Spending Cuts: Obama proving he’s all talk, no action
March 10, 2013 12:00 AM | 3272 views | 2 2 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The “Washington Monument” strategy is in full swing as President Obama tries — thus far without success — to persuade the public that Republicans are most to blame for the Sequester strategy he implemented. His clear goal is to hope the public and mainstream media put so much pressure on House Republicans that they cave into his demand for new taxes rather than continue with the comparatively scant Sequester-driven budget cuts. And his idea of how best to demonstrate the “seriousness” of the Sequester cuts is not by first cutting any of the oodles of waste in the federal budget, but by shutting down vital services right off the bat.

Case in point: the Federal Aviation Administration’s announcement last week that as of April 7 it would no longer fund on-site airport traffic controllers at non-airline airports. Among the airports affected would be Cobb County McCollum Field just outside Kennesaw, which despite its comparative low profile is annually one of Georgia’s five busiest airports. Why worry about safety when there are political points the president thinks he can make?

However, he’s finding out that door swings both ways. While Obama and his Capitol Hill allies talk about how the Sequester will mean job cuts for teachers and firefighters (who typically are paid with local funding, not federal, which he apparently doesn’t know), the president’s critics have been quick to publicize some of the federal spending he could be cutting, but isn’t.

Things like the three White House calligraphers, who together earn almost $277,000 per year. Or the Environmental Protection Agency’s $141,000 spent on a Chinese study of swine manure. Yes, swine manure.

And as long as we’re talking about four-legged critters, how about the National Science Foundation’s $325,000 funding for construction of a robotic squirrel?

Let’s not overlook the White House failure to cut a dime from its $27 million project to help fund pottery classes in Morocco.

And as the Wall Street Journal reported late last week, “The government gave a $3,700 grant to build a miniature street in West Virginia — out of Legos. It shelled out $500,000 to support specialty shampoo products for cats and dogs. A San Diego outfit got $10,000 for trolley dancing. The feds last year held 894 conferences that each cost more than $100,000 — $340 million altogether.”

Yet, in a PR stunt that quickly backfired, Obama announced that he was cancelling tours of the White House because of the Sequester cuts, saving about $18,000 a week, which as Forbes magazine noted was the rough equivalent of the cost of keeping Air Force One in the air for two hours.

President Obama has argued, in so many words, that the only good government is big government, and the bigger it is, the better. He has an insatiable desire for new taxes to feed that bureaucracy, and while he is fine with taking an axe to Defense, it’s more apparent than ever that when it comes to any sort of meaningful spending cuts, he’s all talk, no action.

The American people deserve better.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
March 11, 2013
If the government would stop sending our tax money to every other country that has their hand out there would be no budget problem.

Why are we sending funds to countries that hate us?

Why does Obama have a dog walker and why does his wife have a huge staff, because the idiots in Congress are to stupid to put their foot down.

Look at the budget they are fighting over and see how much you can cut from it without much of an effort.
March 14, 2013
Well who do you want to pay to take the dog outside, all of Obama's secret service detail so an Obama family member can walk the dog, or a single dog walker? Or is it that only administrations with a Bush should be allowed to have dogs?

Why does Ms Obama have a huge staff? How huge is it? Is it any bigger than Laura's or Grandma Bush's or Nancy's or Hillary's or Rosalynn's or Betty's or Patty's or Lady Bird's or Jackie's etc etc etc? Should the First Lady sit at home making pies?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides