Residents already turn up their noses at latest expansion discussions for trash transfer site
by Jon Gillooly and Geoff Folsom
February 03, 2013 12:48 AM | 3731 views | 8 8 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Robin Meyer of the Mableton Improvement Coalition stands next to a zoning notice outside the entrance to the Bankhead C&D Transfer station.<br>Staff/Todd Hull
Robin Meyer of the Mableton Improvement Coalition stands next to a zoning notice outside the entrance to the Bankhead C&D Transfer station.
Staff/Todd Hull

MABLETON — An abrupt change of position by the Georgia Department of Transportation could resurrect a controversial south Cobb trash site’s plans for expansion. That leaves nearby residents, who celebrated a victory one year ago when county commissioners unanimously voted the project down, with a foul odor in their nostrils. They fear that some back-room deals may have quietly put the project back on the fast track to approval. At issue is an existing transfer station that takes in construction and demolition waste but wants to expand and start accepting household garbage. County leaders met with residents

Thursday to discuss a tentative settlement agreement on a lawsuit brought by owners of the Bankhead C&D Transfer Station. A decision is expected at the Cobb Board of Commissioners meeting on Feb. 19.

“There’s still a lot of questions to be answered,” said southwest Cobb Commissioner Lisa Cupid, who represents the area that includes the transfer station.

Cupid, who took office in January, is catching up on many of the details of the proposed settlement before she can decide whether she wants to support it.

The tentative settlement offer arose after a Dec. 14 mediation with retired Georgia Supreme Court Justice Conley Ingram.

In May 2012, the Cobb Board of Commissioners denied a request by Bankhead C&D transfer station on Veteran’s Memorial Highway near Discover Boulevard, for a permit to expand operations on its 8.1-acre site. After the Cobb Planning Commission recommended approval for the permit, a GDOT report advised that birds attracted to garbage could pose a threat to planes taking off and landing at Fulton County Charlie Brown airport, located just across the Chattahoochee River in Fulton County.

“From what I’m told, birds and airplanes don’t mix,” said Rob Hosack, the county’s community development director. Hosack’s staff changed its recommendation on the transfer station expansion to denial after the GDOT report.

But GDOT has now reversed its earlier decision. Agency spokesman David Spear said the initial recommendation came from a misinterpretation of the transfer station. He said GDOT officials initially thought the proposed garbage transfer station violated Federal Aviation Administration guidelines because it would be next to a commercial and demolition landfill. But a December letter from Bankhead attorney Garvis Sams to GDOT Deputy Commissioner Todd Long pointed out that the commercial and demolition site is only for waste transfer and not disposal, asking the agency to take another look.

“We’re not solid waste experts,” Spear said when asked why GDOT wasn’t aware of the status of the transfer station, adding the caveat, “actually I used to work in the solid waste business, so I could have told them that.”

Hosack compared the waste transfer station, which is now licensed to take in material such as wood, bricks and concrete, to the county-owned facility on County Services Parkway.

“It’s a building where people bring stuff, drop it off and then bigger trucks come and pick it up and take it off site to a landfill,” he said.

After commissioners denied the request, Bankhead owners sued the county in Cobb Superior Court. Hosack said the proposed settlement includes a system designed to contain the smell of the garbage.

“It’s a lot of the same stuff they offered when the board initially turned it down,” Hosack said.

Residents decry secrecy

Area resident Shelia Edwards, director of Legacy Cares, a group formed to fight the transfer station’s expansion, said she doesn’t understand why GDOT would change its decision based solely on conversations with Bankhead’s attorney. She figures someone in the county must have asked them to do it.

“This really wasn’t GDOT’s fight to fight,” Edwards said.

Spear said he doesn’t know of GDOT hearing from anyone other than Bankhead’s attorney in advising the agency to take up the issue again.

Cupid said she doesn’t know if anyone with the county discussed the matter with GDOT officials.

“That’s the magic question,” she said. “That’s what I think has incensed some of the residents.”

Edwards said no one from the area around the transfer station was invited to take part in the mediation. She found out about it after a Mableton Improvement Coalition member drove by and saw a sign advertising the upcoming Board of Commissioner’s zoning vote.

“I don’t know if it was a conscious decision to keep us in the dark,” she said. “Sitting back, we’re asking that question.”

Before the commission vote last spring, Edwards helped rally community support against the transfer station’s expansion, bringing 42 people in opposition to the Board of Commissioners’ meeting.

The transfer station, which looks to take in 150,000 tons of garbage a year, was fined by the county in January 2011 and March 2012 after taking in household trash. Though Bankhead received a permit from the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to take in garbage in 2010, it did not get approval from the county.

“The trash was simply dumped on the ground, and they take a front-end loader and push it around,” said Mableton Improvement Coalition Vice President Robin Meyer, another opponent of the transfer station’s expansion.

Meyer said Bankhead and the county have tried to explain the site as isolated from homes and businesses. But she said it is too close to upscale subdivisions and planned development on the river.

“It is within 1,000 feet of homes, within 2,000 feet of the Chattahoochee River,” she said. “It is next door to a restaurant, it has a historic cemetery basically on its property … It’s sad, very sad.”

Sams, the attorney for Bankhead, declined comment. But in a Jan. 17 letter to assistant County Attorney Joseph Atkins, he said the proposed settlement includes stipulations that the enclosed facility would include an odor suppression system with exhaust fans and overhead misters to keep dust from spreading.

But Edwards was still concerned because Bankhead plans to have 48 truck trips to and from the property each day.

“Those doors will be open every 15 minutes,” she said. “How will they ever contain the smell?”
Comments-icon Post a Comment
February 11, 2013
To any commissioner who votes for this landfill...I hope you enjoyed your job. I will personally make sure that myself and everyone in my community votes you out of office. This pun intended. Just as the area is starting to attract nice homes and residents they want to destroy it? The fact that they would even consider this is pathetic. Buh bye!
terry milliner
February 09, 2013
I am completely opposed to the transfer station expansion into our community. I have lived here in Mableton for nearly 16 years and I had seen this area improving by leaps and bounds. This is action would be a huge step in the opposite direction for our community. Vote it down!!!
J Jerral
February 09, 2013
The total lack of care to the consequences of their actions is unacceptable! They have a master plan to improve the area and to do business as usual, they throw it in the TRASH.

It is definetly sad to see the total lack of care from some of our commissioners. I hope they see that the community is not going to go away and we are going to fight to retain the quality of life the elected officials sold us.

Although, I do appreciate that at least the new commissioner, Ms. Cupid is willing to listen, and hopefully the rest of the commissioners are realizing that the community has changed and we will have our voice heard, with letter, meeting attendance, and voting.

Sergio H.
February 07, 2013
What a disheartening feeling to see this type of back-door politics being played on such an important topic that impacts our Community. This corridor of Mableton, but specifically of Veterans Memorial has been looking to revitalize with new homes and business over the last 8 years. The importance of this revitalization not only impacts our local community, but also the County which will benefit from property tax revenues and increased standard of living for its citizens. Allowing this landfill to move forward steps away from one of our most prized Georgia Natural Resources, the Chattahoochee River and steps away from so many families is unacceptable. As diverse as Mableton is, we stand together in opposing this landfill.
February 06, 2013
Extremely disappointed to see how the individual interests of a private company seem to prevail over the safety and well being of hundreds of families who live in the surrounding areas to this trash transfer station. I hope our county officials display the courage and ethics to challenge this project and protect our rights as residents.
Sam H.
February 05, 2013
"Here We Go Again"!!! If it isn't " Medical Waste" its neighborhood waste. This same or similar measure was defeated approximately 20 years ago. Why do they always wish to place this kind of thing near waterways or groundwater systems so that we may all come down with some strange or incurable disease.
Adele E.
February 05, 2013
Whether or not they plan to transfer or dump waste next to our neighborhood, waste is waste. It stinks, it attracts birds, rodents, etc., and it just does not belong on Veteran's Memorial Drive so close to retail outfits, restaurants, or the homes of tax paying homeowners. They must be stopped once and for all and cease trying to pull the wool over the eyes of our decision makers.

Please continue covering this story. This is extremely important to our local families and children.
Legacy Cares
February 05, 2013
Thank you for your coverage on the BTS proposed settlement. Your article spotlighted many of our concerns, but there are more. In 2012, BTS was cited with numerous disturbing violations by the EPD including operating an illegal landfill. Here is a quote from the letter to BTS from the EPD:

“Evidence exists on site (at the time of inspection) that solid waste is now or has in recent past been disposed of in ways consistent with a landfill operation and not that of a transfer station.”

All of this has been occurring next door to our community and the protected Chattahoochee River. In the face of these ongoing violations by this company in our community, how can the county now consider awarding these bad behaviors with a “green light” to continue bringing trash into our community and operating a landfill. Did GDOT know of these disturbing EPD violations when they sent Cobb County a "different" letter at the request of the BTS attorney? Did GDOT know that BTS was cited for operating an illegal landfill by their sister state agency, the EPD? Also, why would the county agree to settle this matter when they are in possession of this EPD notice of violations that BTS has been operating an illegal landfill on the property – which is clearly against the FAA rules regarding this matter? Lastly, I know that the focus has been on the FAA rules and birds, but there were a number of other factors that went into the county denying this matter last year – which Commissioner Thompson read into the records for this meeting including the oversaturation of landfills in our community.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides