salvaged the historic Nunn-Lugar threat reduction program that has been keeping us safe by keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of would-be terrorists. For months, a proud and resolute Putin had seemed willing to let the program expire this month. Indeed, it was Obama who announced the agreement in their joint news briefing. Putin, who spoke first, didn’t mention it. The two leaders met for two hours in Northern Ireland at the annual summit of the Group of 8 industrialized nations. At issue: the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, more widely known by the names of the two former U.S. senators — Sam Nunn, D-Ga., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind. — who sponsored it two decades ago. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Nunn and Lugar concluded its weapons of mass destruction were poorly secured and vulnerable to theft. The Nunn-Lugar program has funded the safeguarding and often the dismantling and destroying of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons around the world. Eventually, Nunn and Lugar worked to extend the program’s reach to other nations. So far, for about $500 million a year, Nunn-Lugar has: deactivated more than 7,600 nuclear warheads; destroyed 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles; destroyed 33 submarines capable of launching missiles; removed nuclear weapons from Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; destroyed 2,900 metric tons of Russian and Albanian chemical weapons agents. But last autumn, Putin began an aggressive effort to show the world Russia no longer needed or wanted to receive international aid. He expelled workers for the U.S. Agency for International Development, UNICEF and various nongovernmental organizations. Russia then announced it would not extend the Nunn-Lugar program. Russia said it wanted to secure its weapons arsenals, but didn’t need foreign aid to do it. Also, Russia was concerned about sharing nuclear security information. Putin said any future cooperative program would require a new, unspecified framework. Yet U.S. sources said that inside the Russian government, key atomic energy officials had strongly urged a continuation of the Nunn-Lugar effort. On Monday, Putin sat silently, staring straight ahead as Obama announced, “We’ll be signing here the continuation of the cooperation that was first established through the Nunn-Lugar program to counter potential threats of proliferation and to enhance nuclear security.” Obama chose his words carefully, because the program that is being extended with Russia will not have a number of the provisions of the original Nunn-Lugar program. Chemical and biological weapons will no longer be in the program, officials said, and the extensive defense cooperation will be vastly reduced. Still, Nunn told me he was pleased by the extension — which he looks at as a new starting point. “Overall, I’m very positive on it,” Nunn said. “But this has to be built on.” Nunn said a number of influential Russians remain concerned about the need to safeguard chemical and biological weapons. He added that cybersecurity safeguards need to be included in the new framework. Meanwhile, Nunn has been looking at a new generation of questions that go far beyond just an extension of his Nunn-Lugar safeguards and the comparatively minor squabbles that occupied Obama and Putin Monday. For the past two years, Nunn has worked with former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov and more than two dozen military, security and political experts from the United States, Russia and Europe on a report titled “Building Mutual Security in the Euro-Atlantic Region.” The report cuts through the usual geopolitical blather and warns: “The blunt truth is that security policies in the Euro-Atlantic region remain largely on Cold War autopilot: large strategic nuclear forces are ready to be launched in minutes; thousands of tactical nuclear weapons remain in Europe; a decades-old missile defense debate remains stuck in neutral; and new security challenges associated with prompt-strike forces, cybersecurity, and space remain contentious and inadequately addressed. This legacy contributes to tensions and mistrust across the Euro-Atlantic region and needlessly drives up the risks and costs of national defense at a time of unprecedented austerity and tight national budgets.” That should convince our leaders to focus on the tomorrow they are creating today by their every action — and mainly, inaction. Martin Schram writes political analysis for Scripps Howard News Service.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Georgia senators should vote ‘no’ on final cloture
by D.A. King
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 128 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, the Democrat President of the U.S. Senate, is apparently getting uncomfortable about the amnesty bill’s polling results. As this is written Wednesday morning, it looked like Reid would call for a final floor vote sometime very soon. He said he might keep the Senate working all weekend. Why? Speed and timing are important to all hustles. In simple terms, the deal is this: The Democrats will pretend they would actually plan do something to secure American borders and some of the Republicans will ignore 1986 and pretend that legalizing immigration crime will somehow prevent more illegal activity. And that they will win the White House in 2016 as a result. And that we can solve our unemployment crisis by importing millions of additional foreign workers. The more the pro-enforcement Americans learn about what National Review correctly calls “Rubio’s Folly,” the more pressure they are putting on their senators to put the entire 1,000 pages into a shredder. The “Vote no!” calls and emails are now flooding into Senate offices. To deter possible senatorial trickery, it is important to understand how the Senate voting procedure works. Before the body begins debate on any bill, it must vote to pass a “motion to proceed.” That has been done and required 60 votes. Then, to end debate, a motion called “final cloture” must also collect at least 60 votes. Only then can a final floor vote occur in which a simple majority can pass the bill (for the Obama-voter readers: there are 100 Senate seats, making 51 a majority). Why is this notable? Because in this system, senators who want to help a bill pass, but don’t want their fingerprints on it, can vote “yes” on final cloture, thereby allowing 51 of their colleagues to vote “yes” on the actual legislation. While they then vote “no.” “Yes” on final cloture and “no” on the actual legislation is how Georgia’s Senator Johnny Isakson voted on the unrelated gun bill earlier this year. National Review also quantifies the replacement worker figures in the bill with this comparison: “the 2007 Bush-Kennedy proposal was rejected in part because it would have added 125,000 new guest workers. The Gang of Eight bill would add 1.6 million in the first year, and about 600,000 a year after that: That’s the population of Philadelphia in year one and the population of Boston each year after” the conservative editors warned this week. That is in addition to the 33 million permanent immigrants the Obama-directed legislation would help add to the U.S. population in the next 10 years. You read that correctly — “Obama-directed.” A senior White House official recently told the New Yorker magazine that “no decisions are being made without talking to us about it ... this does not fly if we’re not O.K. with it.” Example of something that “does not fly?” for Obama? Try this: On Tuesday, the Senate considered two amendments that would have required the federal government to enforce security laws already in place before granting the illegal aliens another amnesty. One, from Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.), required the federal government to complete 350 miles of reinforced, double-layered fencing along the southwest border with Mexico before illegal aliens could be legalized. The amendment would have also required another 350 miles of fencing to be constructed before they could obtain green cards. The fencing requirement was already mandated in the Secure Fence Act of 2006. The amendment failed 39-to-54. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who claims to support a border fence, voted “no” along with the Gang of Eight Republicans. Another amendment, from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), would have required the federal government to complete the biometric entry/exit system at all ports of entry — including land crossings — before amnesty. Congress already mandated such a system in 1996. And five times since. Including in 2002, following the horror of 9/11. At least six of the 9/11 terrorists overstayed their visas. The amendment failed 36-to-58. “I-wanna-be-president” Marco Rubio said just last week that the tracking system was the “lynchpin to the whole bill.” In May, he told several news outlets he supported such a monitoring system. On Tuesday, however, along with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Obama Democrats, Rubio voted against the visa tracking amendment. Got that? Please direct all “does anybody remember 1986 or 9/11 or the American worker?” questions to both of Georgia’s Republican Senators. They should vote “no” on allowing a final floor vote. D.A. King is president of the Cobb-based Dustin Inman Society and a nationally recognized authority on immigration. He is not a member of any political party.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
It’s time to revive America’s can-do spirit
by Deroy Murdock
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I recently toured the Johnson Space Center here, while vacationing with my retired, itinerant, sainted parents. The most striking thing at NASA’s legendary facility is a Saturn V rocket. It lies within a giant hangar, beneath incredibly bright lights. It is humongous and breathtaking. In large red letters, the words UNITED STATES appear proudly along the vehicle’s length. It brought tears to my eyes. I thought: This is what America did, back when America did things. Today, America has that no-can-do spirit. The U.S. now wheezes beneath the crushing weight of lawsuits, environmental impact reports, diversity consultants, a $17 trillion national debt, entitlement proliferation, lethargic economic growth, the lowest labor-participation rate since 1979, relentless Twitter distractions, and the mind-dissolving effects of Kardashianization. When another Saturn V sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the moon in July 1969, America was a serious country. Forty-four summers hence, not so much. U.S. astronauts headed for the International Space Station now must hitchhike there on Russia’s rockets. Fare: $70.6 million per seat. Beyond America’s downshift in space, innovation seems stuck in a lower gear. When did a new invention make you slap your head in astonishment, as was routine for decades? Smartphones do grow smarter. Aside from that. ... Yes, the Saturn V was a product of big government — but not as big then as today. When Armstrong took “one small step for man,” Washington, D.C., spent 19.3 percent of gross domestic product. By 2011, its share was 24.5 percent. Besides, big government used the Saturn V to accomplish “one giant leap for mankind,” as Armstrong declared. Here on Earth, that mission catapulted America well ahead of the Marxist Soviet Union. Compare that to big government today: $787 billion squandered on a stimulus that stimulated nothing; green jobs that, at best, cost $575,000 each, and an entitlement state that expands as poverty grows. On a smaller but also irritating scale, conference-going IRS employees have occupied $3,500-per-night hotel rooms. The tax agency also spent $17,000 so “motivational artist” Erik Wahl could paint pictures of Michael Jordan and Bono. Meanwhile, America devolves from constitutional republic to banana republic. Federal abuse of power, spying on journalists, politically discriminatory tax agents, and official impunity thrive beneath a tropical canopy of incompetence and economic stagnation. America is becoming Venezuela with atomic weapons. Thanks to the high stakes of the Cold War, the clench-jawed relentlessness of the Greatest Generation, or perhaps some other factor(s), America once exuded gravity. That largely has floated away. As common sense evaporates, for instance, Petrona Smith told her Bronx Spanish students that “black” in that language is “negro.” Some took offense, and she got fired. Now, she is suing for damages. Tracey Hannema, a Manhattan dyslexic, is suing for 50 percent more time so she can take a medical-school admissions test in a quiet, distraction-free environment where she says she could boost her score. Will she also demand such tranquility in a hospital emergency room? Instead of an Apollo-style celebration of achievement and individual excellence, standards slide. NBC News recently profiled Oregon’s South Medford High School and its 21 valedictorians. At Alabama’s Enterprise High, 34 students are “first in their class.” It’s important not to over-romanticize this picture. The best and the brightest who built the Saturn V also authored the food stamp program that burgeons today. Medicaid barely wobbles along, 48 years after its creation. And Washington shipped some 2.6 million GIs to Vietnam. Some 58,000 returned in body bags. Still, there is something truly inspiring even now about the words with which President John F. Kennedy launched the Apollo program in September 1962: “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” Imagine a president of the United States challenging the American people this way. These days, in a nation perpetually on break, it would seem almost rude. Houston, we have a problem. Deroy Murdock is a Fox News contributor, a Scripps Howard News Service syndicated columnist and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Recent Comments

Cutting Carnage — Changes overdue along Dallas Highway
Jun 19, 2013 | 0 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In a county traversed by three major interstate highways where average speeds often seem to hit the 90 mph mark, one of the most dangerous stretches of road in recent years has, improbably, been the segment of Dallas Highway between Old Hamilton and Bob Cox roads in front of the Avenue West Cobb shopping center. An average of nine accidents a year have taken place at the entrance to The Avenue since 2009, including a fatality on May 15. Another fatal accident took place at the Dallas Highway intersection with Old Hamilton/Casteel roads in 2011, with a third fatal accident taking place that year at the Dallas Highway/West Sandtown Road intersection a half mile to the east. According to Cobb Commission Chairman Tim Lee, there is not enough distance for drivers on Dallas Highway who are turning into the Avenue mall to see oncoming eastbound traffic on the highway. And a similar condition exists at the Dallas Highway/Old Hamilton/Casteel intersection near the western entrance to the mall. The county now has changed the two traffic lights so that as of last week, westbound drivers turning left are only able to do so when eastbound traffic has come to a full stop. “Like any issue like that, it will increase congestion, but the improved safety outweighed the increased congestion that may occur at that intersection,” Lee said. The cost to taxpayers is about $5,000 per intersection — a pittance, especially when one considers the potential savings in lives and property damage. Other changes are afoot as well. The state Department of Transportation is planning to extend the left-turn lanes at The Avenue, which will create more “storage” space for cars waiting to make that turn. And the county is hoping to persuade the state to approve a similar alteration to the traffic light at the Dallas Highway/Bob Cox Road intersection, where eastbound travelers hoping to turn onto Bob Cox must also contend with short sight-lines caused by a hill. Equally important, the county wants to lower the speed limit to 45 mph from 55. “We believe a lower speed limit will give drivers more time to see and react to other cars in the area in order to avoid collisions,” county spokesman Bob Quigley said. The county cannot make such changes unilaterally, because Dallas Highway is a state road (S.R. 120). Those changes are overdue, but none the less are welcome. As noted above, they should go far to reduce the carnage to life and property on one of Cobb’s busiest roads.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Woodstock police dog dies of heatstroke
by Michelle Babcock
Jun 19, 2013 | 1464 views | 4 4 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
slideshow
A Woodstock police officer is on paid leave and an investigation is underway into the death of a 3-year-old police dog that died from heatstroke in his handler’s patrol car Monday night, police say.
 
Woodstock Police Officer Chad Berry is on paid administrative leave pending the results of an internal investigation into the death of his police dog Spartacus, who was found dead by Berry at his residence in Jasper around 9 p.m., according to police reports.
 
The Pickens County Sheriff’s Office went to Berry’s house in Jasper when they received a report of the dog’s death from the owner and are conducting their own investigation into the incident, a spokesman said. 
 
Pickens Sheriff’s spokesperson Kris Stancil said that it’s possible the police dog was in Berry’s patrol car for about six hours from 3 to 9 p.m.
 
Stancil said there could be charges made against the officer for animal cruelty if investigators determine there was intentional neglect or cruelty involved, but said it’s too early in the investigation to know.
 
Woodstock Police said a memorial service will be announced for Spartacus in the future, and said the handler is “devastated by the loss.”
 
“We are committed to the care and proper treatment of our working K-9s,” said Woodstock Police spokesperson Brittany Duncan. “We are mourning the loss of one of our own.”
 
Berry has handled police dogs for nine years and his first police dog, who is retired, now lives with his family. Spartacus was a Belgian Malinois and worked in narcotics detection, tracking, and apprehension. 
 
The investigation is expected to be wrapped up later this week, Stancil said.
 
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Witchataw
|
8 Hours Ago
This is a really sad situation. I really feel bad for all involved.
IceDogg
|
12 Hours Ago
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. When a civilian does the same thing, they are charged with felony animal cruelty. And isn't the K9 considered a police officer? That should be even worse than neglectfully killing a "civilian dog". We'll see how the police treat (or give special treatment to) their own.

I have my suspicions that this is the last we'll hear of this though. They'll just sweep it under the carpet.
A Taxpayer
|
12 Hours Ago
The guy who killed this dog was a 9-year veteran of the police force?? Release the name of that idiot !! What a negligent fool
Just Wait
|
12 Hours Ago
I certainly hope this was a tragic accident. If not, the officer should be prosecuted. Things like this just should not happen.
Nunn-Lugar’s reprieve aids global security
by Martin Schram
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 595 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Little noticed amid the U.S.-Russian disagreement over Syria’s civil war, Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin reached a last-minute agreement Monday that may prove more vital to long-term global security. They salvaged the historic Nunn-Lugar threat reduction program that has been keeping us safe by keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of would-be terrorists. For months, a proud and resolute Putin had seemed willing to let the program expire this month. Indeed, it was Obama who announced the agreement in their joint news briefing. Putin, who spoke first, didn’t mention it. The two leaders met for two hours in Northern Ireland at the annual summit of the Group of 8 industrialized nations. At issue: the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, more widely known by the names of the two former U.S. senators — Sam Nunn, D-Ga., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind. — who sponsored it two decades ago. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Nunn and Lugar concluded its weapons of mass destruction were poorly secured and vulnerable to theft. The Nunn-Lugar program has funded the safeguarding and often the dismantling and destroying of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons around the world. Eventually, Nunn and Lugar worked to extend the program’s reach to other nations. So far, for about $500 million a year, Nunn-Lugar has: deactivated more than 7,600 nuclear warheads; destroyed 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles; destroyed 33 submarines capable of launching missiles; removed nuclear weapons from Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; destroyed 2,900 metric tons of Russian and Albanian chemical weapons agents. But last autumn, Putin began an aggressive effort to show the world Russia no longer needed or wanted to receive international aid. He expelled workers for the U.S. Agency for International Development, UNICEF and various nongovernmental organizations. Russia then announced it would not extend the Nunn-Lugar program. Russia said it wanted to secure its weapons arsenals, but didn’t need foreign aid to do it. Also, Russia was concerned about sharing nuclear security information. Putin said any future cooperative program would require a new, unspecified framework. Yet U.S. sources said that inside the Russian government, key atomic energy officials had strongly urged a continuation of the Nunn-Lugar effort. On Monday, Putin sat silently, staring straight ahead as Obama announced, “We’ll be signing here the continuation of the cooperation that was first established through the Nunn-Lugar program to counter potential threats of proliferation and to enhance nuclear security.” Obama chose his words carefully, because the program that is being extended with Russia will not have a number of the provisions of the original Nunn-Lugar program. Chemical and biological weapons will no longer be in the program, officials said, and the extensive defense cooperation will be vastly reduced. Still, Nunn told me he was pleased by the extension — which he looks at as a new starting point. “Overall, I’m very positive on it,” Nunn said. “But this has to be built on.” Nunn said a number of influential Russians remain concerned about the need to safeguard chemical and biological weapons. He added that cybersecurity safeguards need to be included in the new framework. Meanwhile, Nunn has been looking at a new generation of questions that go far beyond just an extension of his Nunn-Lugar safeguards and the comparatively minor squabbles that occupied Obama and Putin Monday. For the past two years, Nunn has worked with former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov and more than two dozen military, security and political experts from the United States, Russia and Europe on a report titled “Building Mutual Security in the Euro-Atlantic Region.” The report cuts through the usual geopolitical blather and warns: “The blunt truth is that security policies in the Euro-Atlantic region remain largely on Cold War autopilot: large strategic nuclear forces are ready to be launched in minutes; thousands of tactical nuclear weapons remain in Europe; a decades-old missile defense debate remains stuck in neutral; and new security challenges associated with prompt-strike forces, cybersecurity, and space remain contentious and inadequately addressed. This legacy contributes to tensions and mistrust across the Euro-Atlantic region and needlessly drives up the risks and costs of national defense at a time of unprecedented austerity and tight national budgets.” That should convince our leaders to focus on the tomorrow they are creating today by their every action — and mainly, inaction. Martin Schram writes political analysis for Scripps Howard News Service.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Georgia senators should vote ‘no’ on final cloture
by D.A. King
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 128 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, the Democrat President of the U.S. Senate, is apparently getting uncomfortable about the amnesty bill’s polling results. As this is written Wednesday morning, it looked like Reid would call for a final floor vote sometime very soon. He said he might keep the Senate working all weekend. Why? Speed and timing are important to all hustles. In simple terms, the deal is this: The Democrats will pretend they would actually plan do something to secure American borders and some of the Republicans will ignore 1986 and pretend that legalizing immigration crime will somehow prevent more illegal activity. And that they will win the White House in 2016 as a result. And that we can solve our unemployment crisis by importing millions of additional foreign workers. The more the pro-enforcement Americans learn about what National Review correctly calls “Rubio’s Folly,” the more pressure they are putting on their senators to put the entire 1,000 pages into a shredder. The “Vote no!” calls and emails are now flooding into Senate offices. To deter possible senatorial trickery, it is important to understand how the Senate voting procedure works. Before the body begins debate on any bill, it must vote to pass a “motion to proceed.” That has been done and required 60 votes. Then, to end debate, a motion called “final cloture” must also collect at least 60 votes. Only then can a final floor vote occur in which a simple majority can pass the bill (for the Obama-voter readers: there are 100 Senate seats, making 51 a majority). Why is this notable? Because in this system, senators who want to help a bill pass, but don’t want their fingerprints on it, can vote “yes” on final cloture, thereby allowing 51 of their colleagues to vote “yes” on the actual legislation. While they then vote “no.” “Yes” on final cloture and “no” on the actual legislation is how Georgia’s Senator Johnny Isakson voted on the unrelated gun bill earlier this year. National Review also quantifies the replacement worker figures in the bill with this comparison: “the 2007 Bush-Kennedy proposal was rejected in part because it would have added 125,000 new guest workers. The Gang of Eight bill would add 1.6 million in the first year, and about 600,000 a year after that: That’s the population of Philadelphia in year one and the population of Boston each year after” the conservative editors warned this week. That is in addition to the 33 million permanent immigrants the Obama-directed legislation would help add to the U.S. population in the next 10 years. You read that correctly — “Obama-directed.” A senior White House official recently told the New Yorker magazine that “no decisions are being made without talking to us about it ... this does not fly if we’re not O.K. with it.” Example of something that “does not fly?” for Obama? Try this: On Tuesday, the Senate considered two amendments that would have required the federal government to enforce security laws already in place before granting the illegal aliens another amnesty. One, from Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.), required the federal government to complete 350 miles of reinforced, double-layered fencing along the southwest border with Mexico before illegal aliens could be legalized. The amendment would have also required another 350 miles of fencing to be constructed before they could obtain green cards. The fencing requirement was already mandated in the Secure Fence Act of 2006. The amendment failed 39-to-54. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who claims to support a border fence, voted “no” along with the Gang of Eight Republicans. Another amendment, from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), would have required the federal government to complete the biometric entry/exit system at all ports of entry — including land crossings — before amnesty. Congress already mandated such a system in 1996. And five times since. Including in 2002, following the horror of 9/11. At least six of the 9/11 terrorists overstayed their visas. The amendment failed 36-to-58. “I-wanna-be-president” Marco Rubio said just last week that the tracking system was the “lynchpin to the whole bill.” In May, he told several news outlets he supported such a monitoring system. On Tuesday, however, along with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Obama Democrats, Rubio voted against the visa tracking amendment. Got that? Please direct all “does anybody remember 1986 or 9/11 or the American worker?” questions to both of Georgia’s Republican Senators. They should vote “no” on allowing a final floor vote. D.A. King is president of the Cobb-based Dustin Inman Society and a nationally recognized authority on immigration. He is not a member of any political party.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
It’s time to revive America’s can-do spirit
by Deroy Murdock
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I recently toured the Johnson Space Center here, while vacationing with my retired, itinerant, sainted parents. The most striking thing at NASA’s legendary facility is a Saturn V rocket. It lies within a giant hangar, beneath incredibly bright lights. It is humongous and breathtaking. In large red letters, the words UNITED STATES appear proudly along the vehicle’s length. It brought tears to my eyes. I thought: This is what America did, back when America did things. Today, America has that no-can-do spirit. The U.S. now wheezes beneath the crushing weight of lawsuits, environmental impact reports, diversity consultants, a $17 trillion national debt, entitlement proliferation, lethargic economic growth, the lowest labor-participation rate since 1979, relentless Twitter distractions, and the mind-dissolving effects of Kardashianization. When another Saturn V sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the moon in July 1969, America was a serious country. Forty-four summers hence, not so much. U.S. astronauts headed for the International Space Station now must hitchhike there on Russia’s rockets. Fare: $70.6 million per seat. Beyond America’s downshift in space, innovation seems stuck in a lower gear. When did a new invention make you slap your head in astonishment, as was routine for decades? Smartphones do grow smarter. Aside from that. ... Yes, the Saturn V was a product of big government — but not as big then as today. When Armstrong took “one small step for man,” Washington, D.C., spent 19.3 percent of gross domestic product. By 2011, its share was 24.5 percent. Besides, big government used the Saturn V to accomplish “one giant leap for mankind,” as Armstrong declared. Here on Earth, that mission catapulted America well ahead of the Marxist Soviet Union. Compare that to big government today: $787 billion squandered on a stimulus that stimulated nothing; green jobs that, at best, cost $575,000 each, and an entitlement state that expands as poverty grows. On a smaller but also irritating scale, conference-going IRS employees have occupied $3,500-per-night hotel rooms. The tax agency also spent $17,000 so “motivational artist” Erik Wahl could paint pictures of Michael Jordan and Bono. Meanwhile, America devolves from constitutional republic to banana republic. Federal abuse of power, spying on journalists, politically discriminatory tax agents, and official impunity thrive beneath a tropical canopy of incompetence and economic stagnation. America is becoming Venezuela with atomic weapons. Thanks to the high stakes of the Cold War, the clench-jawed relentlessness of the Greatest Generation, or perhaps some other factor(s), America once exuded gravity. That largely has floated away. As common sense evaporates, for instance, Petrona Smith told her Bronx Spanish students that “black” in that language is “negro.” Some took offense, and she got fired. Now, she is suing for damages. Tracey Hannema, a Manhattan dyslexic, is suing for 50 percent more time so she can take a medical-school admissions test in a quiet, distraction-free environment where she says she could boost her score. Will she also demand such tranquility in a hospital emergency room? Instead of an Apollo-style celebration of achievement and individual excellence, standards slide. NBC News recently profiled Oregon’s South Medford High School and its 21 valedictorians. At Alabama’s Enterprise High, 34 students are “first in their class.” It’s important not to over-romanticize this picture. The best and the brightest who built the Saturn V also authored the food stamp program that burgeons today. Medicaid barely wobbles along, 48 years after its creation. And Washington shipped some 2.6 million GIs to Vietnam. Some 58,000 returned in body bags. Still, there is something truly inspiring even now about the words with which President John F. Kennedy launched the Apollo program in September 1962: “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” Imagine a president of the United States challenging the American people this way. These days, in a nation perpetually on break, it would seem almost rude. Houston, we have a problem. Deroy Murdock is a Fox News contributor, a Scripps Howard News Service syndicated columnist and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Coupons

Cutting Carnage — Changes overdue along Dallas Highway
Jun 19, 2013 | 0 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In a county traversed by three major interstate highways where average speeds often seem to hit the 90 mph mark, one of the most dangerous stretches of road in recent years has, improbably, been the segment of Dallas Highway between Old Hamilton and Bob Cox roads in front of the Avenue West Cobb shopping center. An average of nine accidents a year have taken place at the entrance to The Avenue since 2009, including a fatality on May 15. Another fatal accident took place at the Dallas Highway intersection with Old Hamilton/Casteel roads in 2011, with a third fatal accident taking place that year at the Dallas Highway/West Sandtown Road intersection a half mile to the east. According to Cobb Commission Chairman Tim Lee, there is not enough distance for drivers on Dallas Highway who are turning into the Avenue mall to see oncoming eastbound traffic on the highway. And a similar condition exists at the Dallas Highway/Old Hamilton/Casteel intersection near the western entrance to the mall. The county now has changed the two traffic lights so that as of last week, westbound drivers turning left are only able to do so when eastbound traffic has come to a full stop. “Like any issue like that, it will increase congestion, but the improved safety outweighed the increased congestion that may occur at that intersection,” Lee said. The cost to taxpayers is about $5,000 per intersection — a pittance, especially when one considers the potential savings in lives and property damage. Other changes are afoot as well. The state Department of Transportation is planning to extend the left-turn lanes at The Avenue, which will create more “storage” space for cars waiting to make that turn. And the county is hoping to persuade the state to approve a similar alteration to the traffic light at the Dallas Highway/Bob Cox Road intersection, where eastbound travelers hoping to turn onto Bob Cox must also contend with short sight-lines caused by a hill. Equally important, the county wants to lower the speed limit to 45 mph from 55. “We believe a lower speed limit will give drivers more time to see and react to other cars in the area in order to avoid collisions,” county spokesman Bob Quigley said. The county cannot make such changes unilaterally, because Dallas Highway is a state road (S.R. 120). Those changes are overdue, but none the less are welcome. As noted above, they should go far to reduce the carnage to life and property on one of Cobb’s busiest roads.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Woodstock police dog dies of heatstroke
by Michelle Babcock
Jun 19, 2013 | 1464 views | 4 4 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
A Woodstock Police Officer trains with his dog Spartacus. (STAFF/SAMANTHA M. SHAL)
slideshow
A Woodstock police officer is on paid leave and an investigation is underway into the death of a 3-year-old police dog that died from heatstroke in his handler’s patrol car Monday night, police say.
 
Woodstock Police Officer Chad Berry is on paid administrative leave pending the results of an internal investigation into the death of his police dog Spartacus, who was found dead by Berry at his residence in Jasper around 9 p.m., according to police reports.
 
The Pickens County Sheriff’s Office went to Berry’s house in Jasper when they received a report of the dog’s death from the owner and are conducting their own investigation into the incident, a spokesman said. 
 
Pickens Sheriff’s spokesperson Kris Stancil said that it’s possible the police dog was in Berry’s patrol car for about six hours from 3 to 9 p.m.
 
Stancil said there could be charges made against the officer for animal cruelty if investigators determine there was intentional neglect or cruelty involved, but said it’s too early in the investigation to know.
 
Woodstock Police said a memorial service will be announced for Spartacus in the future, and said the handler is “devastated by the loss.”
 
“We are committed to the care and proper treatment of our working K-9s,” said Woodstock Police spokesperson Brittany Duncan. “We are mourning the loss of one of our own.”
 
Berry has handled police dogs for nine years and his first police dog, who is retired, now lives with his family. Spartacus was a Belgian Malinois and worked in narcotics detection, tracking, and apprehension. 
 
The investigation is expected to be wrapped up later this week, Stancil said.
 
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Witchataw
|
8 Hours Ago
This is a really sad situation. I really feel bad for all involved.
IceDogg
|
12 Hours Ago
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. When a civilian does the same thing, they are charged with felony animal cruelty. And isn't the K9 considered a police officer? That should be even worse than neglectfully killing a "civilian dog". We'll see how the police treat (or give special treatment to) their own.

I have my suspicions that this is the last we'll hear of this though. They'll just sweep it under the carpet.
A Taxpayer
|
12 Hours Ago
The guy who killed this dog was a 9-year veteran of the police force?? Release the name of that idiot !! What a negligent fool
Just Wait
|
12 Hours Ago
I certainly hope this was a tragic accident. If not, the officer should be prosecuted. Things like this just should not happen.
Nunn-Lugar’s reprieve aids global security
by Martin Schram
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 595 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Little noticed amid the U.S.-Russian disagreement over Syria’s civil war, Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin reached a last-minute agreement Monday that may prove more vital to long-term global security. They salvaged the historic Nunn-Lugar threat reduction program that has been keeping us safe by keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of would-be terrorists. For months, a proud and resolute Putin had seemed willing to let the program expire this month. Indeed, it was Obama who announced the agreement in their joint news briefing. Putin, who spoke first, didn’t mention it. The two leaders met for two hours in Northern Ireland at the annual summit of the Group of 8 industrialized nations. At issue: the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, more widely known by the names of the two former U.S. senators — Sam Nunn, D-Ga., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind. — who sponsored it two decades ago. After the Soviet Union collapsed, Nunn and Lugar concluded its weapons of mass destruction were poorly secured and vulnerable to theft. The Nunn-Lugar program has funded the safeguarding and often the dismantling and destroying of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons around the world. Eventually, Nunn and Lugar worked to extend the program’s reach to other nations. So far, for about $500 million a year, Nunn-Lugar has: deactivated more than 7,600 nuclear warheads; destroyed 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles; destroyed 33 submarines capable of launching missiles; removed nuclear weapons from Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus; destroyed 2,900 metric tons of Russian and Albanian chemical weapons agents. But last autumn, Putin began an aggressive effort to show the world Russia no longer needed or wanted to receive international aid. He expelled workers for the U.S. Agency for International Development, UNICEF and various nongovernmental organizations. Russia then announced it would not extend the Nunn-Lugar program. Russia said it wanted to secure its weapons arsenals, but didn’t need foreign aid to do it. Also, Russia was concerned about sharing nuclear security information. Putin said any future cooperative program would require a new, unspecified framework. Yet U.S. sources said that inside the Russian government, key atomic energy officials had strongly urged a continuation of the Nunn-Lugar effort. On Monday, Putin sat silently, staring straight ahead as Obama announced, “We’ll be signing here the continuation of the cooperation that was first established through the Nunn-Lugar program to counter potential threats of proliferation and to enhance nuclear security.” Obama chose his words carefully, because the program that is being extended with Russia will not have a number of the provisions of the original Nunn-Lugar program. Chemical and biological weapons will no longer be in the program, officials said, and the extensive defense cooperation will be vastly reduced. Still, Nunn told me he was pleased by the extension — which he looks at as a new starting point. “Overall, I’m very positive on it,” Nunn said. “But this has to be built on.” Nunn said a number of influential Russians remain concerned about the need to safeguard chemical and biological weapons. He added that cybersecurity safeguards need to be included in the new framework. Meanwhile, Nunn has been looking at a new generation of questions that go far beyond just an extension of his Nunn-Lugar safeguards and the comparatively minor squabbles that occupied Obama and Putin Monday. For the past two years, Nunn has worked with former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov and more than two dozen military, security and political experts from the United States, Russia and Europe on a report titled “Building Mutual Security in the Euro-Atlantic Region.” The report cuts through the usual geopolitical blather and warns: “The blunt truth is that security policies in the Euro-Atlantic region remain largely on Cold War autopilot: large strategic nuclear forces are ready to be launched in minutes; thousands of tactical nuclear weapons remain in Europe; a decades-old missile defense debate remains stuck in neutral; and new security challenges associated with prompt-strike forces, cybersecurity, and space remain contentious and inadequately addressed. This legacy contributes to tensions and mistrust across the Euro-Atlantic region and needlessly drives up the risks and costs of national defense at a time of unprecedented austerity and tight national budgets.” That should convince our leaders to focus on the tomorrow they are creating today by their every action — and mainly, inaction. Martin Schram writes political analysis for Scripps Howard News Service.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Georgia senators should vote ‘no’ on final cloture
by D.A. King
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 128 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, the Democrat President of the U.S. Senate, is apparently getting uncomfortable about the amnesty bill’s polling results. As this is written Wednesday morning, it looked like Reid would call for a final floor vote sometime very soon. He said he might keep the Senate working all weekend. Why? Speed and timing are important to all hustles. In simple terms, the deal is this: The Democrats will pretend they would actually plan do something to secure American borders and some of the Republicans will ignore 1986 and pretend that legalizing immigration crime will somehow prevent more illegal activity. And that they will win the White House in 2016 as a result. And that we can solve our unemployment crisis by importing millions of additional foreign workers. The more the pro-enforcement Americans learn about what National Review correctly calls “Rubio’s Folly,” the more pressure they are putting on their senators to put the entire 1,000 pages into a shredder. The “Vote no!” calls and emails are now flooding into Senate offices. To deter possible senatorial trickery, it is important to understand how the Senate voting procedure works. Before the body begins debate on any bill, it must vote to pass a “motion to proceed.” That has been done and required 60 votes. Then, to end debate, a motion called “final cloture” must also collect at least 60 votes. Only then can a final floor vote occur in which a simple majority can pass the bill (for the Obama-voter readers: there are 100 Senate seats, making 51 a majority). Why is this notable? Because in this system, senators who want to help a bill pass, but don’t want their fingerprints on it, can vote “yes” on final cloture, thereby allowing 51 of their colleagues to vote “yes” on the actual legislation. While they then vote “no.” “Yes” on final cloture and “no” on the actual legislation is how Georgia’s Senator Johnny Isakson voted on the unrelated gun bill earlier this year. National Review also quantifies the replacement worker figures in the bill with this comparison: “the 2007 Bush-Kennedy proposal was rejected in part because it would have added 125,000 new guest workers. The Gang of Eight bill would add 1.6 million in the first year, and about 600,000 a year after that: That’s the population of Philadelphia in year one and the population of Boston each year after” the conservative editors warned this week. That is in addition to the 33 million permanent immigrants the Obama-directed legislation would help add to the U.S. population in the next 10 years. You read that correctly — “Obama-directed.” A senior White House official recently told the New Yorker magazine that “no decisions are being made without talking to us about it ... this does not fly if we’re not O.K. with it.” Example of something that “does not fly?” for Obama? Try this: On Tuesday, the Senate considered two amendments that would have required the federal government to enforce security laws already in place before granting the illegal aliens another amnesty. One, from Sen. John Thune (R- S.D.), required the federal government to complete 350 miles of reinforced, double-layered fencing along the southwest border with Mexico before illegal aliens could be legalized. The amendment would have also required another 350 miles of fencing to be constructed before they could obtain green cards. The fencing requirement was already mandated in the Secure Fence Act of 2006. The amendment failed 39-to-54. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who claims to support a border fence, voted “no” along with the Gang of Eight Republicans. Another amendment, from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), would have required the federal government to complete the biometric entry/exit system at all ports of entry — including land crossings — before amnesty. Congress already mandated such a system in 1996. And five times since. Including in 2002, following the horror of 9/11. At least six of the 9/11 terrorists overstayed their visas. The amendment failed 36-to-58. “I-wanna-be-president” Marco Rubio said just last week that the tracking system was the “lynchpin to the whole bill.” In May, he told several news outlets he supported such a monitoring system. On Tuesday, however, along with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Obama Democrats, Rubio voted against the visa tracking amendment. Got that? Please direct all “does anybody remember 1986 or 9/11 or the American worker?” questions to both of Georgia’s Republican Senators. They should vote “no” on allowing a final floor vote. D.A. King is president of the Cobb-based Dustin Inman Society and a nationally recognized authority on immigration. He is not a member of any political party.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
It’s time to revive America’s can-do spirit
by Deroy Murdock
Columnist
Jun 19, 2013 | 63 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I recently toured the Johnson Space Center here, while vacationing with my retired, itinerant, sainted parents. The most striking thing at NASA’s legendary facility is a Saturn V rocket. It lies within a giant hangar, beneath incredibly bright lights. It is humongous and breathtaking. In large red letters, the words UNITED STATES appear proudly along the vehicle’s length. It brought tears to my eyes. I thought: This is what America did, back when America did things. Today, America has that no-can-do spirit. The U.S. now wheezes beneath the crushing weight of lawsuits, environmental impact reports, diversity consultants, a $17 trillion national debt, entitlement proliferation, lethargic economic growth, the lowest labor-participation rate since 1979, relentless Twitter distractions, and the mind-dissolving effects of Kardashianization. When another Saturn V sent Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the moon in July 1969, America was a serious country. Forty-four summers hence, not so much. U.S. astronauts headed for the International Space Station now must hitchhike there on Russia’s rockets. Fare: $70.6 million per seat. Beyond America’s downshift in space, innovation seems stuck in a lower gear. When did a new invention make you slap your head in astonishment, as was routine for decades? Smartphones do grow smarter. Aside from that. ... Yes, the Saturn V was a product of big government — but not as big then as today. When Armstrong took “one small step for man,” Washington, D.C., spent 19.3 percent of gross domestic product. By 2011, its share was 24.5 percent. Besides, big government used the Saturn V to accomplish “one giant leap for mankind,” as Armstrong declared. Here on Earth, that mission catapulted America well ahead of the Marxist Soviet Union. Compare that to big government today: $787 billion squandered on a stimulus that stimulated nothing; green jobs that, at best, cost $575,000 each, and an entitlement state that expands as poverty grows. On a smaller but also irritating scale, conference-going IRS employees have occupied $3,500-per-night hotel rooms. The tax agency also spent $17,000 so “motivational artist” Erik Wahl could paint pictures of Michael Jordan and Bono. Meanwhile, America devolves from constitutional republic to banana republic. Federal abuse of power, spying on journalists, politically discriminatory tax agents, and official impunity thrive beneath a tropical canopy of incompetence and economic stagnation. America is becoming Venezuela with atomic weapons. Thanks to the high stakes of the Cold War, the clench-jawed relentlessness of the Greatest Generation, or perhaps some other factor(s), America once exuded gravity. That largely has floated away. As common sense evaporates, for instance, Petrona Smith told her Bronx Spanish students that “black” in that language is “negro.” Some took offense, and she got fired. Now, she is suing for damages. Tracey Hannema, a Manhattan dyslexic, is suing for 50 percent more time so she can take a medical-school admissions test in a quiet, distraction-free environment where she says she could boost her score. Will she also demand such tranquility in a hospital emergency room? Instead of an Apollo-style celebration of achievement and individual excellence, standards slide. NBC News recently profiled Oregon’s South Medford High School and its 21 valedictorians. At Alabama’s Enterprise High, 34 students are “first in their class.” It’s important not to over-romanticize this picture. The best and the brightest who built the Saturn V also authored the food stamp program that burgeons today. Medicaid barely wobbles along, 48 years after its creation. And Washington shipped some 2.6 million GIs to Vietnam. Some 58,000 returned in body bags. Still, there is something truly inspiring even now about the words with which President John F. Kennedy launched the Apollo program in September 1962: “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.” Imagine a president of the United States challenging the American people this way. These days, in a nation perpetually on break, it would seem almost rude. Houston, we have a problem. Deroy Murdock is a Fox News contributor, a Scripps Howard News Service syndicated columnist and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet