Official: Union remains financially strong
by Tom Krisher, AP Auto Writer
February 23, 2014 12:00 AM | 1163 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
An employee works on a Passat sedan at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tenn. in July 2012. As of Saturday, the United Auto Workers’ main source of income is down sharply and its ranks are a fraction of what they were just six years ago. Dennis Williams, now secretary-treasurer for the union, concedes it has been selling off stocks and other assets to balance the budget for the past seven years. But he says it also has cut spending, and more cuts are coming. <br>The Associated Press
An employee works on a Passat sedan at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tenn. in July 2012. As of Saturday, the United Auto Workers’ main source of income is down sharply and its ranks are a fraction of what they were just six years ago. Dennis Williams, now secretary-treasurer for the union, concedes it has been selling off stocks and other assets to balance the budget for the past seven years. But he says it also has cut spending, and more cuts are coming.
The Associated Press
slideshow
DETROIT — The man who appears poised to take over leadership of the United Auto Workers later this year says car companies’ fears about the union’s demise are unfounded.

Membership has dropped from a peak of 1.5 million in 1979 to 382,000 at the end of 2012, although it’s been rising slightly since 2009. Annual dues, the union’s main income source, are down 40 percent since 2006.

Dennis Williams, now secretary-treasurer for the union, concedes it has been selling off stocks and other assets to balance the budget for the past seven years. But he says it also has cut spending, and more cuts are coming.

Delegates to the union’s four-year convention in June will be asked to increase dues to help with the problem, and Williams says rising membership has started to reverse the trend of declining dues.

Williams, who led the union’s successful effort to organize an Illinois Mitsubishi plant in the late 1980s, says he’s confident the UAW will someday organize another foreign-owned auto plant in the South, even though it narrowly lost an election earlier this month at a Volkswagen factory in Chattanooga, Tenn.

Like other UAW officials, he blamed the loss on statements by Tennessee Republican politicians who said VW would add an SUV to the plant if it remained nonunion. Some threatened to cut off state incentives for a plant expansion if the union was approved.

Williams, who joined the union in 1977 as a welder, recently spoke with The Associated Press at his office in Detroit. Here are excerpts, edited for clarity and style:

Q: We’ve been told that Detroit automakers are scared, in light of the Tennessee vote, that the UAW’s finances are weak and it might have to merge into another union that doesn’t understand the business. Is that a valid concern?

A: It isn’t a valid concern. The UAW is very strong when you look at it both membership-wise and financially. It’s because of our history that we have strength.

Q: You still have more than $1 billion in assets, but you’ve been selling them off to pay operating expenses. Can you keep that up?

A: Over the past four years, we’ve taken that number down considerably and will continue to do so. We plan on balancing our budget within this term (the next four years) I’m not concerned about that. I was concerned four years ago because we didn’t really have a long-term plan. Today, we do. We’re at 400,000 members. We have a strong strike fund. So we’re stable. Anytime there’s a huge recession, you’re going to go through a period of adjustment to get your finances back in order. That’s what happened to us. We’re back on pace.

Q: Can you bring the deficit spending down even without organizing another auto plant in the South?

A: We’ve been increasing our membership in two ways. Growth in agricultural, auto and other industries. We’ve been growing by organizing, mainly in the gaming industry and the truck industry. There’s growth. And we’ve bargained growth (with Detroit automakers). We reopened a General Motors plant in Spring Hill, Tenn. We did about $20 billion in negotiations of products coming back that they had taken out of the United States.

Q: But according to Labor Department reports, revenue from dues has dropped from 2006 to 2012.

A: It actually went up last year. When I look at the trend both on (membership) growth and dues, I see that trend will continue upward.

Q: New hires with the Detroit automakers, and new recruits in casinos, are paid less than older workers at auto plants. How do you make up for the loss of higher-wage workers? Do you have to raise the wage for new hires who are paid “second-tier” wages?

A: Naturally it has to go up. When we did the second tier, we were coming out of a recession, and we tried to bring the industry up to sell vehicles at a rapid pace, and give the companies an opportunity to recover. Our goal is to bridge that gap and start from there, and the companies know that.

Q: Won’t that increase their costs?

A: It does. We know that our goal is the same. We want to make sure the companies stay competitive. We think a transparent, fair profit-sharing is part of it. We think also that we have to make sure the companies have enough money to do their research and development, to make sure they stay focused on quality.

Q: Have you had discussions about merging with other unions?

A: I have not had any discussions. Certainly President Bob King hasn’t told me he had any discussions. There has not been.

Q: How have you cut spending?

A: We’ve cut about $16 million in the past four years. We’ve taken our time now to look at the way we operate. We’re using technology a lot more than we used to. We consolidated a region. We plan on consolidating another region this year. We plan on eliminating a vice president this year. As our membership shifts we will sell off the offices or buildings and move to the locations where our membership is, and where the potential growth is.

Q: At the Volkswagen plant, some of the workers said they voted against you because your representative gave a presentation and didn’t take questions. They felt like they were being kept in the dark. Is that true?

A: Our agreement with Volkswagen was we would come in and make a presentation. Then we would have staff and UAW members there to answer questions. They thought one-on-one would be better for the associates. The only reason that happened was because of the format. The company certainly wanted us to answer all the questions for associates, so we were available.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides