Power to the people: Walker win a victory for taxpayers
June 07, 2012 12:00 AM | 1104 views | 15 15 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker withstood a furious recall attempt on Tuesday in an election that was almost certainly the most closely watched electoral contest in the country in the run-up to November. Its stunning outcome, with the pro-union forces suffering a landslide defeat — and in a state with a historic sympathy for “progressive” causes — should give President Obama and his team the shakes.

Walker won, you see, because he represented the taxpayers, not the special interests, like the public-sector employee unions. And he won because he was trying to save money for the taxpayers, not milk them, like the public-sector employee unions.

The recall vote was spurred by Walker’s successful push to limit collective bargaining rights for public-sector unions and require them to contribute slightly more for their health coverage and pensions. He also eliminated unions’ ability to collect dues via payroll deductions (and union memberships have been dropping as a result).

Union members and their supporters went ballistic, occupying the Statehouse and acting like hooligans while Democratic legislators ducked their responsibility and fled the state in hopes of stalling the reforms by preventing a quorum of the Legislature from meeting.

But Walker hung tough and withstood everything the left threw his way.

His reforms paid off, too. They had saved Wisconsin taxpayers an estimated $1 billion already by this month. In fact, they were so successful that they were neutralized as an overt campaign issue to a large extent. Even more remarkably, polls show Walker’s pro-taxpayer reforms were supported by a majority of union members — not public-sector union members, mind you, but those who belong to private-sector unions. Those who like other taxpayers have had to help foot the bills for the public workers’ salaries and cushy benefits.

Walker’s reform proved so popular with so many that his opponents could not even persuade President Obama to throw the weight of his office into the recall fight. Instead, his support was limited to a brief tweet. What courage!

The public-sector unions obviously had a great deal at stake on Tuesday and suffered a crushing defeat. It is hoped that the outcome will embolden other governors to follow in Walker’s footsteps and not shy away from battles on taxpayers’ behalf.
Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
absurdis maximus
|
June 07, 2012
Scott Walker won because he represented his state's taxpayers? Give me a break....Scott Walker received $31M in political contributions to fight the recall -- a full 75% of which of which originated FROM OUT OF STATE DONORS. If that's your version of "power to the people", then you are not into representative democracy. This merely points out the absurd blindness this editorial board has to the fact that governance in this country from both sides of the aisle has simply degraded into a grand game of pay to play.
Unions Lost
|
June 08, 2012
Wisconsin unemployment is down and continues to decrease, taxes across the board have been lowered, business investment is up, Wisconsin's deficit continues to shrink. All the above since Scott Walker took office. The facts speak for themselves. Unions are destroying Detroit, New York state, California, Rhode Island, the list goes on. The people made their choice in Wisconsin, and the voters won. The union elites lost.
spouthernbychoice
|
June 08, 2012
And I am sure you also have the facts and figures on how much the opposition received - like from unions across the country and the DNC, which it seems you conveniently left out of your comment. Would your opinions have beenteh same if Walker had beend efeated. I doubt it very much. You on the left can't stand it when you don't win. You are like petulent little children and use any excuse you can think of - while conveniently missing the truth - the taxpayers are tired of unions and the left killing this country.
br556
|
June 07, 2012
@foley

Your dogma is getting in the way again of reality. It WAS the middle-class that voted against the union elite class. Even Obama saw the futility and did not go near Wisconsin. Try again Foley.
br556
|
June 07, 2012
@wrong

Keep believing that fairly tale about exit polls right up to the November elections when socialist Marxist Obama will be shown to the exit. Exit polls were not accurate, because voters feared harassment from union thugs.
Kevin Foley
|
June 07, 2012
Union buster Walker won because he outspent his opponent 8-1, primarily with out of state money supplied by the Koch bros and other anti-union, anti-middle class, anti-poor billionaires.

You also failed to point out that Walker lost his GOP majority in the Wisconsin senate. The new Democratic majority will make sure he has a tough time pushing through any more of his radical agenda.
TIC
|
June 07, 2012
Your first statement just sounds like sour grapes.

Isn't that how the socialist Obama won the presidential election in 2008?

I'll wager you had no problem with that!!

Your second statement I actually agree with. A balance of power is in most instances a good thing.

In fact, now that I think about it if we had those checks and balances in place in the congress after the 2008 elections we wouldn't have ObamaCare and the worthless stimulus and the bank bailouts and the car company bailouts that have kept our country in a liberal led recession with an 8% unemployment rate.

Accuracy Please
|
June 07, 2012
Mr Foley, you left out many important details. The senate recall is purely symbolic, because the Wisconsin state legislature is out of session until November, at which time 16 of 33 senators will be up for election. You also failed to mention that three of the four Republican senators that the union elites tried to recall survived the recall. The fourth senator recalled has no clear winner, since a recount is underway and heavy Democrat voter fraud is strongly suspected. 700 votes are in question in that race, and thousands of ballots are suspected of being fraudulently cast by Democrat union thugs.

Please try to be accurate next time Mr Foley?
Kevin Foley
|
June 07, 2012
Accuracy - You should check in here more often to set straight all the right wing jive I see.

Who cares if the senate is out until November? The senate recall is every bit as symbolic as Walker's so-called "victory".
southernbychoice
|
June 08, 2012
And I guess the fact that the Kochs' donations are only 7% as much as Soros is irrelevant. And teh fact that obama is preparing an executive order to make contrctors bidding on government jobs disclose to who and how much they donated, and outing donors on a white house web site is also irrelevant. I just love unbiased reporting. The "new Democratic" majority is a grand total of ONE - so quite trying to make it sound like it was a big gain. And I do believe that some of these democrats will begin to see the handwriting on the wall - like some in DC have - that their re-elections may well depend on their support or not support for this administration.
Ryan Sanders
|
June 11, 2012
The fact is Walker won. The people spoke. The Democratic majority making it tough is only hurting you. Wake up.
The Real Problem
|
June 07, 2012
The real problem lies not with the public sector employees unions themselves, but with the politicians (unlike Walker) who refuse to say no to the special interests and their campaign contributions. Term limits would cure most of this by eliminating the need to perpetually raise money from all the special interests (whether Wall Street, Chambers of Commerce, or the various unions).
Wrong!!
|
June 07, 2012
Walker's recall survival had more to do with the fact that most voters felt the recall should only have been used if he had done something illegal....check the exit polls!!
According the Exit
|
June 08, 2012
Polls, Walker probably lost.
Thomas J Palmer
|
June 07, 2012
The activity in Wisconsin was not a popularity contest confined to Wisconsin. Nationally there were thousands of contributions sent in supporting limiting government and providing millions of dollars telling union activist members that "Joe Citizen" will meet the challenge to temper your demands. Wisconsin governor obviously has a plan that is working to reduce deficits in the state from over $3 billion to approx. $143 million over past 18 months. The US Congress should take notice.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides