Obama administration could force Congress’ hand over gun control
by Don McKee
Columnist
January 11, 2013 12:33 AM | 1222 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
The gun control debate is getting hotter than a firing range.

The Obama administration is threatening to act by executive fiat if Congress does not enact new gun control. The point man on new regulations, Vice President Joe Biden, has spelled out the president’s willingness to take action on his own if he deems it necessary.

“The president is going to act. Executive orders, executive action can be taken,” Biden told reporters, per CNN. “We haven’t decided what this is yet, but we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the Cabinet members.” Biden also said, as Reuters reported: “We are not going to get caught up in the notion that unless we can do everything, we’re going to do nothing. There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet.”

It is being speculated that Obama could issue orders to expand background checks on gun buyers, ban certain gun imports and tighten oversight of gun dealers. He could also sign executive orders that would increase information-sharing by law enforcement agencies concerning illegal gun purchases and the preservation of gun sale data for longer periods. The major targets are military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips.

A preview of plans by Obama and Democratic leaders can be seen in the legislative package by Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York: a ban on assault-type weapons with military features, limiting magazines to not more than seven bullets and authorizing confiscation of guns in possession of anyone considered mentally unstable.

The Cuomo legislation most significantly would halt the private resale of assault rifles and large capacity magazines produced before they were banned in 1994. The New York law would require registration of such pre-1994 weapons and prohibit retention of large magazines by the owners. Other restrictions would prohibit the direct sale of ammunition over the Internet in New York. The gun-control push by Cuomo could improve his position for a possible run for president in 2016, pundits observe.

At least thus far Cuomo has moved through legislative channels with his gun-control initiative — the proper way to legislate, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the legislation. It’s a stark contrast to the imperial approach of Obama who last June — without even consulting Congress where there was strong Republican opposition — issued an executive order allowing more than 800,000 illegal immigrants who came to America as children to stay here.

On that point, Georgia Republican Congressman Tom Graves of Ranger got it right with his reaction to Obama’s threat to do by executive order what Congress won’t do. Graves said if the president’s policies can’t pass Congress, “it means the American people have rejected them,” adding that a presidential order “for new gun controls would be in clear defiance of the will of the people and our democratic process.”

Will the Congress — and can the people — do anything to stop government by presidential fiat?

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kevin Foley
|
January 11, 2013
Don, why is it always "fiat" when it's a Democrat and "leadership" when it's a Republican?

IF Obama issues any executive orders concerning gun safety, they will be lawful and within his executive power.

BTW, Bush had 391 executive orders. To date, Obama has 144.
Devlin Adams
|
January 12, 2013
If Obama issues an Executive Order that violates the Constituion of the United States, such as has been suggested he might do in the case of gun control, it would not be legal, lawful or otherwise enforceable.

Think with your head, Foley. You know better than to think that any Executive Order will automatically be legal. You are not that dense.
Kevin Foley
|
January 13, 2013
@Adams - An unlawful executive order would be telling fedsto bind and gag you and not let you near a keyboard.

Do you ever engage the brain or do I just bring out your best?
echnruc upon
|
January 11, 2013
I totally agree that everyone except for convicted felons, etc. should be able to buy a pistol, hunting rifle, etc. I totally agree that nobody except for law enforcement and the military should be able to buy assault-type weapons.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides