The Canterbury Tales and Contemporary Politics
by Barbara_Donnelly_Lane
 Politics
May 14, 2012 09:23 AM | 2831 views | 5 5 comments | 21 21 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

My son and I recently went to see a modern adaptation of Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales at the Shakespeare Tavern in Atlanta. This classic work of British literature sparkles with wit as it offers keen insight into the ageless nature of mankind.

After all, while just a commoner, the “father of English poetry” served two kings as a diplomat. As such, he became well versed in the art of discerning the true intent of the human heart.

From what we understand of him, Chaucer was never beguiled by pleasant words or high station. In fact, he used his pen to point out some of the absurdities of his own time, couching scathing criticism for both church and state within his fiction.

Understanding this, I watched with extra interest the retelling of those stories we all read in high school that were staged in a twenty-first century context: the Wife of Bath with a Gucci purse, the Miller coming across as a loud-mouthed football fan, and the Pardoner in his salesman’s suit.

Though it lost some of the nuance found in the original stories--some of the complexity of the ideas explored as well as the intricacies of the prose text--the production did something for me that it surely would have done for Chaucer’s audience in the Middle Ages. It made me think immediately of politics.

For example, naughty but smart, the Wife of Bath is portrayed as using her best assets to assert dominion over her own fate in a time when women had little power and garnered less respect from society.

The recent comments by Hillary Rosen that caused such a broo-ha-ha about the role of women raising children today—their right to voice their opinions on broader issues than child rearing—made me wonder how far the fairer sex has really moved towards not being judged for personal choices… towards having real sovereignty over their own existence.

The Miller with his coarse behavior and lewd story is the blue-collar worker who enjoys a beer on a weekend and laughs at the rest of the world with hearty approbation.

Yet the Miller is too loud for the Reeve who wishes to tear him down with a tale bent on destroying the very thought of him, just as political correctness scorns those men who inhabit the heartland as ignorant and uncultured: a group of people only to be tolerated for inhabiting a sizable voting block as members of labor unions.

Then there is the Pardoner.

In The Canterbury Tales, this is the character most reviled by Chaucer. While his tale is, perhaps, the most polished, the one with the best moral, the parable that one remembers as well as any lauded populist’s stump speech, he is shown in the frame tale as the master manipulator that he is, the snake-oil salesman who pretends to ply his wares in the interest of others while only concerned about himself. He says that greed is bad, which it is, but then he uses guilt and fear for his own profit.

Can we guess which slick talking politician of today who focuses on class warfare, the peddling of ineffective policies, and the power of demagoguery for political points that the Pardoner called directly to my mind?

Well, let me give you a clue. It wasn’t Mitt Romney.

Yes, The Canterbury Tales is a valuable work of art with universal themes that remain timeless and worthy of exploration.

It is good to take lessons from literature.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
B. D. Lane
|
May 18, 2012
Having a person assume that earning two English degrees may mean I've never studied Chaucer closely might be understandable. After all, I have only attended state universities. But assuming I chose the underscoring in my name??? Downright scurrilous, friend! ;) I chose nary a hyphen!

As for my friend the Pardoner...

And thus with feyned flaterye and japes,

He made the person and the peple his apes...

(I'm sure my learned critic can handle Middle English.)

The analogy stands because the President and the Pardoner both sell a false salvation to enhance their own interests. In other words, as societal division and Buffet rules have about as much power to solve the problems that threaten to throw our little country into the abyss, the Pardoner's pig's bones and metal cross are but false relics.

Of course, this IS, as Mister Bill says, too easy. But I thank you very much for reading my thoughts and considering my ideas on their merit before attacking me as illiterate.

AND I am glad that you have read Chaucer. He is rather good.

Lit Lessons
|
May 17, 2012
I only went to school in Georgia, but it seems to me Honeytree does not know how to recognize an analogy.
Heaventree
|
May 17, 2012
Actually, the Pardoner should most put you in mind of your MDJ confrere, "Dr." Nelson Price. The Pardoner is a religious charlatan, peddling lies to the suckers for his own profit.

It stands to reason, of course, that Barbara_Donnelly_Lane (the underscoring must be a legal component of her name) knows Chaucer not from reading him but from seeing a stage adaptation of the Tales. Barbara_Donnelly_Lane's actual reading skills, to judge from the quality of her contributions to the Marietta Daily Journal, must be quite painfully limited.
Eng. Major
|
May 14, 2012
This sounds like you had fun, and I wish students could see The Canterbury Tales presented in this way. They would appreciate them more. I also liked the way you made the connection with modern politics. Good job!
misterbill
|
May 14, 2012
B-D-L

No fair. Too easy.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides