Emergency room visit shows U.S. health care flaws
by Dan K. Thomasson
Columnist
June 26, 2012 12:00 AM | 742 views | 8 8 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Have you been to the emergency room lately? If you haven’t, try to avoid it. That may not be possible, because when you call your primary-care doctor seeking immediate attention, the first thing you hear is an automated voice telling you to “call 911 or go directly to the ER.”

Trying to find relief in the emergency room — especially on or approaching a holiday — is like stumbling into a scene jointly written by Joseph Heller and Franz Kafka. As in “Catch 22” and “The Castle,” there’s no way out.

The horror began in mid-afternoon with a hurried call for help. The 74-year-old woman had fallen and feared she was badly hurt. Her daughter arrived within minutes and found her on the floor, unable to get on her feet. They called 911. The response was quick, and with some effort she was placed on a gurney and rushed to the hospital two miles away.

After the daughter had dealt with the admittance bureaucracy in what has become Northern Virginia’s major hospital center, she found her mother in an ER treatment room in major discomfort. Nurses and doctors filed in and out, with long intervals in between. X-rays showed that she has broken her right arm near the shoulder (she’s right-handed). The final diagnosis was that, while she did not need surgery, she would need a sling for more than a month. Her right knee, while not broken, could not support her.

An orthopedic resident showed up six hours later and declined to admit the woman, despite her age, her lack of mobility, her diabetes and a history of congestive heart failure. The patient lives alone in a house full of stairs, and her daughter’s house was no better suited to dealing with her injuries.

“We can’t admit her for a broken arm,” he said.

“But it is more than that,” the daughter protested.

The patient was released. After a heroic struggle, she was somehow loaded into the back of the daughter’s car, driven home and ultimately installed in a recliner on the house’s first floor, not far from a powder room. There she stayed for four days as relatives took turns attending. Throughout the process, numerous calls for nursing care or admittance to a rehab center ended with “you need to call these people.” It became clear no outside help was available on a holiday weekend. More importantly, the patient was told, in a classic Heller turn: “You have to be admitted to the hospital for three nights before Medicare or anyone else will come to the rescue.”

Guess what? That would mean going back through the ER process, a totally unacceptable solution. By the fifth day, the woman was running a fever, had developed a severe cough, and was listless and refusing food. The daughter again called the ambulance and the mother went to the ER. Seven hours later, the patient was moved again — this time to a room in the hospital’s heart center. She had developed pneumonia from being unable to move, and there were signs of other severe problems. A week later, she was assigned to rehab.

All this could have been avoided with the proper response to the first emergency.

The ER staff is a hassled, overworked lot that moves at a snail’s pace and the ER specialists seem oblivious to ailments except with the most urgent trauma. (In 13 hours, the patient had spent less than five minutes in the presence of an actual doctor.) Much of this clearly stems from the fact that Americans with no insurance use the ERs as their only access to medicine. They have no doctor, just the ER, and they naturally clog the system. They have no other recourse.

Medical care in America is a learning experience. One of the things learned is that it frequently doesn’t work very well.

Dan K. Thomasson is former editor of the Scripps Howard News Service.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Can understand
|
June 26, 2012
I had a similar experience here with our local hospital. Spent 12 hours in the emergency room, in pain, finally someone put a cast on the arm, said it was a clean break, (which it very much was not) and sent me home. It was the most terrifying experience of my life. The doctor was young, not sympathetic, seemingly indifferent and even now, looking back, I feel she was not suited for her job. I have told my family that I do not ever, under any circumstances, intend to go back there. I had rather die in my own home.
oh my
|
June 26, 2012
While in the ER I hope her diabetes, CHF and social needs were addressed,as well as her fracture. Locally, a fractured arm would not warrant admission to the hospital if her overall medical condition is stable. Her family should have requested a referral to a home health agency so a RN, PT and OT would be sent to her home the next day. All of their services are covered under Medicare. The goal of home health is to keep people out of the hospital. Families also need to step up to the plate to assist elderly family members and not depend on the government to care for them.
Retired Nurse
|
June 26, 2012
You complain about the hospital "system" where it took 6 hours for an orthopedic surgeon to come. Well, first they need x-rays and a radiologist to read them to make sure an ortho is needed, and on a holiday weekend. I have waited over an hour to see my ortho and I had an appointment. Many doctors reviewed her labs, history, nurses' notes, medications and wrote orders for pain meds and ortho consult aside from the time they spent in front of the patient.

Medicare is paying for her hospital stay and it is not the government's problem if you allowed a 74 year old relative to live alone in a home with stairs. Someone should have thought of that way before it is an emergency. Her previous lack of mobility with CHF and Diabetes according to your post. Sorry is no one else in the entire family has accommodations suitable either, but you could have taken her to a handicap accessible hotel room.

The pneumonia was a result of inactivity, also patient driven, not a result of the ER visit. No one can walk or deep breathe or cough for an injured person, they must do that for themselves.

You are lucky you did not have to wait forever to be brought into a room. Most ER's around here are covered over with illegal aliens with minor problems who think it is their right to treatment but give false information so they don't have to pay. My husband had chest pain after a heart attack and open heart surgery and had to wait to see an admittance clerk. We alone spoke English and the place was run over with unsupervised children running around.
br548
|
June 26, 2012
Obamacare won't fix this problem, it will only make it worse.
case manager
|
June 26, 2012
the fact that this woman was not admitted had nothing to do with the doctors, nurses,, or hospital. they work within medicare regulations. there is nothing anybody can do about it. if you don't like it, then call your senators and representatives and get the medicare regulations changed. they WILL NOT allow a person to be admitted for a fractured arm period. don't blame it all on the doctors and hospital. you're taking the easy way out and you know better than to insinuate something like that, shame on you.
Devlin Adams
|
June 26, 2012
Case manager. People like you are part of the problem, not the solution. Just like most of you, you did not listen. (In this case, did not read). The broken arm was not the reason this woman should have been admitted. She had myriad other problems relating to the fall, which, at her age, is dangerous enough as it is, All this was told to the people who refused to admit her and was obvious to those who had examined her.

Get off your self righteous soapbox.
Healthcare Worker
|
June 26, 2012
Amen Case Manager! Stay on that soapbox. The system dictates the treatment way too much. Insurance companies and the Government (Medicare, Medicaid, Obama-care) treat the practice of medicine as a cookie-cutter check sheet philosophy. The practice of medicine is an art form that requires a medically educated and trained person looking at all the issues surrounding a patient's condition and treating, not an LPN (sometimes a high school graduate) working for the insurance company with a flowchart/checklist that tells the Doctor if the patient meets criteria to be admitted to the Hospital.
CASE MANAGER
|
June 26, 2012
No Devin, you're not listening. All of this has to do with Medicare regulations. If you think for one minute that a hospital is going to turn down an admission that will be reimbursed you're nuts. You don't have any idea what the problem is, so in fact YOU are part of the problem in blaming other parts of the system for this. I've been working with Medicare guidelines for 12 years and there is nothing in this story that points to a necessary admission according to Medicare guidelines. You need to call your senators and legislatures to get the Medicare policies changed and quit barking up the wrong tree and become part of the solution. We battle with these regulations every single day. EVERY DAY!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides