Gay marriage equality box spreads on social media
March 27, 2013 04:12 PM | 2708 views | 8 8 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

NEW YORK (AP) — Bud Light said it with beer cans and Martha Stewart with red velvet cake as companies and celebrities from Beyonce to George Takei joined millions of social media users in posting and tweaking a simple red logo in support of gay marriage.

A square box with thick pink horizontal lines (the mathematical equal symbol) was offered for sharing this week by the Human Rights Campaign as the U.S. Supreme Court took up arguments in key marriage rights cases.

The image, replacing profile pictures on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, Pinterest and elsewhere, is a makeover of the advocacy group's logo, usually a blue background with bright yellow lines. The HRC made it available in red — for the color of love — on Monday and estimated tens of millions of shares by Wednesday.

"It shows the enthusiasm and the passion," said Fred Sainz, a spokesman for the nonprofit in Washington, D.C.

Like viral campaigns of yore, supporting breast cancer awareness (pink), President Barack Obama (change your middle name to Hussein) and even Arab Spring (green), a bit of fatigue set in on some social media streams by those questioning whether such efforts serve to change any minds or, put simply, are plain annoying.

"My Facebook feed is a cascading aesthetic nightmare. Thanks, equality," Washington Post writer Dan Zak wryly grumbled on Twitter.

A photo of Justice Anthony Kennedy made the rounds with the quip: "Before we make a ruling, did enough people change their Facebook profile picture?!"

None of that mattered to the masses of same-sex marriage supporters. Some swapped matzoh for the pink lines as Passover got under way, or added frowny Internet star Grumpy Cat, who explained marriage equality would make her happy.

Bert and Ernie showed up against the red background. (They're best friends with no plans to marry, according to Sesame Street.) Another version featured Paula Deen atop the red square and lines turned a shade of yellow akin to her favorite fatty ingredient and the tagline: "It's like two sticks of butter y'all."

Takei, a noted punster with nearly 4 million followers in Facebook, turned the equal sign into the division sign for those opposed to marriage equality.

Beyonce, with more than 44 million followers there, played it straight, leaving the logo alone and adding a personal message: "It's about TIME!!! (hash)EQUALITY (hash)MarryWhoYouLove.

Fergie let the image speak for itself on Twitter, adding: "No words necessary." Montana Sen. John Tester, a Democrat who endorsed same-sex marriage on Tuesday, put the logo up as his profile on Facebook while the clothing site Bonobos swapped its usual Facebook pic for the red square using fancy white pants for the equal sign.

Martha Stewart's Facebook page used a slice of red cake with white icing to make the image and the HBO page for "True Blood" added fangs.

All in good fun?

"There's a lot of serious conversation going on and there's an awful lot of important concepts that the Supreme Court justices are discussing," Sainz said. "What this logo going viral means is individuals have reduced it to a very straightforward concept."

Steve Jones, a professor of online culture and communications at the University of Illinois at Chicago, wondered whether all the mash-ups muddle the message.

"Once you throw it together with something like Grumpy Cat it's fun," he said. "But was this message intended to be fun?"


Associated Press writer Barbara Ortutay contributed to this report.


Follow Leanne Italie on Twitter at

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Lib in Cobb
March 28, 2013
EQUALITY, if not today, then very soon. If all the gay and lesbian couples were to marry, nothing would change, except the gay and lesbians would then have equality. In 1967, inter-racial couples were permitted to legally marry. NOTHING CHANGED. If you don't wish to marry a person of the same sex, then don't.

Really, everything will be fine, you conservatives who believe life will never be the same, you can untwist your panties now.
Pink Boxes
March 28, 2013
See? My dog is still not a cat and my panties aren't twisted.
Wrong Lib
March 31, 2013
Wrong. If all marriages turned to same sex, everything would change. Humans would no longer be. You can't have children.
Josh Yu
April 03, 2013
Wrong Lib, you're an idiot. The poster specifically said "if all the gay and lesbian couples were to marry"... not if all heterosexual marriages would magically turn into homosexual ones. Do you think you're coming up with new information when you say two men or two women can't have children together? Stop trying to use that argument for everything, life's about love, not trying to reproduce every chance you get. Do me a favor: stop being ignorant. :)
Pink Boxes
March 27, 2013
I think it's fine that many of my friends support gay marriage, but I would much prefer civil unions. I don't want to stop gay people from living out loving lives together, but like Justice Roberts, I just don't understand why a life union between same sex couples has to be labeled a "marriage." Aren't we just talking about semantics? I mean, my dog is not my cat. They're both great, but they are different. I cannot say this on social media. Those pink bricks would be hurled hard at my head until my cyber skull was crushed to bits. It's impossible to even have a conversation about this issue without being called some very ugly things. So when the option is to get stoned (or bricked) by a very vocal (and bullying) minority for starting a conversation, silence can feel golden.
Human Equality
March 29, 2013
I'm sure you think the "colored people" having their own fountains was fine too right? I mean, they are still water fountains.

If it's "just semantics" to you, what is the problem?
Pink Boxes
March 30, 2013
Again... Case made. This person is accusing me of the worst kind of bigotry for thinking that a marriage has a fixed definition.
Go Pink Boxes
March 31, 2013
Your point was very clearly demonstrated by the reply to it.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides