The T-SPLOST - Some last thoughts on its importance
by F.T. Davis
Columnist
July 28, 2012 11:05 PM | 1073 views | 7 7 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
By now you and I have heard all of the arguments. Tuesday we will have the chance to settle the question for our generation, probably.

There has been a lot of grandstanding on all sides. The proposed improvements to our regional transportation system will not cure all traffic jams or permit you or me to ride in our single passenger auto at warp speed from Marietta to the airport for that flight at rush hour.

By the same token, no matter how loudly “no tax” voices shout, we, the citizens of our region, will wind up paying for any transportation we use. We can pay for it, and spend it, close to home (via the TSPLOST) or we can funnel those funds through the state or federal government and hope that 80 percent or 90 percent will come back, for some project which the state or Washington approves.

Worse, without the TSPLOST, our region will not be able to “match” many funds otherwise available from the federal government for our regional transportation projects.

The current vote is for a specific list of transportation projects, specifically for our region, to be started within a specific time window, and with a much more transparent and accountable system than we have by sending our funds to the state legislature or Congress and hoping that we will get some back for some project, some time. Interestingly, every major project to be paid for by the TSPLOST has been in plans made public, discussed in numerous public meetings, debated, and approved overwhelmingly by our representatives over many years. They were in the Regional Transportation Plans approved on the watches of Chairmen Tim Lee, Sam Olens, Bill Byrne and some of them, all the way back to Chairman Ernest Barrett. The difference this time is they actually will be built in the next decade or so if we approve the TSPLOST.

As the Wall Street Journal noted in an article on our regional referendum earlier this month, some conservative groups claim there is too “heavy an emphasis on public transit” in the project list, while the Sierra Club and the NAACP “complain there isn’t enough transit.” I figure that means our representatives must have gotten it about right, because we do need both road improvements and better transit in our region. We need to give more of our citizens more choices in transportation.

Here are some facts that often get lost in the rancor and shouting. Take a look at the chart nearby from a respected conservative think tank, the Cato Institute, “Policy Analysis: Ending Congestion by Refinancing Highways”:

It shows that if we can gradually create some alternate means of transportation in Cobb and our region at peak travel periods, the result could be a big, positive, “multiplier effect” in speeding up travel. In other words, I-75 works fine so long as there are only, say, 1,400 vehicles in each lane, each hour. Once we add extra vehicles (because we do not have some other way for the folks in those vehicles to travel) not only does traffic slow to a crawl (as we all know by bitter experience), but the snarl lasts for a long time after the actual peak.

Groucho Marx had a routine in which he said “Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” The folks urging us to vote down TSPLOST say something better will come along (never mind that they don’t know what that is, or when). Maybe they want us to believe everything is great in our transportation system right now. In any event, they want us to believe them rather than our own eyes.

A great regional transportation system right now is not what I see. It’s not what businesses deciding to locate in Charlotte or Dallas instead of here see. Without a regional approach, regional projects and regional funding, it’s hard to believe we are going to have anything other than what we have had for the past 20 years — more congestion, more and worse traffic jams, and jobs drifting off to other regions. Jobs will locate in places which demonstrate in some concrete way that they are at least willing to start to build a 21st century transportation system.

It’s not perfect, but it’s the best chance we will have for a long time. Please consider voting “for” the TSPLOST.

F.T. Davis, Jr. is a life-long regional resident and long-time member of the Atlanta Regional Commission and its Transportation and Air Quality Committee. He has been on the MDJ’s board of directors for over 30 years.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
SG68
|
July 30, 2012
I truly hope these ARE your "last thoughts" on this TSPLOST issue because all of your thoughts up to and including these have been pretty lame.

Actually I would characterize them more along the lines of "Brain F_rts" than I would meaningful well reasoned, fact based contributions to the continuing debate on this issue.
anonymous
|
July 30, 2012
FT Davis, go blow your smoke in Buckhead, please. We're really tired of the BS you ARC and Chamber thugs are spewing these days.
No, no, no, no.
|
July 29, 2012
Same old tired lines, Mr. Davis. Your argument is miserably weak. You would have been better off getting some additional sleep than spending time on this collection of conjecture.

Seriously, handing over $7 billion of our money just to keep the developer/politician syndicate happy with photo-ops and fancy parties, is just plain wrong. And with several billion of this total going to bail out MARTA, temporarily saving them from their own incompetence, the errors of this tax plan are simply too big to even consider passing.

By the way, how does spending billions on 19th century rail technology have anything whatsoever to do with a 21st century transportation system, especially when the network is going to be run by bureaucrats that are happy if they recover just 20% of their costs. This level of lousy management and tax allocation must be stopped and stopped cold.

No, Mr. Davis, I will NOT vote for this abominable amalgamation of nonsense. And neither should you.
TIC
|
July 29, 2012
Groucho Marx had a routine in which he said “Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?”

Exactly Mr. Davis. who are we going to believe?

The rabid TSPLOST supporters like you who are feeding us lie after lie about what this TSPLOST will supposedly accomplish and who it will supposedly benefit

or

our own eyes and common sense that indicate that the same unscroupulous power brokers and bumbling government agencies that got us into this situation are going to suddenly and magically change into Solomon like benefactors and efficient, effective bureacracies that will actually be able to get something done.

The first big hint that this whole TSPLOST initiative was off track was the disastrous project list that was put together.

You claim it is not perfect. No Kidding?

Well not only is it not perfect, it does little to address our regional transportation issues.

The AJC, the Citizens for Transportation Mobility and other pro TSPLOST zealots constantly point to Atlanta's proud historical record of stepping up to the plate when faced with seminal challenges to our city.

Well that's true, but in the past we were lead by individuals who lived in Atlanta and loved this City. They were sincere and had the best interest of the city at heart.

Now we are being hoodwinked by a bunch of modern day carpetbaggers and inner city gangstas who only want our tax dollars to fatten their own personal bank accounts or promote their self serving political aspirations.

And you, Mr. Davis, have obviously sided with them instead of doing what is best for our city and region.

We can do much better than this and should step back and take the opportunity to improve the project list.

Once this step is taken we will have committed to the wrong direction and likely will have doomed our city for decades to come.

As for me

I choose to believe my own eyes and judgement and not be taken in by what I am being asked to blindly believe.



Mike Straus
|
July 29, 2012
While not perfect it is a beginning and will show companies considing relocation to the Sunbelt that Atlanta is working on a regional solution for the 21st Century. The ultra conservatives against it say the projects are wrong or too costly and that we can have a new plan to vote on in 2 years without any real specifics. From my experience, it is always easier to say something is wrong with a program designed by others than to design one that everyone will be happy with. I feel that if we vote this down no, the same thing will happen in 2 years for there is never a perfect answer.
anonymous
|
July 30, 2012
The NAACP is against the tax, as is the Sierra Club, as are several urban Democrat legislators.

I've never heard of these groups described as "ultra conservatives" before.

Vote No - wrong tax, wrong time, wrong project list, wrong oversite mechanism.
SG68
|
July 30, 2012
But in two years at least all of the alternatives will have been thoroughly discussed and reviewed.

We already have a good start on establishing a realistic new project list.

The first step is to eliminate about 150 of the 157 projects on the current list and go from there.

Start with the Atlanta "goes nowhere" Beltline Trolley
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides