Gun Control: The fog continues to roll
by Bob Barr
Columnist
July 29, 2012 10:00 PM | 2030 views | 12 12 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Taking a cue from no less an expert than Hillary Clinton, President Barack Obama — and other anti-Second Amendment advocates — are riding the coattails of the recent mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado, shamelessly to press their gun-control agenda.

During a European visit in 2009, Secretary of State Clinton admonished a group of young people to use the economic crisis then-still gaining steam to press their political agendas. Clinton proudly noted Obama was doing just that to move his so-called “green agenda” to combat climate change. In an unusual display of candor, Clinton lectured her audience to “never waste a good crisis” to push a pet political project.

Taking Clinton’s advice, anti-gun politicians are seizing on the tragedy that took place in Aurora — where a lone gunman murdered a dozen people in cold blood and wounded 53 others — to try and foist new gun control measures on Americans.

Within hours of the July 20 shooting rampage at the Aurora movie theater, cries to reinstate the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban” (signed into law by Clinton’s husband in 1994), began making the rounds. During a press conference Tuesday, anti-firearms Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) proclaimed, “This is the perfect opportunity to get something done (on gun control).”

Another irrepressible anti-gun crusader — New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — demanded that both Obama and Republican nominee-in-waiting Mitt Romney place gun control on the front burner of their campaigns. In what truly is one of the most idiotic and irresponsible pronouncements ever by a public official, Bloomberg then proposed that police officers go on strike until more gun laws are enacted. Hizzoner later tried to “explain” his remarks to mean something other than what he very clearly stated to CNN’s Piers Morgan. But the thrust of Bloomberg’s words was clear — citizens who do not demand stricter gun control measures do not deserve police protection.

Obama tried initially to stay out of the post-Aurora gun-control spotlight; but his true instincts got the better of him. At a New Orleans campaign event Wednesday, the president proclaimed that the mass murder highlighted the need to enact tougher firearms background checks.

Mimicking one of the canards favored by the anti-Second Amendment crowd, the president decreed that “an AK-47 belongs in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals,” as if criminals routinely employed such rifles, which they do not; and as if U.S. military uses the AK-47, which it does not.

The most frequent cry in the nation’s capital is that Congress should react to the shooting by reviving the “assault weapons” ban, which expired in 2004. That discredited law banned hundreds of firearms based on little more than the views of its prime sponsor — California’s uber-liberal Sen. Dianne Feinstein — that such firearms looked mean.

With families in Colorado grieving over the loss of loved ones, the thought of playing politics with this tragedy is truly sickening. But such concerns have not in the wake of past similar shootings caused anti-gun officials to pause; and this most recent act of a crazed “creep” (as writer Bob Tyrrell aptly labeled the Aurora shooter in a recent townhall.com column) is no exception.

Thankfully, law-abiding Americans see through this gun control fog, and increasingly are not swayed by such emotion-laced rhetoric.

Even after the shooting last year in Tucson, Arizona which severely wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, support for stricter gun control continued to show a decline from previous years. As Chris Cillizza noted last week in the Washington Post, a Pew Research study found that less than half those surveyed — 45 percent — believed controlling gun ownership was more important than the right to own a firearm.

The perpetrator who carried out the cowardly attack in Aurora appears clearly to be worthy of swift justice and capital punishment.

The law-abiding citizen who wishes to avail himself of the right to self-defense guaranteed by the Second Amendment, is not the one who should be punished.

The American people understand this; President Obama, Mayor Bloomberg, and their liberal friends, do not — and never will.

The deficiency in understanding both human nature and American history reflected in views such as theirs, is reason sufficient to remove them from office.

Former U.S. Attorney and Congressman Bob Barr (R-Ga.) is on the board of the National Rifle Association
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FROM TEXAS
|
July 30, 2012
Why doesn’t Michael Doomberg work on the Fast & Furious issue first and find all the illegal guns that the U.S. used to give to m Mexican drug dealers; that were used to kill Mexicans citizens and U.S. government employees. If another South Central L.A. happens and you don’t have weapons and ammo don’t count on the local police to have enough resources to protect you. You and your neighbors will have to secure your own neighborhood. Bill O’ Riley is dead wrong as well he wouldn’t be here if all the Southerners hadn’t came up from the south to lend guns ammo and their marksman ship to take out the Red Coats. Make sure you out law all gas containers and cell phones because that is the choice overseas because it’s easier than guns and does far more damage. This Aurora incident is the typical gamer from your Nanny State schools and why didn’t the psychiatrist flag his records so he couldn’t buy weapons; a background check would have flagged? So if anybody is to blame it’s the psychiatrist and the families need to sue her first there’s always some other red flag but law bidding gun owners get blamed for the system not working. You know the Nazi’s marched across Europe unopposed and pulled citizens’ out of their house and raped and killed them at will, how you think that would go down in the south
Devlin Adams
|
July 30, 2012
To Yeah-right. Since you have obviously been in a coma for the past week, please read Bill Press's column today. That will update you on most of the actions being taken by the gun control freaks
Yeah right....
|
July 30, 2012
Mr Barr (and his many supporters in this community)....thou do protest too much.

In fact, your allegations here are (1) predictable (2) tiresome (3) same old same old from the right wing playbook....as your "counter-protests" have preceded any actual calls from legislators or advocates of gun control and your strategy is to use these premature allegations as a prophylactic against legitimate re-consideration of the vast liberalization of gun access & carry rights that the NRA has foist upon the innocent citizens of this country over the past 20 years.

So, the upshot...it is in fact YOU (and the other gun proliferation advocates) who have chosen to prematurely "politicize" the Aurora tragedy...and further, a tragedy such as Aurora is as good a time as any to re-look at ALL the possible root causes of the gun-based violence in this country and what could be done to help mitigate the risks of such events from happening again.

Kevin Foley
|
July 30, 2012
Hey Bob, how's that campaign you were running with the murderous thug Baby Doc Duvalier going? I laughed out loud when you were quoted saying that punk had "a message of hope" for the survivors of the earhquake in Haiti. I'm sure you collected a nice chunk of his blood money for saying garbage like that.

President Obama has never, not once, offered any gun control legislation.

SG68
|
July 30, 2012
@ Kevin Fooley

And Obama has never, not once offered any kind of meaningful, constructive leadership for this country.
Devlin Adams
|
July 30, 2012
Foley, you just run off about the first thng that pops into your head, no nmatter how inane. Never mind addressing the issue.

Hang in there, though, We need to comic relief.
Kevin Foley
|
July 31, 2012
@SG68: Really? Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive.
Rob Alexander
|
August 02, 2012
Um, the UN Small Arms treaty was his attempt at gun control. Obama tried to bypass the legislature entirely.
SG68
|
August 04, 2012
Navy Seals killed Osama Bin Laden not Obama. If he had to pull the trigger he would have piddled in his pants and cried for his mommy!!

Besides

What was Obama going to do order them not to put that dog down, like Bill Clinton did when he was in office.

He had no choice. For him it was purely a political decision, not a strategic one.

It was a no brainer decision for a no brainer president. Even you Mr. Fooley could have made that call.

And as for GM have you read the latest reports on how they are doing now that the Government has taken them under their wing?

Their profits dropped 41% last quarter!!

And if those are the two best examples you can cite as examples of Obama's leadership then you are grasping at straws.

Obama is an arrogant, socialist coward!!
Wristtwister
|
July 29, 2012
As usual, the anti-gunners want to take the guns away from everybody that didn't have anything to do with the sensational crime, and further disarm the unarmed citizens that were struck down. How can you argue with such rational logic?
Rob Alexander
|
August 02, 2012
Exactly, the first thing the statists do is try to take guns away from the people who didn't do anything wrong... CLEARLY an attempt to utilize an emotional event to obtain more power and control.

Amazing that there are still so many CATTLE in this country who fall for the act.
Jose222
|
July 29, 2012
"1935 will go down in History! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead to the future!" --Adolph Hitler

If you want to address the real problem, legalize marijuana and outlaw Celexa, Cipramil, Cipram, Dalsan, Recital, Emocal, Sepram, Seropram, Citox, Cital, Lexapro, Cipralex, Seroplex, Esertia, Depex, Prozac, Fontex, Seromex, Seronil, Sarafem, Ladose, Motivest, Flutop, Luvox, Fevarin, Faverin, Dumyrox, Favoxil, Movox, Paxil, Seroxat, Sereupin, Aropax, Deroxat, Divarius, Rexetin, Xetanor, Paroxat, Loxamine, Deparo, Zoloft, Lustral, Serlain, and Asentra.

Blaming guns for a chemical inbalance in the brain caused by anti-depressants does nothing except serve a political agenda. A motor vehicle can be much more dangerous than an assault-style rifle so you need to be realistic, that is if you are serious.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides