Last to go: Bulldozers bringing down Fort Hill Homes
by Jon Gillooly
March 21, 2013 01:04 AM | 4388 views | 10 10 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Barbara Brown of Marietta waves goodbye to her old apartment at Fort Hill during its demolition on Tuesday afternoon. Brown lived in the Fort Hill Homes from 1963 until she moved to Walton Village on Aug. 28, 2012. She still calls the Fort Hill apartment where she and her sister raised five children her real home.<br>Staff/Laura Moon
Barbara Brown of Marietta waves goodbye to her old apartment at Fort Hill during its demolition on Tuesday afternoon. Brown lived in the Fort Hill Homes from 1963 until she moved to Walton Village on Aug. 28, 2012. She still calls the Fort Hill apartment where she and her sister raised five children her real home.
Staff/Laura Moon
slideshow
Bulldozers began tearing down the last of Marietta’s federal housing projects this week.

Located down the road from City Hall, the 120-unit Fort Hill housing project on Cole Street is the fifth and final public housing complex in the city left to be razed.

“Lot of good folks lived in that,” Mayor Steve Tumlin said. “Lot of memories in it, but it is the final nail in the end of an era.”

One resident was Taye Pugh, who lived there for more than a decade.

“When (Marietta Housing Authority executive director Ray Buday) called me, he told me they knocked down two of the buildings already, and I wanted to cry,” Pugh said.

Pugh, who is the Marietta Housing Authority board’s resident member, is earning a college degree through an online program and aims to become a middle school math and reading teacher.

Pugh, her husband, Carmichael, and their two daughters moved out of the two-bedroom Fort Hill unit last August and into a three-bedroom home in Walton Village on Roberta Drive, near Powder Springs Street.

Pugh said she was initially apprehensive about the move, because change is difficult for her.

But her new home has much more space, with a second bathroom, a dining room, a third bedroom and a laundry room.

To dry her clothes at Fort Hill, she hung them on a line.

“It worked, but sometimes it was frustrating because the clothes, you pull them back in, and they smelled, especially if animals were outside, so you had to start back over,” she said.

Her Fort Hill unit didn’t have a dining room, so the family ate on the sofa around a coffee table, she said.

“When we had our dining room table delivered and sitting at it for the first time and having a family dinner, it brought tears to my eyes,” she said. “It meant so much to us. That’s huge for us. We’ve never had that.”

Built in 1941 on a 10-acre tract, the Fort Hill complex lacked central air-conditioning, while its apartments had bedrooms as small as 8 by 10 feet.

In 2010, Marietta Housing Authority commissioned a study that showed that it would cost nearly $16 million to bring the property up to contemporary standards.

Residents began the process of moving out last June, with the last one leaving in October with rental vouchers that enabled them to move anywhere they chose, Buday said.

The demolition work, which is expected to take six to eight weeks at a cost of $250,000, will leave the site graded and seeded as green space while the Housing Authority’s board decides what to do with the property.

One of five

The authority demolished its first housing project, the 100-unit, 8-acre Johnny Walker Homes on Powder Springs Street, in 2004. Myrick Co. of Alpharetta proposed a $50 million mixed-use development on the site, but lost it in the recession.

The second project to be razed in 2006 was the 132-unit, 12-acre Clay Homes off Roswell Street near the Square. The MHA sold the property to Winter Properties for $8.5 million. Winter lost the property through a bank foreclosure in the recession, and it was bought by Walton Properties, which is in negotiations with the city over what to build there.

The third housing project razed in 2007 was the 10.5-acre, 125-unit Lyman Homes off Cherokee Street north of the Loop.

The property, now called Montgomery Park, is under contract with Traton Homes for $1.13 million. Buday said Traton plans to build 45 homes on the spot ranging in the $275,000 and higher price range.

“One thing we’re kind of waiting to see how things go with Montgomery Park, the Traton subdivision, and how things go with the old Meeting Park (Winter) property,” Buday said. “We don’t have any really hot prospects at this time, but, for example, if the Traton project just really sells out in no time at all, then maybe we can think about some small lot single-family homes.”

Future development

Mayor Steve Tumlin said the Traton development could decide the future in two ways.

“It could beget other residential, or it could say now that we’ve got a place for people to live, let’s build grocery stores and office buildings for people to have a place to work,” Tumlin said.

The mayor said some of his lawyer friends have said the Fort Hill site would make an excellent spot for a federal court building, while Councilman Anthony Coleman said he’d like to see affordable homes built there.

“It’s funny how people see it in different ways,” Tumlin said. “Would it be a natural extension of the downtown business community and have nice places there? The answer is yes.”

The Fort Hill site is adjacent to old Lemon Street School building, a building used as the city’s all-black school before integration.

The 5-acre Lemon Street School property is owned by the city school system, which uses the building for storage.

Tumlin said it would be ideal to combine that 5-acre tract with the 10-acre Fort Hill tract for a larger development.

“I think the first thing this community owes to that historical site would be to make sure we have a proper way to memorialize Lemon Street High School,” Tumlin said. “Fort Hill was an outstanding African-American community.”

An A-plus grade

The fourth housing project the authority razed in 2010 was the 125-unit, 13.5-acre Boston Homes on Howard Street, down the road from the Marietta School District’s central office. The authority has left that site as green space.

“We’re still waiting to see what we can do with that,” Buday said.

Taken altogether, the Housing Authority has removed blighted buildings from the city, and opened those spots up for future quality development, Tumlin said.

“The A-plus I give to the Housing Authority is they yield to the demands of (the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development), not only closed these things down, moved these people to good places, but they have left it in tip-top shape,” Tumlin said. “They’ve taken the obstacles out that might make a developer go to Canton or to Woodstock. They turned blighted buildings into nice green space.”

Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
MattieL
|
March 22, 2013
Calling people 'you sorts' is judgmental. What sort am I, in your opinion?
Sophia777
|
March 21, 2013
I can always depends on you sorts to comment on stories like the one above. Not only does familiarity breed contempt, but so too does predictability. To be clear, I find you judgmental sorts contemptible enough to make my stomach churn. You know nothing, not one thing about this sort of life. And for that you should be grateful enough to keep your poisonous words to yourself.

Perhaps you should find something better to do with your internet time; like maybe dialing up Christ and asking for a heart....

Lest you find the shoe on the other foot wondering how you're going to make a new start.
anonymous
|
March 22, 2013
I am totally, absolutely, completely, and whole-heartedly 100% for helping people find a new start. If they haven't found one after 50 years (except for the one the government provides), they aren't looking but have decided dependency is the easy way out.
anonymous
|
March 23, 2013
Read this article in mind people that work and haven't had anything handed to them. I know a lot about this "sort" of life. I gave my life to Christ many years ago. So now that we have gotten the judgmental part out of the way, listen. Welfare as Brown knew it is the end of an era, a huge mistake was made to let someone live on the dole for 50 plus years. Why would you continue to support and defend single moms populating in pubic housing without dads around? Society doesn't accept this anymore and that is a good thing, not a bad thing. My shoe has walked in conditions most people can't imagine in their worst nightmare. The point people are objecting to is this lady lives in public housing off the government dole for 50 years (maybe beyond) and we go out and work everyday, sometimes for minimum wage. She could too. Can one not make a better life for themselves and pay back what taxpayers gave them in less than 50 years? I feel for this lady. We should never, ever let this happen to another lady or to kids that they feel they are dependent on the government and they are worthless to free society. Get an education. Work. Earn what you have. That is why people resent people such as the lady in the picture so much. Between two sisters, there were seven people living off my money when I made my choice I couldn't afford more than 2 children. I divorced and my ex-husband paid child support. Who supported the 5 children mentioned in this article? Me. The taxpayer. But I didn't get an opportunity to talk to these women about birth control, I just had to pay for however many rabbits they produced is how I see it. While I was at work, they were sitting at home complaining about small bedrooms and how they deserved better. I deserve better with my tax dollar. Please look at it from this side and work to ensure this is truly the end of an era. I have walked in housing projects. I highly resent people in this article and I hope someday they will resent people in this article also. Stepping stones, yes. Dependency, no.
anonymous
|
March 21, 2013
I'm sorry, but if somebody lived in public housing from 1963 through 2012, something is very, very wrong with this picture. The picture says there were two sisters raising five children in public housing, so I read into that there was no father around. Seems like after two they would have discussed how this kept happening (or the federal assistance program would have discussed it with them) and how to prevent it. I am an extremely generous and giving person, but I believe handouts should only be given in emergency situations and are not a solution-only a bridge to help on the pathway to better things one must provide for themselves. The bedrooms in federally-subsidized residences SHOULD have bedrooms that are 6 feet x 6 feet and not as LARGE as 8 feet x 10 feet. And they SHOULDN'T have air conditioning for the federal government to maintain. They should only be built as temporary housing-not as places to hang out for decades. As mama used to say, "What makes you think I owe you a living?"
MAY-RETTA SURVIVOR
|
March 21, 2013
Wondering if Ms. Hill took time off from an actual job to participate in the photo op?

Ms. Hill, it's difficult to move forward if one is always looking backward.
Southern Patriot
|
March 21, 2013
Living in public housing for fifty years, or to put it another way, living for fifty years at the tax payers expense. Apparently these people have no desire to better themselves, why should they? They get free housing, free food and free health care. Perhaps I should renounce my personal pride and integrity and get on the Public Dole.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides