Representative to push for ‘parent-trigger’ legislation
by Bill Barrow
Associated Press Writer
January 12, 2013 12:16 AM | 765 views | 1 1 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ATLANTA — Many state leaders, including Gov. Nathan Deal and state schools Superintendent John Barge, say they expect — or at least hope for — a relatively quiet legislative session on education issues. But an idea from an Atlanta Republican could upset those plans.

Rep. Edward Lindsey plans to push a bill that would allow parents in a public school to vote whether their campus should be converted into an independent charter school. Lindsey promises that his bill also would allow either parents or teachers to hold referenda on whether a school’s administration should be replaced.

He promised Friday that his initial draft, which he has not yet filed, would leave any final decisions on charters or administrators to local school boards.

The General Assembly convenes Monday for its annual session.

So-called “parent-trigger” bills are the latest front in the burgeoning school-choice movement. Twenty state legislatures have considered the idea, and seven states have adopted some version of the law, with California leading the way in 2010.

The issue is often hotly contested in statehouses, with fierce opposition from teachers associations. Georgia teachers’ groups have already signaled their opposition. The fiercest school-choice advocates, meanwhile, could push to make the votes binding, rather than leave changes up to school boards. That could leave Lindsey in the middle.

A hotly contested fight would come on the heels of last year’s kerfuffle over a constitutional amendment to expand the state’s authority to issue charters to independent school operators. That idea cleared the General Assembly and was enacted with 58 percent support among voters in the November general election.

Speaking at a Friday conference on Georgia education issues, Lindsey said that electoral margin was a message from voters: “The status quo is morally and economically unacceptable.”

At the same time, he framed his trigger bill as a nuanced approach that isn’t intended to replicate last year’s intense fight.

House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, D-Atlanta, wouldn’t dismiss the proposal outright, but expressed concerns. “The ethos is good, which is to increase engagement” from parents, teachers and the community. But, she added, “Charter schools are not a panacea. ... The devil is always in the details.”

And she warned against reading too much into the results of the November charter amendment vote.

Abrams’ caucus, which includes just 60 of the House’s 180 members, often aligns with teachers’ lobby.

Lindsey, whose position as majority whip makes him the No. 4-ranking House Republican, was insistent that school boards should have the final say over the charters or any job action on principals. Asked whether there should be an appeal to the state, Lindsey said no.

Several other states make the parent vote binding.

That detail is an echo of the 2012 charter debate. Charter schools were already allowed in Georgia, but local school boards mostly controlled whether to grant charters for independent schools. The new amendment reaffirms state authority to override local denials and allows certain charter applicants to bypass local officials altogether.

Another provision is more sweeping than in other states: Lindsey wants his plan to apply at all schools. Several states allow the triggers only in schools that are failing to meet certain performance criteria.

Deal has not unveiled his session agenda. Deal and House Speaker David Ralston have said in recent interviews that they want to see recent education changes — the new charter process, curriculum changes, teacher evaluation changes — take full effect before pursuing more overhauls.

That doesn’t mean they would block Lindsey’s proposal, but it could mean that the representative may have to build momentum for the idea without them.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
NEA Teacher
|
January 13, 2013
Why don't they just go ahead and eliminate public schools and the portion of the property tax that funds it. Seems that republicans don't want to pay taxes for anything and want to undue all of the progress the country has made through government social and education programs. Eventually all the cuts will lead us back full circle to spending and creating the programs again. Doesn't anyone read and study history anymore?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides