Judge OKs advancing recall effort for Crooks
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
March 10, 2010 01:00 AM | 1278 views | 9 9 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - A judge ruled Tuesday that the efforts to recall Cobb County School Board member Dr. John Crooks can move forward.

Judge Walter Matthews of Rome found that the facts as set forth by east Cobb parent Carrie Nicholas-Welkis are sufficient to constitute a recall.

Matthews' order reads, "The Court finds that the facts set forth in Ground 1 'Intent to Mislead the Public' are sufficient as a matter of law to constitute a justifiable ground for recall."

Nicholas-Welkis' recall petition argues that Crooks intended to mislead the public in calling a vote to put a cell tower at Eastvalley Elementary School without proper public notice.

Crooks said Tuesday he is disappointed with the ruling, but thought the "judge was correct in dismissing three of the four allegations because they were not supported by the facts."

"On the remaining ground, we are concerned that the judge found that a school board member can legally be subject to recall for making a motion to add an item to the board's agenda," he said in a prepared statement. "In this case, that motion was made in an open, public meeting at which the press, the media, and counsel for the board was present, and none raised any objection. If making such a motion can serve as the basis for a recall petition, then elected officials throughout Georgia should be worried. We are reviewing the decision closely and will decide soon whether to appeal."

Nicholas-Welkis said she is pleased with the judge's findings, and that she and the other constituents calling for the recall vote are ready to take action and get the necessary signatures to put it on the ballot.

"At this point it's up to the voters to decide," Nicholas-Welkis said. "It takes a village and we've got a lot of people - there's a lot of people like me out there. We're very driven and we're committed. I think today was absolutely a victory."

From here, the Cobb County Board of Elections has 15 days to certify the initial recall petition that Nicholas-Welkis filed with 119 signatures of registered voters in Crooks' Post 6. Once she receives the new recall petitions from the board of elections, Nicholas-Welkis will have 45 days to gather between 30 percent of the registered voters in the post, a number she estimates to be between 13,000 and 14,000 signatures, or roughly 300 signatures per day.

Despite the recall effort, Crooks said last month that he will not seek re-election when his term expires at the end of the year. Nicholas-Welkis speculated that, if she gets all the necessary signatures, the recall could show up on the ballot in the July primaries.

Crooks was elected to school board post 6 in November of 2006 when he beat out Democrat Beth Farokhi by about 3,500 votes in an election with a turnout of fewer than 25,000 people.

In a hearing last week regarding the recall efforts, Crooks denied purposely misleading the public by not giving proper notice that the cell tower item was placed on the July 23 school board meeting agenda. Crooks did, however, admit to saying that notifying the public of the item "would have probably caused a circus," a quote that was printed in the Marietta Daily Journal on Aug. 14.

Last July, Crooks called for a vote to allow a 150-foot cell tower at Eastvalley Elementary School, a proposal many parents and residents opposed as an unwanted eyesore. Crooks placed the cell tower matter on the board's agenda the day of the July meeting without advance advertising. Several families therefore filed suit against the school district, arguing that the board violated state Open Meetings Act by failing to give proper advance notice on the vote.

Cobb Superior Court issued a temporary restraining order against the board, halting any work from being done on the tower, but then Crooks called for second vote on the tower in October. This time it was advertised on the agenda in advance, and the board approved the tower in a vote of 4-2-1.
comments (9)
« Alan Faircloth wrote on Thursday, Mar 11 at 08:07 AM »
TO ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS - BE AFRAID....BE VERY AFRAID. The Voters are stirring with wrath and will soon be expressing their displeasure at the ballot box. The spring cleaning is about to extend well beyond our homes. BTW, ATF, the code section you seek is 50-14-1(e)(1). So the final tally is 3 judges rule against School Board (Cell Tower, Crooks Recall, Turf), Grand Jury admonishes the School District TWICE, Legislators admonish the School District TWICE, etc., etc. HAS THE DISTRICT ACTUALLY WON OR PREVAILED ON ANYTHING?
« BestIdeaYet wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 09:42 PM »
Recalling David Banks is the best idea yet. I can get a couple hundred signatures in a few days. What grounds can we recall him on? Is being a complete idiot sufficient basis for being recalled?
« WheelerParent wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 08:43 PM »
I couldn't be happier about the decision. It restores my faith in the judicial process in this country.

I grew up going to Roswell Street and currently live in Reverend Crooks district. The church and the foundation it was built on certainly don't reflect the actions taken by this individual. Today's ruling by a second judge go to show that one individual isn't bigger than the very people who put him there.

His comments following the ruling should be alarming to anyone that voted for him, myself included, and give hope to all of the honest men and women who choose to represent this district in the future.

« ATF wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 04:16 PM »
Does anyone know if there is a legal requirement that there be advance notice to put such an item on the School Board agenda?

If there is, then the School Board attorney who was present at the meeting should have alerted all to the fact that advance notice is required. Haven't we heard before that the School Board has not been appropriately advised regarding actions taken in executive session that should have been taken in an open session?

If there is no legal requirement for advance notice regarding placing items on the agenda, then Crooks made a judgement call that back-fired on him and maybe he is not political enough for the job.

« Obvious wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 02:03 PM »
It is painfully obvious, that the good Reverend Crooks does not even understand what he did wrong let alone apologizing for his abuse of his constituents. Now two judges have affirmed that there is evidence that something wrong was done by Crooks. His explanations and whining are simply a crock !
« East Cobb Mom wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 12:36 PM »
Dr. Crooks is right- every elected official in Georgia should be worried. The public is mad as hornets and isn't taking it anymore. The sooner our officials figure that out, the better off we'll all be. If, however, they listen to what the people want and vote along those lines, they have nothing to fear.

Also agree with Alan Faircloth- those post 5 parents should recall him.
« Alan Faircloth wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 09:43 AM »
PLEASE, somebody in Banks' post please recall him next.
« Wheeler Pop wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 09:29 AM »
I agree with the judges decision! Where do I sign. Reverend Crooks is a big disappointment.

« Concern parent wrote on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 05:35 AM »
HOORAY!!! Lets get a recall for the entire Board they do not listen to the concerns of anyone. They have their heads in the sand and do what they want. Get rid of all of them, even Sanderson and Brock.