Let me reiterate that although the current health care system may be imperfect and needs some work, it would be far better to leave it alone rather than to insert more government regulation, oversight and control into the current health care system. "Reform" does not necessarily have to cost the taxpayers one cent, but, according to preliminary estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the original House health care bill, HR 3962, would have resulted in over $1 trillion in government subsidies with a net cost to the taxpayers of almost $900 billion over 10 years.
The bill currently being advanced by the House leadership by way of parliamentary sleight of hand was not even available for review until Thursday. Who knows what the true financial impact will be of the reconciled bill? If the long term cost of the health care bill is anything like the long term effects of the cost of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, all of which cost far more than originally estimated, the effect on this nation's economy will be disastrous.
Yet, U.S. Rep. David Scott (D-South Cobb) and his colleagues are rushing this bill toward a final vote and appear hell bent on getting something, anything, passed regardless of the financial consequences to our nation, the adverse effect the bill will have on the absolute best health care system in the world, and, in a display of the utmost arrogance and elitism, notwithstanding the expressed opposition of most Georgians and most Americans.
The House leadership also appears to be taking an approach of allowing members to "deem the Senate bill as having been passed" so they can continue the process of destroying the current health care system. The "deemed passed" strategy is the pinnacle of political cowardice, and, in my opinion, is an admission that the Senate version of the bill is chock full of bad ideas that none of the House Democrats want to go on record as having supported.
The Democrats have had a majority in both houses and in control of the White House since January 2009. If the bill were so good, it would have been passed long before now.
Who is Rep. Scott listening to? Can he hear only the siren call of the White House and the Speaker, who, with almost one voice, have stated something to the effect that "Once the American people find out what is in the bill, we will be satisfied with it." How offensive.
How many communications like mine has Scott received imploring him to vote "no" on this bill? Is he going to cast his vote consistent with the principles of the Blue Dog Coalition that he claims to follow? Is he going to continue to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to the expressed will of the American people, who are literally shouting at their representatives in Washington to defeat this bill?
According to the latest tracking poll data (March 13/14) from Rasmussen, 53 percent of voters surveyed are opposed to the health care plan, with 46 percent being strongly opposed to the plan. Rasmussen conducted a state specific poll for Georgia in August, 2009 and found that 54 percent of those surveyed opposed the plan. The majority of Americans and the majority of Georgians do not want this bill. Even though Scott and his colleagues were sent to Washington to represent me and my neighbors, and to speak and vote on our behalf, he does not seem to care anymore about the will of the people.
I suggest that he and his colleagues should be held strictly accountable for their indifference.
Jerry Landers is a Marietta attorney.












Follow us on Twitter!
And the IRS is going to monitor 300 million taxpayers every month? Are you kidding? They can't find 40 million illegals and heaven forbid we can't possibly deport 40 million people, but we have the resources and motivation to monitor the monthly spending for insurance for 300 million taxpayers?
David Scott is a traitor, and how did he get elected anyway?
I think you misread my posting. I don't support SS or Medicare. Most conservatives don't. But, Republicans in Washington support these socialist programs as they scare people about the health care proposal.
Somehow, people think that our "Representatives" represent us. They represent themselves. They get the money from lobbyists and the perks of being in Washington. We get to pay for it.
You are right on target. Just who is Rep. Scott supposed to represent? I thought it was his home district. However, now he
appears to represent Pres. Obama and Washington. Not listening
to the voters back home.
I have sent several "vote NO " request. Does he ever look at these?
You are right in that this bill will cost the American tax payers a lot of money, more than $1 Trillion estimate for sure. I've been puzzled by Republicans criticizing this bill for taking money from another Socialist program called Medicare. Why are conservatives defending socialist programs like Medicare and Social Security and then shouting down the insurance bill? Sounds like pure politics to me. This bill hasn't been handled properly by either sides (both sides have lied). I'm sure you didn't spread the lie about the "Death Panel," as I'm sure no one believes this bill could lower the deficit. So, as long as Republicans and Democrats continue to run Washington, we'll get the same politics that we've had for decades.