Primary rules made for old-style voter disenfranchisement
by The Macon Telegraph
August 10, 2012 01:04 AM | 1436 views | 2 2 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The July 31 primary, because of our system of partisan elections, did a disservice to voters. By having to declare either Republican or Democratic party affiliations, voters could not select everyone they may have wanted. For example, the Sheriff’s race was on the Democratic ticket while the Bibb County Commission, District 3 was on the Republican ballot. District 3 voters who might have wanted a say in both races could not. The same thing applied in state Senate districts 18 and 26, one Republican the other Democratic. This process is nonsense and it doesn’t have to be that way.

There are several examples. Louisiana uses a nonpartisan blanket primary where everyone is on the ballot and the top two finishers meet in a runoff election. Some states, such as Nebraska, use a nonpartisan primary for its legislature but not for other offices.

Last year, eight elected officials (Bibb County’s solicitor-general, probate judge, district attorney, sheriff, superior court clerk, civil court judge and tax commissioner) asked for local legislation to make their offices nonpartisan. There is no need for any of those positions to be partisan. The sheriff has to arrest Republicans and Democrats. The tax commissioner doesn’t collect money based on party affiliation, and certainly, judges could care less about party when handing down sentences.

So why do we do it? Why do we have party affiliation attached to the above positions and school board seats? In fact, for local positions is there ever a need to be partisan? We think not.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dustoff
|
August 13, 2012
Local elections should be nonpartisan. You should be able to vote for the person of your choice without having to declare any part affiliation.

Joseph Pond
|
August 10, 2012
People in District 4, Cobb County had the same issue- either vote for Commissioner (Democrat) or vote for Chairman (Republican). Since there is no partisan opposition, the winners of those primaries, or run-offs as the case may be, wins the position. District 4 voters were denied their chance to vote for one or the other. Not really 'One Person, One Vote' is it?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides