Family awarded $35M in Six Flags beating case
by Nikki Wiley
November 22, 2013 11:55 PM | 11407 views | 3 3 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA — Six Flags over Georgia and four of its former employees have been ordered to pay $35 million to the family of a man who suffered a traumatic brain injury from a beating he received by a Six Flags employee in 2007.

Attorneys for the family of Joshua Martin, who was 19 at the time, say the Cobb County civil court jury found Six Flags was 92 percent at fault for the attack and four park employees were each 2 percent at fault.

That leaves Six Flags responsible for $32 million and the employees responsible for $3 million.

The employees have pleaded or been found guilty of violating Georgia’s Gang Act and aggravated assault.

“The jury understood the evidence that Six Flags tolerated its employees being in gangs and ignored the culture of violence on its property,” said attorney Andy Rogers in a statement issued Thursday. “Had Six Flags addressed these issues and provided reasonable security, Josh’s beating would not have happened.”

Martin traveled to the park July 3, 2007, to celebrate a friend’s acceptance into college. When leaving the park, Martin and his friends missed the bus at a stop just past Six Flags’ property line.

Just before Martin left the park, employees wearing colors associated with local gang YGL, which stands for young gangster living, threatened a family inside the park. The incident was reported to park security, but Six Flags did not have off-duty police officers present that night, according to the news release from Martin’s family attorneys.

After the gang wasn’t able to attack the family in the park, they randomly selected Martin and his friends, who were waiting at the bus stop, the attorneys said.

Martin was beaten with brass knuckles to the point of entering a coma. He remained in the coma for one week and has severe brain damage. Two of his friends escaped with lesser injuries.

“The brain injury in this case was clearly severe. Josh was in a coma for seven days. His life care plan showed a need for at least $7 million to assist Josh to live in the structured environment he needs,” said attorney Susan Cremer. “Six Flags chose not to present any experts or other witnesses to refute the diagnosis of brain damage, Josh’s life care plan, or his lost earning capacity.”

Six Flags maintains its innocence, said Emily Murray, spokeswoman for the park.

“What happened to Mr. Martin in 2007 was tragic, but the incident in question did not take place on our property. The jury verdict is not justified by the facts and we are determining our next steps,” Murray said. “The safety of our guests and employees is our highest priority.”

Attorneys say gang activity was prevalent at Six Flags. Employees hung photos in a locker room with tags associated with national gangs, like the Crips and Bloods, and local hangs like YGL, which stands for young gangster living, according the victim’s attorneys.

Six Flags defended its actions claiming that the bus stop where the beating occurred is just beyond the park’s property line.

A police officer testified during the seven-day trial that the bus stop was a hot bed for crime.

“Georgia law requires that a company like Six Flags keep its premises and approaches safe. In this case, Six Flags had taken control over Six Flags Parkway, a county road that was the only way for people to enter or exit Six Flags,” said attorney Gilbert Deitch. “It placed signs and exercised control over property Six Flags purported not to own. Under the unique facts of this case – with the prior drive-by shooting, the gang activity, and other violence at or near the bus stop – the jury correctly found that Six Flags had a duty to keep the only approach to its property safe.”

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Moving outa ATL ASAP
March 12, 2015
I agree with May-retta. It was Six Flag's responsibility to maintain a safe environment for its patrons. Dave's excuse-making and blame-the-victim mentality would be feasible...IF Six Flags still allowed people with Concealed Permits to carry inside the park. But white patrons, seen as easy targets by roving gangs of "teens", are rendered helpless. Also, I haven't seen more than 2 white employees at SFOG in the past 2 years, and I only go there because I HAVE to, for my child's cheerleading competition each year. Generally speaking, not a whole lot of whites join gangs...and two of my college friends worked there in the late '80s. Violent employees wasn't a problem then.

I don't go anywhere in Atlanta without a Glock under my shirt, so I have to lock my gun in my car's gun safe when I'm at Six Flags. Also, if folks like me aren't mindful of our gas tank levels, we won't have enough fuel to get back to the relative safety of the northern suburbs, or pay the jacked-up prices at the two little pumps in Six Flag's parking lot. Then there's the insane traffic on the return drive home...only traveling north, mind you. There's a reason why so much traffic all seems to be going UP I-75 and 85.

In order to "take back our park", we'd have to take back our city, even our whole country, from hordes of violent "youths". (Read Colin Flaherty's books for more info.) Some of us are doing just that: leaving the Southeast and Atlantic Seaboard for the Pacific Northwest, building new safe communities there, hunkering down, and storing up our ammo. One day, the criminally violent will get what they've been foolishly begging for...and the DOJ won't be able to help them.
November 23, 2013
Our family stopped going to Six Flags years ago.

Sadly, it is not uncommon to see and experience gangs of unruly thugs - usually black or hispanic - roaming the park, cutting in front of lines, and looking for trouble...without any interference whatsoever from Six Flag "security".

Dirty and filthy restrooms, over-priced "food" and surly, unfriendly staff await anyone stupid enough to pay for the privledge.

The sooner all of Georgia boycots Six Flags the better off and safer we'll all be!
November 26, 2013
It sounds to me that you would rather put this on a business than the folks that committed the crime. I am sure Six Flags employs a lot of folks from your community and if they were boycotted or closed it would do even more damage to the community. I cannot speak to what they do to prevent violence, but perhaps instead of blame they need assistance. It should not be on businesses to prevent crime that is a communities job with the leadership of local authorities. You simply want to accept the thugs and blame a business. What if that park was not six flags but rather a private park with a single owner would you say the same? Bad things happen when good people fail to act. Ask yourself are you failing to act? There are things you can do to help and not put yourself in harms way. Take back your community, take back your park.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides