Former President Carter says unchecked political contributions are ‘legal bribery’
July 17, 2013 11:53 PM | 797 views | 0 0 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, left, talks with Democracy Program Director David Carroll at the Carter Center on Wednesday in Atlanta. Carter gave the keynote remarks on U.S. election reform, along with Ambassador Janez Lenarcic of the Warsaw-based Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. <br> The Associated Press
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, left, talks with Democracy Program Director David Carroll at the Carter Center on Wednesday in Atlanta. Carter gave the keynote remarks on U.S. election reform, along with Ambassador Janez Lenarcic of the Warsaw-based Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.
The Associated Press
slideshow
By Ray Henry

Associated Press Writer

ATLANTA — Former President Jimmy Carter said Wednesday that unchecked political contributions are “legal bribery of candidates” and denounced a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that made possible unlimited spending by outside groups, including corporations and labor unions.

“It’s accepted fact,” Carter said during a speech in Atlanta. “It’s legal bribery of candidates. And that repayment may be in the form of an ambassadorship to someone who has raised three or four hundred thousand dollars to help a candidate get elected.”

Carter spoke at a forum where an agency of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe released its report on last year’s U.S. election. The U.S. government invited the European agency to observe the process.

He said the U.S. Supreme Court made a “very stupid” decision by removing limits on independent campaign spending by businesses and labor unions, which the court found was a constitutionally protected form of political speech. The Democrat said that he and his Republican opponents used public financing to run their general election campaigns in 1976 and 1980.

Carter more generally criticized the amount of private contributions flowing into political campaigns.

“I would say that it’s almost impossible for a candidate, like I was back in those early days or others even, to be considered seriously as a candidate to represent the Democratic or Republican parties as nominee if you can’t raise $100 million or $200 million from contributors, many of whom know that they are making an investment in how they are going to be treated by the winner after the election is over,” Carter said.

Carter said that while elections in the United States once set an example for the world, the country’s reputation diminished in 2000 when the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in a Florida vote recount, effectively deciding the election in favor of Republican George W. Bush. He also criticized GOP-led state legislatures for changing polling hours in ways that Carter said were meant to frustrate likely Democratic voters.

The OSCE report found that:

* The 2012 election was administered professionally and the public generally viewed the outcome as legitimate;

* Voter identification rules vary across the states and have become politicized;

* Political spending by outside groups can be exempt from disclosure requirements, raising transparency concerns; and

* Rules on vote recounts vary widely and are not always clearly defined, which could result in complaints.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides